Nondynamic and dynamic kinetic resolution of lactones with stereogenic centers and axes: Stereoselective total synthesis of herbertenediol and mastigophorenes A and B

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 122, Issue 38, 2000, Pages 9127-9133

  Bringmann, Gerhard ^a   Pabst, Thomas ^a   Henschel, Petra ^a   Kraus, Jürgen ^a   Peters, Karl ^b   Peters, Eva Maria ^b   Rycroft, David S ^c   Connolly, Joseph D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR FESTKÖRPERFORSCHUNG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BORANE DERIVATIVE; DIMER; HALOGEN; HERBERTENEDIOL; LACTONE DERIVATIVE; MASTIGOPHORENE A; MASTIGOPHORENE B; OXAZABOROLIDINE DERIVATIVE; SESQUITERPENE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; ENANTIOMER; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; REACTION ANALYSIS; REDUCTION; STEREOCHEMISTRY; SYNTHESIS;

EID: 0034721428     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja001455r     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Strictly speaking such "dimers" should be described as "dehydrodimers".
2. Fukuyama, Y.; Asakawa, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1991, 2737.
3. Skaper, S. D.; Walsh, F. S. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 1998, 12, 179.
4. Bringmann, G.; Pabst, T.; Busemann, S.; Peters, K.; Peters, E.-M. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 1425.
5. Gille, G.; Pabst, T.; Bringmann, G.; Janetzky, B.; Reichmann, H.; Rausch, W.-D. Drug Dev. Res. 2000, 50, 153.
6. Bringmann, G.; Breuning, M.; Tasler, S. Synthesis 1999, 525.
7. Bringmann, G.; Pabst, T.; Rycroft, D. S.; Connolly, J. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 483.
8. Degnan, A. P.; Meyers, A. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2762.
9. Fukuyama, Y.; Kiriyama, Y.; Kodama, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 1261.
10. Weeratunga, G.; Jaworska-Sobiesiak, A.; Home, S.; Rodrigo, R. Can. J. Chem. 1987, 65, 2019.
11. Shiba, T.; Cahnmann, H. J. J. Org. Chem. 1964, 29, 3061.
12. Bringmann, G.; Schneider, S. Synthesis 1983, 139.
13. Klärner, F.-G.; Adamsky, F. Chem. Ber. 1983, 116, 299. The elimination step to ethyl 1,2-dimethyl-cyclopent-2-enoate was done by azeotropic removal of water with toluene and p-toluenesulfonic acid. Subsequent hydrolysis as described gave (rac)-8 in 72% yield (2 steps).
14. Corey, E. J.; Helal, C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 1986.
15. Bringmann, G.; Hinrichs, J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 4121.
16. rel were calculated according to (a) Kagan, H. B.; Fiaud, J. C. Top. Stereochem. 1988, 18, 249.
17. (b) Chen, C-S.; Fujimoto, Y.; Girdaukas, G.; Sih, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 7294.
18. Matsuo, A.; Yuki, S.; Nakayama, M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1986, 701.
19. Bringmann, G.; Hinrichs, J.; Kraus, J.; Wuzik, A.; Schulz, T. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 2517.
20. Bringmann, G.; Vitt, D. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7674.
21. Bringmann, G.; Busemann, S. In Natural Product Analysis; Schreier, P., Herderich, M., Humpf, H.-U., Schwab, W., Eds.; Vieweg: Braunschweig, 1998; pp 195-212.
22. Buchanan, M. S.; Connolly, J. D.; Rycroft, D. S. Phytochemistry 1996, 43, 1245.
23. For the synthesis of related - albeit sterically less hindered-biaryl lactones by other methods, see: (a) Wang, W.; Snieckus, V. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 424. (b) Davies, D. I.; Waring, C. J. Chem. Soc. C 1967, 1639 and references cited therein. de Frutos, O.; Echavarren, A. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8953.
24. For the synthesis of related - albeit sterically less hindered-biaryl lactones by other methods, see: (a) Wang, W.; Snieckus, V. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 424. (b) Davies, D. I.; Waring, C. J. Chem. Soc. C 1967, 1639 and references cited therein. de Frutos, O.; Echavarren, A. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8953.
25. For the synthesis of related - albeit sterically less hindered-biaryl lactones by other methods, see: (a) Wang, W.; Snieckus, V. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 424. (b) Davies, D. I.; Waring, C. J. Chem. Soc. C 1967, 1639 and references cited therein. de Frutos, O.; Echavarren, A. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8953.
26. Bringmann, G., Saeb, W.; Rübenacker, M. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 423.
27. Bringmann, G.; Ochse, M.; Götz, R. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 2069.
28. Bringmann, G.; Walter, R.; Weirich, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 977.
29. Rao, A. V. R.; Chakraborty, T. K.; Joshi, S. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4045.
30. (a) Dyker, G. Chem. Ber./Recl. 1997, 130, 1567.
31. (b) Dyker, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 1698.
32. (c) Dyker, G. Chem. Ber. 1994, 127, 7, 739.
33. -1.
34. Feldman, K. S.; Ensel, S. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3357.
35. (a) Lütolf, W. L.; Prewo, R.; Jost, H.; Rüedi, P.; Eugster, C. H. Helv. Chim. Acta 1985, 860.
36. (b) Kawase, M.; Sinhababu, A. K.; McGhee, E M.; Milby, T.; Borchardt, R. T. J. Med. Chem. 1990, 33, 2204.
37. (31 ) This reaction sequence was first optimized with a simplified model system, bearing a tert-bulyl group instead of the chiral cyclopentyl residue; for the characterization of these compounds see the Supporting Information.
38. (a) Feldman, K. S.; Quideau, S.; Appel, H. M. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 6656.
39. (b) Horie, T.; Tsukayama, M.; Kourai, H.; Nakayama, Y.; Nakayama, M. Chem. Pharm. Bull 1986, 34, 30.
40. (c) Bachi, M. D.; Klein, J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1983, 1925.