Morphological, functional and aesthetic criteria of acceptable mature occlusion

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 373-381

  Svedström Oristo, Anna Liisa ^a   Pietilä, Terttu ^b   Pietilä, Ilpo ^b   Alanen, Pentti ^a   Varrela, Juha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b Pori Health Centre   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CLINIC; DENTITION; FINLAND; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MASTICATORY MUSCLE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHODONTICS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIVATE PRACTICE; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; TOOTH; TOOTH OCCLUSION; UNIVERSITY;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DENTAL CLINICS; DENTAL OCCLUSION; DENTITION; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FINLAND; GENERAL PRACTICE, DENTAL; HUMANS; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MASTICATORY MUSCLES; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHODONTICS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIVATE PRACTICE; QUESTIONNAIRES; STATISTICS; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; TOOTH; UNIVERSITIES; URBAN HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 0035434890     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/23.4.373     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Angle E H 1899 Classification of malocclusion. Dental Cosmos 41: 248-264
2. Brook P H, Shaw W C 1989 The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. European Journal of Orthodontics 11: 309-320
3. Burden D J, Mitropoulos C M, Shaw W C 1994 Residual orthodontic treatment need in a sample of 15- and 16-year-olds. British Dental Journal 176: 220-224
4. Buttke T M, Proffit W R 1999 Referring adult patients for orthodontic treatment. Journal of the American Dental Association 130: 73-79
5. Cons N C, Jenny J, Kohout F J, Freer T J, Eismann D 1983 Perceptions of occlusal conditions in Australia, the German Democratic Republic and the United States of America. International Dental Journal 33: 200-206
6. Cytel Software Corporation 1991 StatXact user manual, version 2. Cambridge, MA, USA
7. Espeland L V, Stenvik A 1991 Perception of personal dental appearance in young adults: relationship between occlusion, awareness, and satisfaction. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 100: 234-241
8. Espeland L, Stenvik A 1999 Residual need in orthodontically untreated 16-20-year-olds from areas with different treatment rates. European Journal of Orthodontics 21: 523-531
9. Graber L W, Lucker G W 1980 Dental esthetic self-evaluation and satisfaction. American Journal of Orthodontics 77: 163-173
10. Hannuksela A 1977 The prevalence of malocclusion and the need for orthodontic treatment in 9-year old Finnish schoolchildren. Proceedings of the Finnish Dental Society 73: 21-26
11. Ingervall B 1976 Functionally optimal occlusion: the goal of orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics 70: 81-90
12. Jenny J 1975 A social perspective on need and demand for orthodontic treatment. International Dental Journal 25: 248-256
13. Kiyak H A 1981 Comparison of esthetic values among Caucasians and Pacific-Asians. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 9: 219-223
14. Langlois J H, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein A, Larson A, Hallam M, Smoot M 2000 Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin 26: 390-423
15. Lucker G W, Graber L W, Pietromonaco P 1981 The importance of dentofacial appearance in facial esthetics: a signal detection approach. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2: 261-274
16. Luther F 1998 Orthodontics and the temporomandibular joint: where are we now? Part 2. Functional occlusion, malocclusion, and TMD. Angle Orthodontist 68: 305-318
17. McLain J B, Proffit W R 1985 Oral health status in the United States: prevalence of malocclusion. Journal of Dental Education 49: 386-396
18. McNamara J A 1997 Orthodontic treatment and temporomandibular disorders. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics 83: 107-117
19. Mealey L, Bridgstock R, Townsend G C 1999 Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness: a monozygotic co-twin comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76: 151-158
20. Medical Board of Finland 1988 Hampaiston oikomishoidon järjestäminen. Lääkintö-hallituksen ohjekirje nro 6/88. Helsinki
21. Meerdink J E, Garbin C P, Leger D W 1990 Cross-gender perceptions of facial attributes and their relation to attractiveness: do we see them differently than they see us? Perception & Psychophysics 48: 227-233
22. Myllärniemi S 1970 Malocclusion in Finnish rural children. Proceedings of the Finnish Dental Society 66: 221-264
23. Norges offentlige utredninger 1986 Folketrygdens finansiering av tannhelsearbeid. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, NOU No. 25
24. Peck S, Peck L 1995 Selected aspects of the art and science of facial esthetics. Seminars in Orthodontics 1: 105-126
25. Phillips C, Griffin T, Bennet E 1995 Perception of facial attractiveness by patients, peers and professionals. International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery 10: 127-135
26. Pietilä T, Pietilä I 1996 Dental appearance and orthodontic services assessed by 15-16-year-old adolescents in Eastern Finland. Community Dental Health 13: 139-144
27. Pietilä T, Pietilä I, Widström E, Varrela J, Alanen P 1997 Extent and provision of orthodontic services for children and adolescents in Finland. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 25: 150-155
28. Prahl-Andersen B 1978 The need for orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthodontist 48: 1-9
29. Prahl-Andersen et al. 1997 International comparisons of orthodontic professional assessments of treatment need and outcome. In: ter Heege G (ed.) Euro-Qual. Towards a quality system for European orthodontic professionals. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 89-115
30. Pullinger A G, Seligman D A 2000 Quantification and validation of predictive values of occlusal variables in temporomandibular disorders using a multifactorial analysis. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 83: 66-75
31. Richmond S, Roberts C T, Andrews M 1994a Use of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) in assessing the need for orthodontic treatment pre- and post-appliance therapy. British Journal of Orthodontics 21: 175-184
32. Richmond S, O'Brien K D, Roberts C T, Andrews M 1994b Dentists variation in the determination of orthodontic treatment need. British Journal of Orthodontics 21: 65-68
33. Roth R H 1981 Functional occlusion for the orthodontist. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 15: 32-51
34. Sadowsky C, Polson A M 1984 Temporomandibular disorders and functional occlusion after orthodontic treatment: results of two long-term studies. American Journal of Orthodontics 86: 386-390
35. Shaw W C 1981 The influence of children’s dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. American Journal of Orthodontics 79: 399-415
36. Shaw W C, Lewis H G, Robertson N R E 1975 Perception of malocclusion. British Dental Journal 138: 211-216
37. Shaw W C, Meek S C, Jones D S 1980 Nicknames, teasing, harassment and the salience of dental features among school children. British Journal of Orthodontics 7: 75-80
38. Shaw W C, O'Brien K D, Richmond S 1991 Quality control in orthodontics: factors influencing the receipt of orthodontic treatment. British Dental Journal 170: 66-68
39. Shaw W C, Rees G, Dawe M, Charles C R 1985 The influence of dentofacial appearance on social attractiveness of young adults. American Journal of Orthodontics 87: 21-26
40. Solow B 1995 Guest Editorial: orthodontic screening and third party financing. European Journal of Orthodontics 17: 79-83
41. Svedström-Oristo A-L, Pietilä T, Pietilä I, Alanen P, Varrela J 2000 Outlining the morphological characteristics of acceptable occlusion. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 28: 35-41
42. Tedesco L A, Albino J E, Cunat J J, Slakter M J, Waltz K J 1983 A dental-facial attractiveness scale. Part II. Consistency of perception. American Journal of Orthodontics 83: 44-46
43. Terry R L 1977 Further evidence on components of facial attractiveness. Perceptual and Motor Skills 45: 130
44. Terry R L, Davis J S 1976 Components of facial attractiveness. Perceptual and Motor Skills 42: 918
45. Tulloch C, Phillips C, Dann C 1993 Cephalometric measures as indicators of facial attractiveness. International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery 8: 171-179
46. Vig K W L, Weyant R, O'Brien K, Bennett E 1999 Developing outcome measures in orthodontics that reflect patient and provider values. Seminars in Orthodontics 5: 85-95