Training the scientists and engineers of tomorrow: A person-situation approach

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 296-323

  Cross, Susan E ^a  

^a Iowa State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035242126     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb00198.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Anderson, V. (1994). How engineering education shortchanges women. Journal of Women and Minorities in the Sciences and Engineering, 1, 99-121.
2. Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S. E. (1992). Modeling cognitive adaptation: A longitudinal investigation of the impact of individual differences and coping on college adjustment and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 989-1003.
3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Berg, H. M., & Ferber, M. A. (1983). Men and women graduate students: Who succeeds and why? Journal of Higher Education, 54, 629-648.
5. Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1991). Measures of self-esteem. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 115-160). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6. Brockner, J. (1979). Self-esteem, self-consciousness, and task performance: Replications, extensions, and possible explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 461-477.
7. Brown, J. D. (1998). The self. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
8. Brown, R. P., & Josephs, R. A. (1999). A burden of proof: Stereotype relevance and gender differences in math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 246-257.
9. Cohen, S., Karmarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385-396.
10. Cohen, S., Tyrrell, D. A. J., & Smith, A. P. (1993). Negative life events, perceived stress, negative affect, and susceptibility to the common cold. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 131-140.
11. Constantinople, A., Cornelius, R., & Gray, J. (1988). The chilly climate: Fact or artifact? Journal of Higher Education, 59, 527-550.
12. Crawford, M., & MacLeod, M. (1990). Gender in the college classroom: An assessment of the "chilly climate" for women. Sex Roles, 23, 101-122.
13. Crocker, J., & Lawrence, J. S. (1999). Social stigma and self-esteem: The role of contingencies of worth. In D. Prentice & D. T. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides (pp. 364-392). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
14. Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371-386.
15. Crosby, F., Clayton, S., Alksnis, O., & Hemker, K. (1986). Cognitive biases in the perception of discrimination: The importance of format. Sex Roles, 14, 637-646.
16. Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-37.
17. Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R. (1994). Self-schemas, possible selves, and competent performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 423-438.
18. Cutrona, C. E., Cole, V., Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Russell, D. W. (1994). Perceived parental social support and academic achievement: An attachment theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 369-378.
19. Davis, C. S., & Rosser, S. V. (1996). Program and curricular interventions. In C. S. Davis, A. B. Ginorio, C. S. Hollenshead, B. B. Lazarus, & P. M. Rayman (Eds.), The equity equation (pp. 232-264). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20. Deaux, K. (1976). Sex: A perspective on the attribution process. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 335-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Didion, C. J., Fox, M. A., & Jones, M. E. (1998). Cultivating academic careers: AWIS project on academic climate. AWIS Magazine, 27, 22-27.
22. Donahue, E. M., Robins, R. W., Roberts, B. W., & John, O. P. (1993). The divided self: Concurrent and longitudinal effects of psychological adjustment and social roles on self-concept differentiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 834-836.
23. Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women's educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585-609.
24. Etkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., Neuschatz, M., & Uzzi, B. (1992). Athena unbound: Barriers to women in academic science and engineering. Science and Public Policy, 19, 157-179.
25. Farmer, H. S., Wardrop, J. L., Anderson, M. Z., & Risinger, R. (1995). Women's career choices: Focus on science, math, and technology careers. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 155-170.
26. Fassinger, R. E. (1990). Causal models of career choice in two samples of college women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36, 225-248.
27. Fitzgerald, L. F., Shullman, S. L., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, Y., Ormerod, M., & Weitzman, L. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152-175.
28. Gebbie, K. (1992). Why encourage women to enter physics? APS News, 5, 6.
29. Gibbons, A. (1996). Facing the big chill in science. Science, 271, 1902-1905.
30. Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31. Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18, 326-339.
32. Hackett, G., Betz, N. E., Casas, J. M., & Rocha-Singh, I. A. (1992). Gender, ethnicity, and social cognitive factors predicting the academic achievement of students in engineering. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 527-538.
33. Hall, R. M., & Sandler, B. R. (1982). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.
34. Healy, B. (1992). Women in science: From panes to ceilings. Science, 255, 1333.
35. Hollenshead, C. S., Wenzel, S. A., Lazarus, B. B., & Nair, I. (1996). The graduate experience in the sciences and engineering: Rethinking a gendered institution. In D. S. Davis, A. B. Ginorio, C. S. Hollenshead, B. B. Lazarus, & P. M. Raymond (Eds.), The equity equation (pp. 122-162). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
36. Kahn, R. L., & Byosiere, P. (1992). Stress in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, p. 571-650). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
37. Kihlstrom, J. F., & Klein, S. B. (1994). The self as a knowledge structure. In R. S. Wyer, Jr., & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (pp. 153-208). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Kimball, M. M. (1989). A new perspective on women's math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 198-214.
39. Kumagai, J. (1994). Survey and site visits evaluate "climate" for women in physics. Physics Today, 47, 57-58.
40. LeBold, W. K. (1987). Women in engineering and science: An undergraduate research perspective. In L. S. Dix (Ed.), Women: Their underrepresentation and career differentials in science and engineering (pp. 49-101). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
41. Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G., & Bieschke, K. J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 424-430.
42. Major, B., Feinstein, J., & Crocker, J. (1994). Attributional ambiguity of affirmative action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 51, 113-141.
43. Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemas and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.
44. McFarlin, D. B., & Blascovich, J. (1981). Effects of self-esteem and performance on future affective preferences and cognitive expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 521-531.
45. McIlwee, J. S., & Robinson, J. G. (1992). Women in engineering: Gender, power, and workplace culture. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
46. Midgley, F., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. S. (1989). Student/teacher relations and attitudes toward mathematics before and after the transition to junior high school. Child Development, 60, 981-992.
47. Mowday, R. T., & Sutton, R. I. (1993). Organizational behavior: Linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 195-229.
48. National Science Foundation. (1994). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Arlington, VA: Author.
49. Oakes, J. (1990). Opportunities, achievement, and choice: Women and minority students in science and mathematics. Review of Research in Education, 16, 153-222.
50. Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1995). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics performances: The need for specificity of assessment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 190-198.
51. Primack, R. B., & O'Leary, V. (1993). Cumulative disadvantages in the careers of women ecologists. BioScience, 43, 158-165.
52. Repetti, R. L. (1987). Individual and common components of the social environment at work and psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 710-720.
53. Roberts, T. (1991). Gender and the influence of evaluations on self-assessments in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 297-308.
54. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55. Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
56. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving. Boulder, CO: Westview.
57. Sonnert, G. (1995-1996). Gender equity in science: Still an elusive goal. Issues in Science and Technology, 12, 53-58.
58. Spencer, S. J., Josephs, R. A., & Steele, C. M. (1993). Low self-esteem: The uphill struggle for self-integrity. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 21-36). New York, NY: Plenum.
59. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. (1999). Under suspicion of inability: Stereotype vulnerability and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28.
60. Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261-302). New York, NY: Academic Press.
61. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
62. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.
63. Stoecker, J., Pascarella, E. T., & Wolfle, L. M. (1988). Persistence in higher education: A 9-year test of a theoretical model. Journal of College Student Development, 29, 196-209.
64. Strenta, A. C., Elliott, R., Adair, R., Malier, M., & Scott, J. (1994). Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions. Research in Higher Education, 35, 513-547.
65. Tice, D. (1991). Esteem protection or enhancement? Self-handicapping motives and attributions differ by trait self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 711-725.
66. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115-191.
67. Vetter, B. M. (1994). Professional women and minorities: A total human resource data compendium (11th ed.). Washington, DC: Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology.
68. Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C. (1986). Perceived support, received support, and adjustment to stressful life events. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27, 78-89.
69. Widnall, S. E. (1988, February). AAAS presidential lecture: Voices from the pipeline. Science, 241, 1740-1745.
70. Wylie, R. C. (1974). The self-concept. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
71. Wylie, R. C. (1979). The self-concept (Vol. 2). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
72. Zuckerman, H. (1991). The careers of men and women scientists: A review of current research. In H. Zuckerman, J. R. Cole, & J. T. Bruer (Eds.), The outer circle: Women in the scientific community (pp. 27-56). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.