Influence of cataract surgery on automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 132, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 41-46

  Hayashi, Ken ^a   Hayashi, Hideyuki ^b   Nakao, Fuminori ^a   Hayashi, Fumihiko ^a  

^a Hayashi Eye Hospital   (Japan)

^b FUKUOKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCOTOMA; TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CAPSULORHEXIS; CATARACT; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, ANGLE-CLOSURE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOTOMA; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0034955544     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(01)00920-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Heiji A, Drance SM. A clinical comparison of three computerized automatic perimeters in the detection of glaucoma defects. Arch Ophthalmol 1981;99:832-836.
2. Hotchikiss ML, Robin AL, Quigley HA, Pollack IP. A comparison of Peritest automated perimetry and Goldmann perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:397-403.
3. Heiji A, Lindgren G, Lindgren A, et al. Extended empirical statistical package for evaluation of single and multiple fields in glaucoma: Statpac-2. In: Mills RP, Heiji A, editors. Perimetry update 1990/1991. Amsterdam: Kugler and Ghedini, 1991:303-315.
4. Chauhan BC, Drance SM, Douglas GR. The use of visual field indices in detecting changes in the visual field in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31:512-520.
5. Noureddin BN, Poinoosawmy D, Fietzke FW, Hitchings RA. Regression analysis of visual field progression in low tension glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1991;75:493-495.
6. Wild JM, Hussey MK, Flanagan JG, Trope GE. Pointwise topographical and longitudinal modeling of visual field in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:1907-1916.
7. Smith SD, Katz J, Quigley HA. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996;37:1419-1428.
8. Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, Poinoosawmy D, McNaught AI, Crabb DP. Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:40-48.
9. Brigatti L, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Weitzman M, Caprioli J. Automatic detection of glaucomatous visual field progression with neural networks. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:725-728.
10. Morgan RK, Feuer WJ, Anderson DR. Statpac 2 glaucoma change probability. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1690-1692.
11. Birch MK, Wishhart P, O'Donnell NP. Determining progressive visual field loss in serial Humphrey visual field. Ophthalmology 1995;102:1227-1235.
12. Katz J, Gilbert D, Quigley HA, Sommer A. Estimating progression of visual field loss in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1017-1025.
13. Nouri-Mahdavi K, Brigatti L, Weitzman M, Caprioli J. Comparison of methods to detect visual field progression in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1228-1236.
14. Heiji A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. A package for the statistical analysis of visual field. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1987;49: 153-168.
15. Guthauser U, Flammer J. Quantifying visual field damage caused by cataract. Am J Ophthalmol 1988;106:480-484.
16. Heuer DK, Anderson DR, Knighton RW, Feuer WJ, Gressel MG. The influence of simulated light scattering on automated perimetric threshold measurements. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:1247-1251.
17. Budentz DL, Feuer WJ, Anderson DR. The effect of simulated cataract on the glaucomatous visual field. Ophthalmology 1993;100:511-517.
18. Lam BL, Alward WLM, Kolder HE. Effect of cataract on automated perimetry. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1066-1070.
19. Stewart WC, Rogers GM, Crinkley CMC, Carlson AN. Effect of cataract extraction on automated fields in chronic open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:875-879.
20. Smith SD, Katz J, Quigley HA. Effect of cataract extraction on the results of automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:1515-1519.