Epidural and spinal analgesia and labour

Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 583-587

  Thallon, Angeli ^a   Shennan, Andrew ^a  

^a ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUPIVACAINE; DIAMORPHINE; FENTANYL; LEVOBUPIVACAINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; MORPHINE; OPIATE; OXYTOCIN; ROPIVACAINE; SUFENTANIL;

ANESTHESIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; BOLUS INJECTION; CARDIOTOXICITY; CLINICAL TRIAL; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG CHOICE; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG POTENCY; DRUG PROTEIN BINDING; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABOR; METHODOLOGY; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING; NEUROTOXICITY; OBSTETRIC ANALGESIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPINAL ANESTHESIA;

ANESTHESIA, EPIDURAL; ANESTHESIA, OBSTETRICAL; ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; NARCOTICS; PREGNANCY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 0035193738     PISSN: 1040872X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001703-200112000-00006     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. A survey of epidural analgesia for labour in the United Kingdom
2. Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour
3. A randomised controlled trial of epidural compared with non-epidural analgesia in labour
4. Effect of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor
5. Occipitoposterior position: Associated factors and obstetric outcome in nulliparas
6. Ethics and clinical research in obstetric anaesthesia
7. The effect of a rapid change in availability of epidural analgesia on the cesarean delivery rate: A meta-analysis
8. Randomized controlled comparison of epidural bupivacaine versus pethidine for analgesia in labour
9. Epidural analgesia during labour
10. Ropivacaine: An update of its use in regional anaesthesia
11. Ropivacaine, 0.1%, plus sufentanil, 0.5 μg/ml, versus bupivacaine, 0.1%, plus sufentanil, 0.5 μg/ml, using patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor
12. Comparison of ropivacaine 0.1%-fentanyl and bupivacaine 0.125%-fentanyl infusions for epidural labour analgesia
13. Ambulatory labor epidural analgesia: Bupivacaine versus ropivacaine
14. A comparison of 0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl and 0.1% ropivacaine with fentanyl for continuous epidura[ labor analgesia
15. Levobupivacaine: A review of its pharmacology and use as a local anaesthetic
16. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: A randomised controlled trial
17. The effect of adding fentanyl to ropivacaine 0.125% on patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour
18. Minimum local analgesic dose of plain ropivacaine versus ropivacaine combined with sufentanil during epidural analgesia for labour
19. The addition of morphine prolongs fentanylbupivacaine spinal analgesia for the relief of labor pain
20. Choice of opioid for initiation of combined spinal epidural analgesia in labour: Fentanyl or diamorphine
21. Comparison of epidural fentanyl versus epidural sufentanil for analgesia in ambulatory patients in early labor
22. Intrathecal narcotics are associated with prolonged second stage labor and increased oxytocin use
23. Fetal heart rate abnormalities after regional analgesia for labor pain: The effect of intrathecal opioids
24. Speed of onset of regional analgesia in labour: A comparison of the epidural and spinal routes
25. Long-term morbidity following dural puncture in an obstetric population
26. Mortality from peripartum meningitis
27. Ropivacaine 1 mg/ml, plus fentanyl 2 μg/ml for epidural analgesia during labour. Is mode of administration important?
28. Epidural analgesia need not increase operative delivery rates
29. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural analgesia
30. Epidural analgesia compared with combined spinal-epidural analgesia during labor in nulliparous women