Classification of Environmental Estrogens by Physicochemical Properties Using Principal Component Analysis and Hierarchical Cluster Analysis

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 718-726

  Suzuki, Takahiro ^a,b   Ide, Kunihito ^a   Ishida, Masaru ^a   Shapiro, S ^b  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALKALINITY; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; HOLOGRAMS; HYDROGEN BONDS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VAN DER WAALS FORCES;

POLARIZABILITY;

HORMONES;

ESTROGEN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; POLLUTANT; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; ESTROGENS, NON-STEROIDAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

EID: 0035324936     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci000333f     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Colborn, T. Environmental estrogens: health implications for humans and wildlife. Environ. Health Perspect. 1995. 103(Suppl. 7), 135- 136.
2. Sonnenschein, C.; Soto, A. M. An updated review of environmental estrogen and androgen mimics and antagonists. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1998, 65, 143-150.
3. Wiseman, H. Importance of oestrogen, xenoestrogen and phytoestrogen metabolism in breast cancer risk. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1999, 27, 299- 304.
4. Waller, C. L.; Oprea, T. I.; Chae, K.; Park, H.-K.; Korach, K. S.; Laws, S. C.; Wiese, T. E.; Kelce, W. R.; Gray, L. E.; Jr. Ligand-based identification of environmental estrogens. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1996, 9, 1240-1248.
5. Keith, L. H. Environmental Endocrine Disruptors: A Handbook of Property Data; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1997.
6. Tong, W.; Perkins, R.; Xing, L.; Welsh, W. J.; Sheehan, D. M. QSAR models for binding of estrogenic compounds to estrogen receptor α and β subtypes. Endocrinology 1997, 138, 4022-4025.
7. Bradbury, S. P.; Mekenyan, O. G.; Ankley, G. T. Quantitative structure - activity relationships for polychlorinated hydroxybiphenyl estrogen receptor binding affinity: an assessment of conformer flexibility? Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1996, 15, 1945-1954.
8. Gantchev, T. G.; Ali, H.; van Lier, J. E. Quantitative structure - activity relationships/ comparative molecular field analysis (QSAR/CoMFA) for receptor-binding properties of halogenated estradiol derivatives. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 4164-4176.
9. Tong, W.; Lowis, D. R.; Perkins, R.; Chen, Yu; Welsh, W. J.; Goddette, D. W.; Heritage, T, W.; Sheehan, D. M. Evaluation of quantitative structure - activity relationship methods for large-scale prediction of chemicals binding to the estrogen receptor. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 669-677.
10. Gao, H.; Williams, C.; Labute, P.; Bajorath, J. Binary quantitative structure - activity relationship (QSAR) analysis of estrogen receptor ligands. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 164-168.
11. Gao, H.; Katzenellenbogen, J. A.; Garg, R.; Mansch, C. Comparative QSAR analysis of estrogen receptor ligands. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 723-744.
12. Strategic Program on Environmental Endocrine Disruptors '98, Japan Environment Agency; May 1998; available at http://www.eic.or.jp/ eanet/e/end/sp98.html.
13. Karelson, M. Molecular Descriptors in QSAR/QSPR; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 2000.
14. Livingstone, D. J. The characterization of chemical structures using molecular properties. A survey. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 195-209.
15. Kier, L. B., Hall, L. H. Molecular Connectivity in Structure - Activity Analysis; Research Studies Press: Letchworth, Herts, U.K., 1986.
16. Ajay, W.; Walters, P.; Murcko, M. A. Can we learn to distinguish between "drug-like"and "nondrug-like" molecules? J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3314-3324.
17. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. Use of structure - activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 572-584.
18. Dewar, M. J. S.; Zoebisch, E. G.; Healy, E. F.; Stewart, J. J. P. AM1: A new general purpose quantum mechanical molecular model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3902-3909.
19. Baker, J. An algorithm for the location of transition states, J. Comput. Chem. 1986, 7, 385-395.
20. Sangster, J. LOGKOW - A Databank of Evaluated Octanol - Water Partition Coefficients; Sangster Research Laboratories: Montréal, Canada, 1993.
21. Suzuki, T. Development of an automatic estimation system for both the partition coefficient and aqueous solubility. J. Comput.-Aid. Mol. Des. 1991, 5, 149-166.
22. Simamora, P.; Miller, A. H.; Yalkowsky, S. H. Melting point and normal boiling point correlations: applications to rigid aromatic compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1993, 33, 437-440.
23. Simamora, P.; Yalkowsky, S. H. Group contribution methods for predicting the melting point and boiling point of aromatic compounds. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994, 33, 1405-1409.
24. Krzyzaniak, J. F.; Myrdal, P. B.; Simamora, P.; Yalkowsky, S. H. Boiling point and melting point prediction for aliphatic, non-hydrogen bonding compounds. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1995, 34, 2530-2535.
25. Joback, K. G.; Reid, R. C. Estimation of pure-component properties from group contributions. Chem. Eng. Comm. 1987, 57, 233-243.
26. Ward, J. H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 1963, 58, 236-244.
27. Verlopp A.; Hoogenstraaten, W.; Tipker, J. Development and application of new steric substituent parameters in drug design, Drug Design 1976, 7, 165-207.
28. Shapiro, S.; Guggenheim, B. Inhibition of oral bacteria by phenolic compounds. Part 2. Correlations with molecular descriptors. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1998, 17, 338-347.
29. Cramer, R., III.; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959-5967.
30. Kearsley, S. K.; Smith, G. M. An alternative method for the alignment of molecular structures: maximizing electrostatic and steric overlap. Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol. 1990, 3, 615-633.
31. Todeschini, R.; Gramatica, P. The WHIM theory: new 3D-molecular descriptors for QSAR in environmental modelling. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 1997, 7, 85-115.
32. Todeschini, R.; Gramatica, P. New 3D molecular descriptors; the WHIM theory and QSAR applications. Perspect. Drug Discov. Des. 1998, 9-11, 355-380.
33. Famini, G. R.; Wilson, L. Y. Using theoretical descriptors in linear solvation energy relationships. Theor. Comput. Chem. 1994, 1, 213- 241.
34. 33
35. Katrizky, A. R.; Mu, L.; Lobanov, V. S.; Karelson, M. Correlation of boiling points with molecular structure. 1. A training set of 298 diverse organics and a test set of 9 simple inorganics. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 10400-10407.
36. Zupan, J.; Gasteiger, J. Neural Networks in Chemistry and Drug Design: An Introduction; 2nd ed., Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 1999.
37. Suzuki, T.; Eben, R.-U.; Schüürmann, G. Development of both linear and nonlinear methods to predict the liquid viscosity at 20° C of organic compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 1122-1128.
38. Cramer III, R. D. BC(DEF) Parameters. 1. The intrinsic dimensionality of intermolecularinteractions in the liquid state. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 1837-1849.
39. Anstead, G. M.; Carlson, K. E.; Katzenellenbogen, A. The estradiol pharmacophore: ligand structure-estrogen receptor binding affinity relationships and a model for the receptor binding site. Steroids 1997, 62, 268-303.
40. Concepts and Applications of Molecular Similarity, Johnson, M., Maggiora, G. M., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1990.
41. Oprea, T. I.; Ho, C. M. W.; Marshall, G. R. De nova design. Ligand construction and prediction of affinity, In Computer-Aided Molecular Design. Applications in Agrochemicals, Materials, and Pharmaceuticals; Reyonolds, C. H., Holloway, M. K., Cox, H. K., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series 589; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1995: pp 64-81.
42. Szejtli, J. Cyclodextrin Technology; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, NL, 1988.
43. Carpignano, R.; Marzona, M.; Cattaneo, E.; Quaranta, S. QSAR study of inclusion complexes of heterocyclic compounds with β-cyclodextrin. Anal. Chim. Acta 1997, 348, 489-493.
44. Hamasaki, K.; Ueno, A.; Toda, F.; Suzuki, I.; Osa, T. Molecular recognition indicators of modified cyclodextrins using twisted intramolecular charge-transfer fluorescence. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1994, 67, 516-523.
45. Krismundsdóttir, T.; Loftsson, T.; Holbrook, W. P. Formulation and clinical evaluation ofa hydrocortisone solution for the treatment of oral disease. Int. J. Pharm. 1996, 139, 63-68.
46. Cserháti, T.;, Forgács, E. Inclusion complex formation of steroidal drugs withhydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin studied by charge-transfer chromatography. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1998, 18, 179-185.
47. Abraham, M. H.; McGowan, J. C. The use of characteristic volumes to measure cavity terms in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. Chromatographia 1987, 23, 243-246.
48. Suzuki, T.; Ide, K.; Ishida, M. Evaluation of synergistic effects of environmental oestrogens. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1999, 51(Suppl.), 142.
49. Berenbaum, M. C. What is synergy? Pharmacol. Rev. 1989, 41, 93-141.