Spin relaxation quenching in semiconductor quantum dots

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 86, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 1634-1637

  Paillard, M ^a   Marie, X ^a   Renucci, P ^a   Amand, T ^a   Jbeli, A ^a   Gerard J M ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b ORANGE LABS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; EXCITONS; GROUND STATE; LIGHT POLARIZATION; MOLECULAR BEAM EPITAXY; PHOTOLUMINESCENCE; RELAXATION PROCESSES; SEMICONDUCTING GALLIUM ARSENIDE; SEMICONDUCTING INDIUM COMPOUNDS;

INDIUM ARSENIDE; SPIN RELAXATION QUENCHING;

SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

EID: 0034836171     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1634     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Optical Orientation, edited by F. Meier and B. Zakharchenya, Modern Problems in Condensed Matter Sciences Vol. 8 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984).
2. M. Z. Maialle et al., Phys. Rev. B 47, 15 776 (1993).
3. M. Chamaro et al., J. Lumin. 70, 222 (1996).
4. A. V. Khaetskii et al., Physica (Amsterdam) E6, 470 (2000).
5. R. Fiederling et al., Nature (London) 402, 787 (1999).
6. A. Imamoglu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4204 (1999); G. Burkard et al., Phys. Rev. B 59, 2070 (1999).
7. A. Imamoglu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4204 (1999); G. Burkard et al., Phys. Rev. B 59, 2070 (1999).
8. J. A. Gupta et al., Phys. Rev. B 59, R10421 (1999).
9. D. Gammon et al., Science 273, 87 (1996).
10. M. Bayer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1748 (1999).
11. H. Gotoh et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 1341 (1998).
12. M. Paillard et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 76 (2000).
13. B. Deveaud et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2355 (1991).
14. A. Vinattieri et al., Phys. Rev. B 50, 10 868 (1994).
15. J. M. Gérard et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1110 (1998).
16. X. Marie et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3222 (1997).
17. We did not notice any change in the presented effects when the excitation/detection energy was set to another value within the QD ground state energy distribution.
18. T. Amand et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1355 (1997).
19. E. L. Ivchenko, Pure Appl. Chem. 67, 463 (1995); R. I. Dzhioev et al., Phys. Solid State 40, 790 (1998).
20. E. L. Ivchenko, Pure Appl. Chem. 67, 463 (1995); R. I. Dzhioev et al., Phys. Solid State 40, 790 (1998).
21. S. Hameau et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4152 (1999).
22. R. I. Dzhioev et al., Phys. Rev. B 56, 13 405 (1997); C. Gourdon et al., Phys. Rev. B 46, 4644 (1992).
23. R. I. Dzhioev et al., Phys. Rev. B 56, 13 405 (1997); C. Gourdon et al., Phys. Rev. B 46, 4644 (1992).
24. S. Sauvage et al., Phys. Rev. B 60, 15 589 (1999).
25. We use a superconducting coil immersed in superfluid He (B ≤ 5 T).
26. - polarized (for a fixed magnetic field direction). This proves that the influence of the nuclear spin on the carrier polarization can be neglected in our measurement conditions.
27. A. Malinowski et al., Solid State Commun. 114, 419 (2000).
28. S. W. Brown et al., Phys. Rev. B 54, R17339 (1996).