Outlining the morphological characteristics of acceptable occlusion

Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 35-41

  Svedström Oristo, Anna Liisa ^a   Pietilä, Terttu ^b   Pietilä, Ilpo ^b   Alanen, Pentti ^a   Varrela, Juha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b Varkaus Health Centre   (Finland)

Author keywords

Acceptable occlusion; Orthodontic treatment need indices

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FINLAND; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; JAW; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHODONTICS; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS; TOOTH; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DENTAL OCCLUSION; FEMALE; FINLAND; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; JAW; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; QUESTIONNAIRES; TOOTH;

EID: 0034133736     PISSN: 03015661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2000.280105.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Pietilä T, Pietilä I, Widström E, Varrela J, Alanen P. Hampaiden oikomishoito terveyskeskuksissa [Orthodontic treatment provided by Finnish health centres, in Finnish]. STAKES: Raportteja no. 154. Helsinki; 1994.
2. Pietilä T, Pietilä I, Widström E, Varrela J, Alanen P. Extent and provision of orthodontic services for children and adolescents in Finland. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25:150-5.
3. Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972;62:296-309.
4. Massler M, Frankel JM. Prevalence of malocclusion in children aged 14 to 18 years. Am J Orthod 1951;7:751-68.
5. Gardiner JH. A survey of malocclusion and some aetiological factors in 1000 Sheffield schoolchildren. Dent Pract 1956;6:187-98.
6. Platou C, Zachrisson BU. Incisor position in Scandinavian children with ideal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1983; 83:341-52.
7. Berg R. Post-retention analysis of treatment problems and failures in 264 consecutively treated cases. Eur J Orthod 1979;1:55-68.
8. Berg R, Fredlund A. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment results. Eur J Orthod 1981;3:181-5.
9. Pickering EA, Vig P. The Occlusal Index used to assess orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1975;2:47-51.
10. Elderton RJ, Clark JD. Orthodontic treatment in the general dental service assessed by the Occlusal Index. Br J Orthod 1983;10:178-86.
11. Summers CJ. The occlusal index: a system for identifying and scoring occlusal disorders. Am J Orthod 1971;59:552-67.
12. Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:180-7.
13. Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:309-20.
14. Norges offentlige utredninger. No. 25. Folketrygdens finansiering av tannhelsearbeid. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, NOU; 1986.
15. Burden DJ, Mitropoulos CM, Shaw WC. Residual orthodontic treatment need in a sample of 15- and 16-year-olds. Br Dent J 1994;176:220-4.
16. O'Brien KD, Shaw WC, Roberts CT. The use of occlusal indices in assessing the provision of orthodontic treatment by the hospital orthodontic service of England and Wales. Br J Orthod 1993;20:25-35.
17. Cytel Software Corporation. StatXact user manual, version 2. Cambridge (MA) USA; 1991.
18. Casko JS, Shepherd WB. Dental and skeletal variation within the range of normal. Angle Orthod 1984;54:5-17.
19. Hopkins JB, Murphy J. Variations in good occlusions. Angle Orthod 1971;41:55-65.
20. Green J, O'Brien K. The influence of the setting of "cutoff" points for orthodontic treatment need upon the reliability of the index of orthodontic treatment need. Br J Orthod 1994;21:287-9.
21. Egermark-Eriksson I, Carlsson GE, Magnusson T, Thilander B. A longitudinal study on malocclusion in relation to signs and symptoms of cranio-mandibular disorders in children and adolescents. Eur J Orthod 1990;12:399-407.
22. Lieberman MA, Gazit E, Fuchs C, Lilos P. Mandibular dysfunction in 10-18 year old school children as related to morphological malocclusion. J Oral Rehabil 1985;12:209-14.
23. Riolo ML, Brandt D, TenHave TR. Associations between occlusal characteristics and signs and symptoms of TMJ dysfunction in children and young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1987;92:467-77.
24. Mohlin B, Thilander B. The importance of the relationship between malocclusion and mandibular dysfunction and some clinical applications in adults. Eur J Orthod 1984;6:192-204.
25. Clark JR, Evans RD. Functional occlusal relationships in a group of post-orthodontic patients: preliminary findings. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:103-10.
26. Egermark-Eriksson I, Ingervall B, Carlsson GE. The dependence of mandibular dysfunction in children on functional and morphologic malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1983;83:187-94.
27. Helm S, Petersen PE. Mandibular dysfunction in adulthood in relation to morphologic malocclusion at adolescence. Acta Odontol Scand 1989;47:307-14.
28. Pilley JR, Mohlin B, Shaw WC, Kingdon A. A survey of craniomandibular disorders in 500 19-year-olds. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:57-70.
29. Bergström K, Hailing A. Orthodontic treatment outcome in three Swedish counties with different orthodontic resources. Swed Dent J 1996;20:51-60.
30. Richmond S, O'Brien KD, Roberts CT, Andrews M. Dentists' variation in the determination of orthodontic treatment need. Br J Orthod 1994;21:65-8.
31. Shaw WC, O'Brien KD, Richmond S. Quality control in orthodontics: factors influencing the receipt of orthodontic treatment. Br Dent J 1991;170:66-8.
32. Lääkintöhallituksen ohjekirje nro 6/88. Hampaiston oikomishoidon järjestäminen. Helsinki: 1988.