|
Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 705-708
|
Endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in abdominal pain: What makes sense?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ABDOMINAL DISCOMFORT;
ABDOMINAL PAIN;
BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT;
CANNULATION;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DYSPEPSIA;
EDITORIAL;
ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY;
ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY;
FOLLOW UP;
HEALTH CARE ACCESS;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HEALTH CARE FACILITY;
HEALTH CARE SYSTEM;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY;
MORBIDITY;
MORTALITY;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
OPTICAL RESOLUTION;
PANCREAS DISEASE;
PANCREATITIS;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
WORKLOAD;
ABDOMINAL PAIN;
CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE;
ENDOSCOPY, DIGESTIVE SYSTEM;
ENDOSONOGRAPHY;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
|
EID: 0034907348
PISSN: 0013726X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-16226 Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (18)
|