Evaluation of stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNB) of the breast at a single institution

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 277-283

  Latosinsky, Steven ^a   Cornell, David ^a   Bear, Harry D ^a,c   Karp, Stephen E ^a   Little, Sherrill ^b   De Paredes, Ellen ^b  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasm; Mammography; Review; Stereotactic core needle biopsy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; CANCER SURGERY; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0033944680     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1006449319179     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. 1. Bassett L, Winchester DP, Caplan RB, et al.: Stereotactic coreneedle biopsy of the breast: a report of the Joint Task Force of the American College of Radiology, American College of Surgeons, and College of American Pathologists. CA-A Cancer J Clin 47: 171-190, 1997
2. 2. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al.: Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 193: 359-364, 1994
3. 3. Bauer RL, Sung J, Eckhert KH, Koul A, Castillo NB, Nemoto T: Comparison of histologic diagnosis between stereotactic core needle biopsy and open surgical biopsy. Annals Surg Oncol 4: 316-320, 1997
4. 4. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, et al.: Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology 176: 741-747, 1999
5. 5. Elvecrog EL, Lechner MC, Nelson MT: Nonpalpable breast lesions: correlation of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy and surgical biopsy results. Radiology 188: 453-455, 1993
6. 6. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Burke BJ, Hopper KD, Yakes WF: Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology 180: 403-407, 1991
7. 7. Gisvold JJ, Goellner JR, Grant CS, et al.: Breast biopsy: a comparative study of stereotactically guided core and excisional techniques. Am J Radiol 162: 815-820, 1994
8. 8. Cross MJ, Evans WP, Peters GN, Cheek JH, Jones RC, Krakos P: Stereotactic breast biopsy as an alternative to open excixional biopsy. Annals Surg Oncol 2: 195-200, 1995
9. 9. Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds JW, et al.: Open versus sterotactic breast biopsy. Am J Surg 172: 491-493, 1996
10. 10. Bernstein JR: Role of stereotactic breast biopsy. Semin Surg Oncol 12: 299, 1996
11. 11. Mitnick JS, Vazquez MF, Pressman PI, Harris MN, Roses DF: Stereotactic fine-needle aspiration biopsy for the evaluation of non-palpable breast lesions: report of an experience based on 2,988 cases. Annals Surg Oncol 3: 185-191, 1996
12. 12. Burbank F: Stereotactic breast biopsy: its history, its present, and its future. Am Surg 62: 128-150, 1996
13. 13. Kopans DB: Caution on core (letter). Radiology 193: 325-326, 1994
14. 14. Vetto JT: (invited commentary). World J Surg 21: 798, 1997
15. 15. Stolier AJ: Stereotactic breast biopsy: a surgical series. J Am College Surg 185: 224-228, 1997
16. 16. Park S, Galbo C, Ghosh BC: Stereotactic breast biopsy as an alternative to excisional biopsy. World J Surg 21: 794-798, 1997
17. 17. Pettine S, Place R, Babu S, Williard W, Kim D, Carter P: Stereotactic breast biopsy is accurate, minimally invasive, and cost effective. Am J Surg 171: 474-476, 1996
18. 18. Devia A, Murray KA, Nelson EW: Stereotactic core needle biopsy and the workup of mammographic breast lesions. Archives Surg 132: 512-516, 1997
19. 19. Israel PZ: The revolution in breast biopsy: where is the surgeon? Am Surg 62: 93-95, 1996
20. 20. Taft R, Chao K, Dear P, King C: The role of core biopsy in the diagnosis of mammographically detected lesions. Australian New Zealand J Surg 66: 664-667, 1996
21. 21. Nguyen M, McCombs MM, Ghandehari S, et al: An update in core needle biopsy for radiologically detected breast lesions. Cancer 78: 2340-2345, 1996
22. 22. Bear HD: Image-guided breast biopsy - how, when, and by whom? J Surg Oncol 67: 1-5, 1998
23. 23. Dershaw DD, Liberman L: Stereotactic breast biopsy: indications and results. Oncology 12: 907-916, 1998
24. 24. Seoudi H, Mortier J, Basile R, Curletti E: Stereotactic core needle biopsy of needle biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions. Archives Surg 133: 366-372, 1998
25. 25. Brenner RJ, Sickles EA: Surveillance mammography and stereotactic core breast biopsy for probably benign lesions: a cost comparison analysis. Acad Radiol 4: 419-425, 1997
26. 26. Sickles EA: Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3184 consecutive cases. Radiology 179: 463-468, 1991
27. 27. Lindfors KK, O'Connor J, Acredolo CR, et al.: Short-interval follow-up mammography versus immediate core biopsy of benign breast lesions: assessment of patient stress. Am J Roentgenol 171: 55-58, 1998
28. 28. Brown TA, Wall JW, Christensen ED, et al.: Atypical hyperplasia in the era of stereotactic core needle biopsy. J Surg Oncol 67: 168-173, 1998
29. 29. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al.: Response to "Caution on Core" (letter). Radiology 193: 326-327, 1994
30. 30. Burbank F: Mammographic findings after 14-guage automated needle and 14-guage directional, vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsies. Radiology 204: 153-156, 1997
31. 31. Frazee RC: (invited commentary). Oncology 12: 916, 1998