Ease of use versus clinical effectiveness of restorative materials

Quintessence International

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 239-242

  Burke, F J T ^a   Liebler, M ^b   Eliades, G ^c   Randall, R C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b 3M House ^*

^c 3M Drug Delivery Systems   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical effectiveness; Ease of use; Technique sensitivity

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COST; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIST; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; JOB SATISFACTION; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; TOOTH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTISTS; HUMANS; JOB SATISFACTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WATER;

EID: 0035279535     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs: ADA Council on Dental Benefit programs. Statement on posterior resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998:129:1627-1628.
2. Burke FJT, Cheung SW, Mjor IA, Wilson NHF. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 1999:30:234-242.
3. Burke FJT, Mjor IA, Wilson NHF. Influence of patient variables on restoration placement. [abstract 1925]. J Dent Res 2000;79:384.
4. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE. Selection of restorative materials, reasons for replacement and longevity of restorations in Florida. J Am Coll Dent 1998:45:27-33.
5. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Italy. Oper Dent 1992;17:70-73.
6. Mjör IA. The reason for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:58-63.
7. Crisp RJ, Burke FJT. One-year clinical evaluation of compomer restorations placed in general practice. Quintessence Int 2000;31:181-186.
8. De Trey Dentsply. Dyract. A single-component compomer. The technology behind it. Konstanz, Germany: De Trey Dentsply, 1994.
9. Abate PF, Bertacchini M, Polack MA, Macchi RL. Adhesion of a compomer to dental structures. Quintessence Int 1997;28:509-512.
10. Unterbrink GL, Liebenberg WH. Flowable resin composites as "filled adhesives": Literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int 1999;30:249-257.
11. Fritz UB, Finger WJ. Bonding efficiency of single-bottle enamel/dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 1999;12:277-282.
12. Vougiouklakis G, Eliades G, Palaghias G. Monomer microseparation of single-bottle adhesives in the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone. IADR/CED Meeting, Montpellier, Sept 1999.