Screening plant designs and control structures for uncertain systems

Computers and Chemical Engineering

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 463-468

  Braatz, R D ^a   Lee, J H ^b   Morari, M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c California Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL VARIABLES CONTROL; CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS; CONTROL EQUIPMENT; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; DECENTRALIZED CONTROL; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROCESS CONTROL;

CONTROL STRUCTURE; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

CHEMICAL PLANTS;

EID: 0030129722     PISSN: 00981354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0098-1354(95)00036-4     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Balas G. J., J. C. Doyle, K. Glover, A. K. Packard and R. S. R. Smith, μ-Analysis and Synthesis Toolbox (μ-Tools): Matlab Functions for the Analysis and Design of Robust Control Systems. MathWorks, Natick, Mass. (1992).
2. Braatz R. D., Robust loopshaping for process control. Ph.D. thesis, Californa Institute of Technology, Pasadena (1993).
3. Braatz R. D. and M. Morari, Minimizing the Euclidean condition number. SIAM J. Control Optim. 32(6), 1763-1768 (1994).
4. Braatz R. D., M. L. Tyler, M. Morari, F. R. Pranckh and L. Sartor, Identification and cross-directional control of coating processes. AIChE Jl 38, 1329-1339 (1992).
5. Braatz R. D., P. M. Young, J. C. Doyle and M. Morari, Computational complexity of μ calculation. IEEE Trans. Auto. Control 39, 1000-1002 (1994).
6. Davison E. J., The robust decentralized control of a servomechanism problem. IEEE Trans. Auto. Control 21, 14-24 (1976).
7. Doyle J. C. Analysis of feedback systems with structured uncertainties. IEEE Proc. Pt. D 129, 242-250 (1982).
8. Grosdidier P. and M. Morari, The μ-interaction measure. Ind. Engng Chem. Res. 26, 1193-1202 (1987).
9. Guardabassi G. and A. Locatelli, On the initialization problem in the parameter optimization of structurally constrained industrial regulators. Large-Scale Systems 3, 267-277 (1982).
10. Laughlin D., M. Morari and R. D. Braatz, Robust performance of cross-directional basis - weight control in paper machines. Automatica 29, 1395-1410 (1993).
11. Lee J. H. and M. Morari, Robust measurement selection. Automatica 27, 519-527 (1993).
12. Lee J. H., R. D. Braatz, M. Morari and A. Packard, Screening tools for robust control structure selection. Automatica 31, 229-235 (1995).
13. Morari M. and E. Zafiriou, Robust Process Control. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. (1989).
14. Packard A. K., What's new with μ: structured uncertainty in multivariable control. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley (1988).
15. Packard A. and J. C. Doyle, The complex structured singular value. Automatica 29, 71-109 (1993).
16. Packard A. and P. Pandey, Continuity properties of the real/complex structured singular value. IEEE Trans. Auto. Control 38, 415-428 (1993).
17. Poolla K. and A. Tikku, Robust performance against time-varying stuctured perturbations. In Proc. of the Conf. on Decision and Control (1993).
18. Shamma J. S., Necessity of the small-gain ttheorem for time-varying and nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans. Auto. Control 36, 1138-1147 (1991).
19. Skogestad S. and M. Morari, Some new properties of the structured singular value. IEEE Trans. Auto. Control 33, 1151-1154 (1988).
20. Weber R. and C. Brosilow, The use of secondary measurements to improve control. AIChE Jl 18, 614-623 (1972).
21. Young P. M., Robustness with parametric and dynamic uncertainties. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena (1993).