Paradoxes in networks with zero emission links: Implications for telecommunications versus transportation

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 283-296

  Nagurney, Anna ^a   Dong, June ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT OSWEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Emission paradoxes; Emission pricing policies; Network equilibrium; Telecommunications versus transportation

Indexed keywords

COSTS; DECISION MAKING; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS;

ZERO EMISSIONS;

TRANSPORTATION;

EMISSION CONTROL; METHODOLOGY; PRICING POLICY; TELECOMMUNICATIONS; TRAVEL DEMAND;

EID: 0035400422     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1361-9209(00)00032-8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Model improvements for evaluating pricing strategies
2. Simulating automobile emissions in an integrated urban model
3. Uber ein paradoxon der verkehrsplanung
4. A paradox of congestion on a queing network
5. The traffic assignment problem for multimodal networks
6. Traffic equilibrium and variational inequalities
7. On some traffic equilibrium theory paradoxes
8. The traffic assignment problem for a general network
9. Trip-based approach to estimate emissions with environmental protection agency's MOBILE model
10. More paradoxes in the equilibrium assignment problem
11. Obtaining network cost(s) from one link's output
12. Avoiding the Braess paradox in non-cooperative networks
13. The extragradient method for finding saddle points and other problems
14. Braess's paradox of traffic flow
15. Congested urban transportation networks and emission paradoxes
16. A multiclass, multicriteria traffic network equilibrium model
17. Braess' paradox: Some new insights
18. Existence, uniqueness and stability of traffic equilibria
19. The prevalence of Braess' paradox
20. Multiobjective decision making for traffic assignment