Review of methods for input/output selection

Automatica

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 487-510

  Van De Wal, Marc ^a   De Jager, Bram ^b  

^a PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTUATORS; CONTROLLABILITY; OBSERVABILITY; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SENSORS;

RELATIVE GAIN ARRAYS;

CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS;

EID: 0034836114     PISSN: 00051098     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0005-1098(00)00181-3     Document Type: Short Survey

References (115)

1. Aarts, E. H. L., & Lenstra, J. K. (Eds.) (1997). Local search in combinatorial optimization. Chichester: Wiley-Interscience.
2. Al-Sulaiman, & Zaman, S. (1994). Actuator placement in lumped parameter systems subjected to disturbance. Computers & Structures, 52(1), 41-47.
3. Andersson, M. (1997). Noise robust actuator placement on flexible structures. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (pp. 1958-1959).
4. Balas, G. J., & Young, P. M. (1999). Sensor selection via closed-loop control objectives. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 7(6), 692-705.
5. Banerjee, A., & Arkun, Y. (1995). Control configuration design applied to the Tennessee Eastman plant-wide control problem. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 19(4), 453-480.
6. Bequette, B. W., & Edgar, T. F. (1986). The equivalence of non-interacting control system design methods in distillation. Proceedings of American Control Conference, vol. 1 (pp. 31-37).
7. Biss, D., & Perkins, J. D. (1993). Application of input-output controllability analysis to chemical processes. Proceedings of European Control Conference, vol. 2 (pp. 1056-1059).
8. Braatz, R. D. (1993). Robust loopshaping for process control. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology.
9. Braatz, R. D., Lee, J. H., & Morari, M. (1996). Screening plant designs and control structures for uncertain systems. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 20(4), 463-468.
10. Bristol, E. H. (1966). On a new measure of interaction for multivariable process control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 11, 133-134.
11. Cao, Y. (1995). Control structure selection for chemical processes using input-output controllability analysis. Ph.D. thesis, University of Exeter, UK.
12. Cao, Y., & Biss, D. (1996). New screening techniques for choosing manipulated variables. Proceedings of IFAC World Congress. vol. M (pp. 103-108).
13. Cao, Y., Biss, D., & Perkins, J. D. (1996). Assessment of input-output controllability in the presence of control constraints. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 20(4), 337-346.
14. Cao, Y., & Rossiter, D. (1996). Input screening method for disturbance rejection. UKACC International Conference on CONTROL, vol. 1 (pp. 497-502).
15. Cao, Y., Rossiter, D., & Owens, D. (1997), Measurement selection for partially controlled systems. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 1 (pp. 66-71).
16. Chang, J.-W., & Yu, C.-C. (1990). The relative gain for non-square multivariable systems. Chemical Engineering Science, 45(5), 1309-1323.
17. Chen, J., Freudenberg, J. S., & Nett, C. N. (1994). The role of the condition number and the relative gain array in robustness analysis. Automatica, 30(6), 1029-1035.
18. Daoutidis, P., & Kravaris, C. (1992). Structural evaluation of control configurations for multivariable nonlinear processes. Chemical Engineering Science, 47(5), 1091-1107.
19. De Jager, B., & Toker, O. (1998). Complexity of input output selection. In A. Beghi, L. Finesso, & G. Picci (Eds.), Proceedings of International Symposium on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, Il Polygrafo, Padova (pp. 597-600), Padova: Polygrafo.
20. De Jager, B., Van de Wal, M., & Kamidi, R. (1998). Large-scale rigorous actuator and sensor selection. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (pp. 4314-4319).
21. Demetriou, M. A., & Fahroo, F. (1999). Optimal location of actuators for control of a 2-D structural acoustic model. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (pp. 4290-4295).
22. Figueroa, J., Romagnoli, J., & Barton, G. (1992). Robust control indicators in process design and control. In J.D. Perkins (Ed.), Preprints IFAC Workshop on Interactions Between Process Design and Process Control (pp. 139-144). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
23. Freudenberg, J. S., & Looze, D. P. (1985). Right half plane poles and zeros and design tradeoffs in feedback systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 30(6), 555-565.
24. Gawronski, W., & Lim, K. B. (1996). Balanced actuator and sensor placement for flexible structures. International Journal of Control, 65(1), 131-145.
25. Georges, D. (1995). The use of observability and controllability Gramians or functions for optimal sensor and actuator location in finite-dimensional systems. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 4 (pp. 3319-3324).
26. Georgiou, A., & Floudas, C. A. (1989). Structural analysis and synthesis of feasible control schemes: Theory and applications. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 67, 600-618.
27. ∞-norm bound and relations to risk sensitivity. Systems & Control Letters, 11, 167-172.
28. Goodwin, G. C., & Seron, M. M. (1995). Complementarity constraints for nonlinear systems. Preprints IFAC Nonlinear Control Systems Design Symposium, vol. 2 (pp. 771-776).
29. Govind, R., & Powers, G. J. (1982). Control system synthesis strategies. A.I.Ch.E Journal, 28(1), 60-73.
30. Hać, A. (1995). Distribution of actuators in vibration control of adaptive structures. Proceedings of American control conference, vol. 6 (pp. 4295-4299).
31. Hać, A., & Liu, L. (1993). Sensor and actuator location in motion control of flexible structures. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 167(2), 239-261.
32. Hansen, J. E., Heath, J., & Jørgensen, S. B. (1996). Control structure selection for energy integrated distillation column. Proceedings of UKACC International Conference on CONTROL, vol. 1 (pp. 509-514).
33. Hassibi, A., How, J. P., & Boyd, S. P. (1998). Low-authority controller design via convex optimization. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol. 1 (pp. 140-145).
34. Havre, K., Morud, J., & Skogestad, S. (1996). Selection of feedback variables for implementing optimizing control schemes. Proceedings of UKACC International Conference on CONTROL, vol. 1 (pp. 491-496).
35. Havre, K., & Skogestad, S. (1996). Effect of RHP zeros and poles on performance in multivariable systems. Proceedings of UKACC International Conference on CONTROL, vol. 2 (pp. 930-935).
36. Heath, J., Perkins, J., & Walsh, S. (1996). Control structure selection based on linear dynamic economics: Multiloop PI structures for multiple disturbances. Proceedings of IFAC World Congress, vol. M (pp. 85-90).
37. Hendricks, G. J., & Gysling, D. L. (1994). Theoretical study of sensor-actuator schemes for rotating stall control. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 10(1), 101-109.
38. Hoskin, R. F., Nett, C. N., & Reeves, D. E. (1991). Control configuration design for a mixed vectored thrust ASTOVL aircraft in hover. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference (pp. 1625-1642).
39. Hovd, M., & Skogestad, S. (1992a). Controllability analysis for unstable processes. In: J. D. Perkins (Ed.), Preprints IFAC Workshop Interactions Between Process Design and Process Control (pp. 49-54). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
40. Hovd, M., & Skogestad, S. (1992b). Simple frequency-dependent tools for control system analysis, structure selection and design. Automatica, 25(5), 989-996.
41. Hovd, M., & Skogestad, S. (1993). Procedure for regulatory control structure selection with application to the FCC process. A.I.Ch.E. Journal, 39(12), 1938-1953.
42. Isidori, A. (1995). Nonlinear control systems (3rd ed.). Berlin: Springer.
43. Joseph, B., & Brosilow, C. B. (1978). Inferential control of processes - Part I: Steady state analysis and design. A.I.Ch.E. Journal, 24(3), 485-492.
44. Kammer, D. C. (1996). Optimal sensor placement for modal identification using system-realization methods. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 19(3), 729-731.
45. Katsikas, S. K., Tsahalis, D., Manolas, D., & Xanthakis, S. (1995). A genetic algorithm for active noise control actuator positioning. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 9(6), 697-705.
46. Keller, J. P., & Bonvin, D. (1987). Selection of inputs for the purpose of model reduction and controller design. Proceedings of IFAC World Congress (pp. 209-214).
47. Kinnaert, M. (1995). Interaction measures and pairing of controlled and manipulated variables for multi-input multi-output systems: A survey. Journal A, 36(4), 15-23.
48. Ko, B., Tongue, B. H., & Packard, A. (1994). A method for determining the optimal location of a distributed sensor/actuator. Shock and Vibration, 1(4), 357-374.
49. Kosut, R. L., & Kabuli, M. G. (1995). On actuator-sensor selection in thermal processes. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (pp. 2482-2483).
50. Kumar, S., & Seinfeld, J. H. (1978). Optimal location of measurements in tubular reactors. Chemical Engineering Science, 33, 1507-1516.
51. Lee, A.-C., & Chen, S.-T. (1994). Collocated sensor/actuator positioning and feedback design in the control of flexible structure system. ASME Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 116(2), 146-154.
52. Lee, J. H. (1991). Robust inferential control: A methodology for control structure selection and inferential control system design in the presence of model/plant mismatch. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology.
53. Lee, J. H., Braatz, R. D., Morari, M., & Packard, A. (1995). Screening tools for robust control structure selection. Automatica, 31(2), 229-235.
54. Lee, J. H., & Morari, M. (1991). Robust measurement selection. Automatica, 27(3), 519-527.
55. Lee, Y. J., & Speyer, J. L. (1993). Zero locus of a beam with varying sensor and actuator locations. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 16(1), 21-25.
56. Lim, K. B. (1997). Disturbance rejection approach to actuator and sensor placement. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 20(1), 202-204.
57. Lin, X., Newell, R. B., Douglas, P. L., & Mallick, S. K. (1994). Application of output structural controllability to a thermally integrated distillation sequence. International Journal of Systems Science, 25(9), 1437-1459.
58. Lin, X., Tade, M. O., & Newelll, R. B. (1991). Output structural controllability condition for the synthesis of control systems for chemical processes. International Journal of Systems Science, 22(1), 107-132.
59. Luyben, W. L., Tyréus, B. D., & Luyben, M. L. (1998). Plantwide process control. New York: McGraw-Hill.
60. Mellefont, D. J., & Sargent, R. W. H. (1977). Optimal measurement policies for control purposes. International Journal of Control, 26(4), 595-602.
61. Montazeri-Gh, M., Allerton, D. J., & Elder, R. L. (1996). Actuator placement for active surge control in a multi-stage compressor. Proceedings of International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress & Exhibition, Paper no. 96-GT-241.
62. Moore, B. C. (1981). Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 26(1), 17-32.
63. Moore, C., Hackney, J., & Carter, D. (1987). Selecting sensor location and type for multivariable processes. Proceedings of Shell Process Control Workshop (pp. 291-308).
64. Morari, M. (1983). Design of resilient processing plants - III: A general framework for the assessment of dynamic resilience. Chemical Engineering Science, 38(11), 1881-1891.
65. Morari, M. (1992). Effect of design on the controllability of chemical plants. In J. D. Perkins (Ed.), Preprints IFAC Workshop Interactions Between Process Design and Process Control (pp. 3-16). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
66. Morari, M., Arkun, Y., & Stephanopoulos, G. (1980). Studies in the synthesis of control structures for chemical processes. A.I.Ch.E. Journal, 26(2), 220-231.
67. Morari, M., & Stephanopoulos, G. (1980a). Studies in the synthesis of control structures for chemical processes - Part II: Structural aspects and the synthesis of alternative feasible control schemes. A.I.Ch.E. Journal, 26(2), 232-246.
68. Morari, M., & Stephanopoulos, G. (1980b). Studies in the synthesis of control structures for chemical processes - Part III: Optimal selection of secondary measurements within the framework of state estimation in the presence of persistent unknown disturbances. A.I.Ch.E. Journal, 26(2), 247-260.
69. Müller, P. C., & Weber, H. I. (1972). Analysis and optimization of certain qualities of controllability and observability for linear dynamical systems. Automatica, 8(3), 237-246.
70. Narraway, L. T., & Perkins, J. D. (1993). Selection of process control structure based on linear dynamic economics. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 32(11), 2681-2692.
71. Nett, C. N. (1989). A quantitative approach to the selection and partitioning of measurements and manipulations for the control of complex systems. Presentation at Caltech Control Workshop.
72. Nett, C. N., & Manousiouthakis, V. (1987). Euclidean condition and block relative gain: Connections, conjectures, and clarifications. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 32(5), 405-407.
73. Nijmeijer, H., & Van der Schaft, A. (1990). Nonlinear dynamical control systems. New York: Springer.
74. Nishida, N., Stephanopoulos, G., & Westerberg, A. W. (1981). A review of process synthesis. A.I.Ch.E. Journal, 27(3), 321-351.
75. Norris, G. A., & Skelton, R. E. (1989). Selection of dynamic sensors and actuators in the control of linear systems. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 111(3), 389-397.
76. Reeves, D. E. (1991). A comprehensive approach to control configuration design for complex systems. Ph.D. thesis. Georgia Institute of Technology.
77. Reeves, D. E., Nett, C. N., & Arkun, Y. (1991). Control configuration design toolbox for use with MATLAB.
78. Rhodes, C., & Morari, M. (1995). Determining the model order of nonlinear input/output systems directly from data. Proceedings of American Control Conference, vol. 3 (pp. 2190-2194).
79. Rivera, D. E. (1989). A structured singular value test for variable selection and pairing. Proceedings of American Control Conference, vol. 1 (pp. 560-565).
80. Rivera, D. E., Desai, A., Beaumariage, T., & Roberts, C. (1993). A knowledge-based framework for controller structure selection in intelligent process control. Proceedings of American Control Conference, vol. 2 (pp. 1890-1894).
81. Roh, H.-S., & Park, Y. (1997). Actuator and exciter placement for flexible structures. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 20(5), 850-856.
82. Ross, R., & Swartz, C. L. E. (1997). Inclusion of model uncertainty in a computational framework for dynamic operability assessment. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 21, S415-S420.
83. Ruckman, C. E., & Fuller, C. R. (1995). Optimizing actuator locations in active noise control systems using subset selection. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 186(3), 395-406.
84. Russell, L. W., & Perkins, J. D. (1987). Towards a method for diagnosis of controllability and operability problems in chemical plants. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 65, 453-461.
85. Samar, R., & Postlethwaite, I. (1994). Multivariable controller design for a high performance aero-engine. Proceedings of International Conference on CONTROL, vol. 2 (pp. 1312-1317).
86. Schmitendorf, W. E. (1984). An exact expression for computing the degree of controllability. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 7(4), 502-504.
87. Seborg, D. E., Edgar, T. F., & Mellichamp, D. A. (1989). Process dynamics and control. New York: Wiley.
88. Seto, K., & Mitsuta, S. (1994). A new method for making a reduced-order model of flexible structures using unobservability and uncontrollability and its application in vibration control. JSME International Journal, Series C, 57(3), 444-449.
89. Sidi, M. (1997). Gain-bandwidth limitations of feedback systems with non-minimum-phase plants. International Journal of Control, 67(5), 731-743.
90. Simon, J. S., Valavani, L., Epstein, A. H., & Greitzer, E. M. (1993). Evaluation of approaches to active compressor surge stabilization. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 115, 57-67.
91. Skogestad, S., & Morari, M. (1987a). Effect of disturbance directions on closed-loop performance. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 26(10), 2029-2035.
92. Skogestad, S., & Morari, M. (1987b). Implications of large RGA elements on control performance. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 26(11), 2323-2330.
93. Skogestad, S., & Morari, M. (1988). Some new properties of the structured singular value. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 33(12), 1151-1154.
94. Skogestad, S., & Postlethwaite, I. (1996). Multivariable feedback control: Analysis and design. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
95. Soroush, M. (1996). Evaluation of achievable control quality in nonlinear processes. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 20(4), 357-364.
96. Trierweiler, J. O. (1997). A systematic approach to control structure design. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Dortmund.
97. Trierweiler, J. O., & Engell, S. (1997). The robust performance number: A new tool for control structure design. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 21, S409-S414.
98. Tzouanas, V. K., Luyben, W. L., Georgakis, C., & Ungar, L. H. (1990). Expert multivariable control. 1. Structure and design methodology. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 29(3), 382-389.
99. Van de Wal, M. (1995). A survey of methods for control structure design. Technical Report WFW 98.007. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology.
100. Van de Wal, M. (1998). Selection of inputs and outputs for control. Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology.
101. Van de Wal, M., & De Jager, B. (1995). Control structure design: A survey. Proceedings of American Control Conference, vol. 1 (pp. 225-229).
102. Van de Wal, M., & De Jager, B. (1996). Selection of sensors and actuators for an active suspension control problem. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference Control Applications (pp. 55-60).
103. Van de Wal, M., & De Jager, B. (1997). Selection of sensors and actuators based on a sufficient condition for robust performance. Proceedings of European Control Conference.
104. Van de Wal, M., & De Jager, B. (1998). Input/output selection for robust control. Proceedings of UKACC International Conference on CONTROL, vol. 2 (pp. 1023-1028).
105. Van de Wal, M., Philips, P., & De Jager, B. (1998). Actuator and sensor selection for an active vehicle suspension aimed at robust performance. International Journal of Control, 70(5), 703-720.
106. Van de Wal, M., Willems, F., & De Jager, B. (1997). Selection of actuators and sensors for active surge control. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference Control Aapplications (pp. 121-126).
107. 2-gain and passivity techniques in nonlinear control. Heidelberg: Springer.
108. Vander Velde, W. E., & Carignan, C. R. (1984). Number and placement of control system components considering possible failures. Journal of Guidance, Control, Dynamics, 7(6), 703-709.
109. Weber, R., & Brosilow, C. (1972). The use of secondary measurements to improve control. A.I.Ch.E. Journal, 18(3), 614-623.
110. Weitz, O., & Lewin, D. R. (1996). Dynamic controllability and resiliency diagnosis using steady state process flowsheet data. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 20(4), 325-335.
111. Wolff, E. A., Skogestad, S., Hovd, M., & Mathisen, K. W. (1992). A procedure for controllability analysis. In: J.D. Perkins (Ed.), Preprints IFAC workshop interactions between process design and process control (pp. 127-132). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
112. Xu, K., Warnitchai, P., & Igusa, T. (1994). Optimal placement and gains of sensors and actuators for feedback control. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 17(5), 929-934.
113. Yu, C.-C., & Luyben, W. L. (1986). Design of multiloop SISO controllers in multivariable processes. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 25(2), 498-503.
114. Zafiriou, E., & Chiou, H.-W. (1996). On the dynamic resiliency of constrained processes. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 20(4), 347-355.
115. Zhou, K., Doyle, J. C., & Glover, K. (1996). Robust and optimal control. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.