Bone Interface of Dental Implants Cytologically Influenced by a Modified Sandblasted Surface: A Preliminary in Vitro Study

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 132-138

  Li, Dehua ^a   Liu, Baolin ^a   Wu, Junzheng ^a   Chen, Jianyuan ^a  

^a Qindu Stomatological College   (China)

Author keywords

Dental implant; Osteoblast; Surface treatment; Titanium

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELLS, CULTURED; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOBLASTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 0035223991     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-200104000-00010     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, et al. A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-359.
2. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
3. Lekholm U, van Steenberghe D, Herrmann I, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous jaws: A prospective 5-year multi-center study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:627-635.
4. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part I: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172.
5. Brånemark P-I, Breine U, Adell R, et al. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100.
6. Albrektsson T. On long-term maintenance of the osseointegrated response. Aust Prosthodont J 1993;7:15-24.
7. Ratner BD, Johnston AB, Lenk TJ. Biomaterial surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:59-90.
8. Wilke H-J, Class L, Steinemann S. The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone. In: Heimke G, Soltesz U, Lee AJC eds. Clinical Implant Materials 1990. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV; 1990: 309-314.
9. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, et al. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902.
10. 2blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: An experimental study with rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1223-1231.
11. Li D-H, Liu B-L, Man Yong, et al. Effects of a modified sandblasting surface treatment on topographic and chemical properties of titanium surface. Implant Dent 2001;10:59-64.
12. Li D-H, Liu B-L, Zou J-C, et al. The histological study of the effects of modified sandblasting surface treatment on the osseointegration of titanium dental implant. Pract J Stomatology 1999;15:431-433 (in Chinese).
13. Li D-H, Liu B-L, Zou J-C, et al. Improvement of osseointegration of titanium dental implants by a modified sandblasting surface treatment: An interfacial biomechanical in vivo study. Implant Dent 1999;8:289-294.
14. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, et al. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:389-401.
15. 3. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;39:77-85.
16. Li D-H, Liu B-L. New experimental model to study the bone interface of endosseous implants: An in vitro three-dimensional model of cell culture. Implant Dent 1999;8:120-125.
17. Li D-H, Liu B-L, Wu J-Z, et al. The primary culture and the identification of human fetal osteoblasts. Chinese J Conservative Dent 1998;8:92-94 (in Chinese).
18. Thomas KA, Kay JF, Cook SD, et al. The effect of surface macrotexture and hydroxylapatite coating on the mechanical strengths and histological profiles of titanium implant materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:1395-1414.
19. Schwartz Z, Martin JY, Dean DD, et al. Effect of titanium surface roughness on chondrocyte proliferation, matrix production, and differentiation depends on the state of cell maturation. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;30:145-155.
20. Kieswetter K, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, et al. Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;32:55-63.
21. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, et al. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:156-1575.
22. Schroeder A, van der Zypen E, Stich H, et al. The reaction of bone, connective tissue and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. J Maxilllofac Surg 1981;9:15-25.