Human genome diversity: What about the other human genome project?

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 222-227

  Greely, Henry T ^a  

^a STANFORD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHICS; FORECASTING; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME PROJECT; REVIEW;

ETHICS; FORECASTING; HUMAN GENOME PROJECT; HUMANS;

EID: 0035289982     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/35056071     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Wilson, A. C., Cantor, C. R., Cook-Deegan, R. M. & King, M. C. Call for a worldwide survey of human genetic diversity: a vanishing opportunity for the human genome project. Genomics 11, 490-491 (1991).
2. Human Genome Diversity Committee of HUGO Human Genome Diversity (HGD) Project. Summary Document (HUGO Europe, London, 1995). Also available at http://www.stanford.edu/group/morrinst/HGDP.htm.
3. Cook-Deegan, R. M. Gene Wars: Science, Politics, and the Human Genome (W. W. Norton & Co., New York, 1994).
4. International Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860-921 (2001).
5. Hirschfeld, L. & Hirschfeld, L. Serological differences between the blood of different races: the results of researches on the Macedonian front. Lancet II, 675-695 (1919).
6. Schneider, W. H. The history of research on blood group genetics: initial discovery and diffusion. Hist. Philos. Life Sci. 18, 7-33 (1996).
7. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Menozzi, P. & Piazza, A. History and Geography of Human Genes. (Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey, 1994).
8. Marks, J. The Human Genome Diversity Project. Anthropol. News 72 (April 1995).
9. Lock, M. Interrogating the Human Genome Variation Project. Soc. Sci. Med. 39, 603-606 (1994).
10. (US) National Bioethics Advisory Commission The Use of Human Biological Materials in Research (National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Bethesda, Maryland, 1999).
11. North American Regional Committee of the Human Genome Diversity Project. Proposed model ethical protocol for collecting DNA samples. Houston Law Rev. 33, 1431-1473 (1997). Also available at http://www.stanford.edu/groups/morrinst/HGDP.htm.
12. Rural Advancement Foundation International Patents, indigenous peoples, and human genetic diversity. RAFI Communiqué (May 1993). Also available at the Rural Advancement Foundation International home page, http://rafi.org.
13. Declaration of Indigenous Peoples of the Western Hemisphere Regarding the Human Genome Diversity Project. Cultural Survival Quart. 20, 50 (Summer 1996). Also available at http://www.indians.org/welker/genome.htm.
14. Harry, D. The Human Genome Diversity Project. Abya Yala News 8, 8 (1994).
15. Armstrong, J. Global trade targets indigenous gene lines. Natl Catholic Rep. 27 (January 11-12, 1995).
16. Mead, A. T. P. Genealogy, sacredness and the commodities market. Cultural Survival Quart. 20, 46-49 (1996).
17. Liloqula, R. Value of life: saving genes versus saving indigenous peoples. Cultural Survival Quart. 20, 42-45 (1996).
18. HUGO Ethics Committee Genetic benefit sharing. Science 290, 49 (2000).
19. Pennisi, E. NRC OKs long delayed survey of human genome diversity. Science 278, 568 (1997).
20. MacIlwain, C. Diversity project 'does not merit federal funding'. Nature 389, 774 (1997).
21. Support for genetic diversity project. Nature 390, 221 (1997).
22. Schull, W. J. Genetic diversity survey. Science 279, 10 (1998).
23. Schull, W. J. Support for genetic diversity project. Nature 390, 221 (1997).
24. Smaglik, P. Genetic diversity project fights for its life. Nature 404, 912 (2000).
25. Marshall, E. Drug firms to create public database of genetic mutations. Science 284, 406-407 (1999).
26. Collins, F. S., Brooks, L. D. & Chakravarti, A. A DNA polymorphism discovery resource for research on human genetic variation. Genome Res. 8, 1229-1231 (1998).
27. Greely, H. T. Iceland's plan for genomics research: facts and implications. Jurimetrics 40, 153-191 (2000).
28. Frank, L. Estonia prepares for national DNA database. Science 290, 31 (1999).
29. Greenwood, J. The business of genes: Newfoundland hopes to reap the benefits after its genetic heritage has helped decode the human genome. Natl Post D1 (June 24, 2000).
30. Hagmann, M. Epidemiology. U.K. plans major medical DNA database. Science 287, 1184 (2000).
31. Kolata, G. Boston U. founds company to sift landmark heart data. New York Times A9 (June 17, 2000).
32. Barkham, P. Faraway Tonga cashes in on its gene pool secrets. Guardian (Lond.) 20 (November 23, 2000)
33. Greely, H. T. in Human DNA Sampling: Law and Policy - International and Comparative Perspectives (ed. Knoppers, B. M.) 239-256 (Kluwer Law International. The Hague, 1997).
34. National Research Council Evaluating Human Genetic Diversity. (National Academy, Washington, DC, 1997).
35. Juengst, E. T. Group identity and human diversity: keeping biology straight from culture. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63, 673-677 (1998).
36. Juengst, E. T. Groups as gatekeepers to genomic research: conceptually confusing, morally hazardous, and practically useless. Kennedy Inst. Ethics J. 8, 183-200 (1998).
37. Reilly, P. R. Rethinking risks to human subjects in genetic research. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63, 682-685 (1998).
38. Reilly, P. R. & Page, D. C. We're off to see the genome. Nature Genet. 20, 15-17 (1998).
39. Greely, H. T. The control of genetic research: involving the groups between. Houston Law Rev. 33, 1397-1430 (1997).
40. Freeman, W. L. in Stored Tissue Samples: Ethical, Legal, and Policy Implications (ed. Weir, R. F.) 267-301 (Univ. Iowa Press, Iowa City, 1998).
41. Foster, M. W. et al. The role of community review in evaluating the collective risks of human genetic variation research. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 64, 1719-1727 (1999).
42. Foster, M. W. & Sharp, R. R. Involving study populations in the review of genetic research. J. Law Med. Ethics 28, 41-51 (2000).
43. Foster, M. W., Bernsten, D. & Carter, T. H. A model agreement for genetic research in socially identifiable populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63, 696-702 (1998).
44. Weijer, C., Goldsand, G. & Emanuel, E. J. Protecting communities in research: current guidelines and limits of extrapolation. Nature Genet. 23, 275-280 (1999).
45. Roberts, L. How to sample the world's genetic diversity. Science 257, 1204-1205 (1992).
46. Roberts, L. Anthropologists climb gingerly on board. Science 258, 1300-1301 (1992).
47. Knoppers, B. M., Hirtle, M., Lormeau, S., Laberge, C. M. & Laflamme. M. Control of DNA samples and information. Genomics 50, 385-401 (1998).
48. UNESCO. International Bioethics Committee, Subcommittee on Bioethics and Population Genetics Bioethics and Human Population Genetics Research (UNESCO, Paris, November 15, 1995). Also available at http://zobell.biol.tsukuba.ac.jp/~macer/PG.html
49. Macer, D. R. J., Fleming, J., Keyeux, G. & Knoppers, B. M. UNESCO and population genetics. Nature 379, 11 (1996).