Stimulus-Response Compatibility Is Information-Action Compatibility

Ecological Psychology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 25-45

  Stins, John F ^a,b   Michaels, Claire F ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0348017084     PISSN: 10407413     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326969eco0901_2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alluisi, E. A., & Warm, J. S. (1990). Things that go together: A review of stimulus-response compatibility and related effects. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 3-30). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
2. Bootsma, R. J. (1988). The timing of rapid interceptive actions. Amsterdam: Free University Press.
3. Bootsma, R. J. (1989). Accuracy of perceptual systems subserving different perception-action systems. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(A), 489-500.
4. Chon, S., & Michaels, C. F. (1991). Affordances and S-R compatibilities: The affect of a nominally irrelevant aversive stimulus. In P. Beck, R. J. Bootsma, & P. C. W. van Wieringen (Eds.), Studies in perception and action (pp. 216-219). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
5. Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (Original work published 1979)
6. Guiard, Y. (1983). The lateral coding of rotations: A study of the Simon effect with wheel-rotation responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 331-342.
7. Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention; determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270-279.
8. Hommel, B., & Lippa, Y. (1995). S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 370-374.
9. Komblum, S. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 855-875.
10. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T, & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
11. Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437-459.
12. Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
13. Michaels, C. F. (1988). S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: Evidence of the detection of affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 231-240.
14. Michaels, C. F. (1993). Destination compatibility, affordances, and coding rules: A reply to Proctor, Van Zandt, Lu, and Weeks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1121-1127.
15. Michaels, C. F., & Carello, C. (1981). Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Michaels, C. F., & Stins, J. F. (1997). An ecological approach to S-R compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 330-360). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
17. Proctor, R. W., Van Zandt, T., Lu, C.-H., & Weeks, D. J. (1993). Stimulus-response compatibility for moving stimuli: Perception of affordances or directional coding? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 81-91.
18. Reed, E S. (1982). An outline of a theory of action systems. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 98-134.
19. Reeve, T. G., & Proctor, R. W. (1990). The salient-features coding principle for spatial- and symbolic-compatibility effects. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 163-180). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
20. Riggio, L., Gawryszewski, L de G., & Umiltà, C. (1986). What is crossed in crossed-hands effects? Acta Psychologiea, 62, 89-100.
21. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
22. Stins, J. F., & Michaels, C. F. (1997). Stimulus-target comparability for reaching movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 756-767.
23. Tipper, S. P., Lortie, C., & Baylis, G. C. (1992). Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centered attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 891-905.
24. Turvey, M. T. (1990). Coordination. American Psychologist, 45, 938-953.
25. Turvey, M. T., Carello, C, & Kim, N.-G. (1990). Links between active perception and the control of action. In H. Haken & M. Stadler (Eds.), Synergetics of cognition, (pp. 259-295). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
26. Umiltà, C., & Nicolctti, R. (1992). An integrated model of the Simon effect. In J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Junca de Morais, & M. Radeau (Eds.), Analytic approaches to human cognition (pp. 331-350). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
27. Wallace, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354-360.
28. Warren, W. H. (1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 683-703.
29. Warren, W. H. (1988). Action modes and laws of control for the visual guidance of action. In O. G. Meijer & K. Roth (Eds.), Complex movement behaviour: The motor-action controversy (pp. 339-379). Amsterdam: North-Holland.