Disability? Long on the agenda for some bioethicists

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 45-46

  Mahowald, Mary B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; DISABLED PERSON; ETHICIST; FEMINISM; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HUMAN; NEWBORN; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

ADULT; BIOETHICS; DISABLED PERSONS; ETHICISTS; FEMINISM; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; PATIENT ADVOCACY;

EID: 0035382710     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651601750418035     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Kittay, E. 1998. Love's labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependence. New York: Routledge.
2. Kuczewski, M. G. 2001. Disability: An agenda for bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics 1(3):36-44
3. Lyerly, A. D., and M. B. Mahowald. 2001. Maternal-fetal surgery: The fallacy of abstraction and the problem of equipoise. Healthcare Analysis.
4. Mahowald, M. B. 1993. Women and children in healthcare: An unequal majority. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Mahowald, M. B. 2000. Genes, women, equality. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Overall, C. 1998. Passing for normal. In A feminist I: Reflections from academia, ed. C. Overall, 151-171. Peterborough: Broadview Press.
7. Silvers, A., D. Wasserman, and M. B. Mahowald. 1998. Disability, difference, discrimination: Perspectives on justice in bioethics and public policy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 1985. Child abuse and neglect prevention and treatment program; Final rule. Federal Register 50(11 Jan.): 1487-1492.
9. Wendell, S. 1996. The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York: Routledge.