Resources review: Information and involvement

Health Expectations

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 71-74

  Thornton, H ^a  

^a Saionara ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MASS SCREENING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; UNITED KINGDOM;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL TRIALS; COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION;

EID: 0035293810     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00129.x     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Information needs of cancer patients in the West of Scotland: Cross-sectional survey of patients' views
2. Patient information materials in Oncology: Are they needed and do they work?
3. Breast cancer trials: A patient's viewpoint
4. Today's patient: Passive or involved?
5. Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?
6. Letters. Screening mammography re-evaluated
7. Lifelines
8. The patient's role in research
9. Are randomized trials of hormone replacement therapy in symptomatic women with breast cancer feasible?
10. Quoted in Silverman W.A.
11. Should a mammographic screening programme carry the warning. 'Screening can damage your health'?
12. Decision analysis and the implementation of research findings
13. Proposed patient-centred method of delivering information about the risks and benefits of therapy. The likelihood of being helped versus harmed