El Nino-like climate teleconnections in New England during the late Pleistocene

Science

Volumn 288, Issue 5468, 2000, Pages 1039-1042

  Rittenour, Tammy M ^a,c   Brigham Crette, Julie ^a   Mann, Michael E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EL NINO-SOUTHERN OSCILLATION; GEOCHRONOLOGY; PALEOCLIMATE; PLEISTOCENE; TELECONNECTION; VARVE;

ARTICLE; CHRONOLOGY; CLIMATE; GEOLOGY; OSCILLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECTROSCOPY; UNITED STATES;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034640484     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.288.5468.1039     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. K. E. Trenberth and T. J. Hoar, Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 3057 (1997).
2. T. R. Knutson, S. Manabe, D. Gu, J. Clim. 10, 138 (1997).
3. L. Goddard and N. E. Graham, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 10423 (1997).
4. B. Wang and Y. Wang, J. Clim. 9, 1586 (1996).
5. J. Cole and E. Cook, Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 4529, (1998).
6. M. E. Mann, R. S. Bradley, M. K. Hughes, in El Niño and the Southern Oscillation: Multiscale Variability and Its Impacts on Natural Ecosystems and Society, H. F. Diaz and V. Markgraff, Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, in press).
7. D. W. Stahle et al., Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 79, 2137 (1998).
8. R. B. Dunbar, G. M. Wellington, M. W. Colgan, P. W. Glynn, Paleoceanography 9, 291 (1994).
9. M. K. Gagan et al., Science 279, 1014 (1998).
10. J. Shulmeister and B. G. Lees, Holocene 5, 10 (1995).
11. D. H. Sandweiss. J. B. Richardson III, E. J. Reitz, H. B. Rollins, K. A. Maasch, Science 273, 1531 (1996).
12. T. J. DeVries, L. Ortlieb, A. Diaz, L. Wells, CL Hillaire-Marcel, Science 276, 965 (1997).
13. D. T. Rodbell et al., Science 283, 516 (1999).
14. H. S. Godsey, T. C. Moore Jr., D. K. Rea, L. C. K. Shane, Can. J. Earth Sci. 36, 533 (1999).
15. Z. Lui, R. Jacob, J. Kutzbach, S. Harrison, J. Anderson, PAGES Newsletter 7 (no. 2), 16 (1999).
16. A. C. Clement, R. Seager, M. A. Cane, Paleoceanography 14, 441 (1999).
17. G. M. Ashley, in Glaciofluvial and Glaciolacustrine Sedimentation, A. V. Jopling and C. McDonald, Eds. (Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Tulsa, OK, 1975), pp. 304-320.
18. E. Antevs, Am. Geogr. Soc. Res. Ser. 11, 1 (1922).
19. _, Am. Geogr. Soc. Res. Ser. 17, 1 (1928).
20. M. S. Halpert and C. F. Ropelewski, J. Clim. 5, 577 (1992).
21. J. H. Yin and D. S. Battisti, J. Clim., in press.
22. J. C. Ridge et al., Geogr. Phys. Quat. 53, 1 (1999).
23. T. M. Rittenour, thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (1999).
24. The Claremont gap in the NE varve chronology separated varves from the lower (NE varves 2701 through 6352) and upper (NE varves 6601 through 7750) Connecticut River valley (Glacial Lake Hitchcock). Ridge et al. (22) linked the two sequences (lower NE varve 6012 = upper NE varve 6601) to correct this gap. The Hudson Valley gap (NE varves 5600 through 5709) consisted of varves from Lake Albany that were used to span an interval not covered in Glacial Lake Hitchcock. Correlation with a core from Glacial Lake Hitchcock (23) has indicated a 10-varve error in the sequence (NE varves 5669 through 5678), which has been removed from the NE varve chronology (varve numbers were not adjusted, numbers 5669 through 5678 were just removed from the chronology).
25. J. C. Ridge and F. D. Larsen, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 102, 889 (1990).
26. K. L. Verosub, Geophys. Res. Lett. 6, 245 (1979).
27. K. Hughen, J. T. Overpeck, R. Anderson, Holocene 10, 9 (2000).
28. D. R. Hardy, B. S. Bradley, B. Zolitschka, J. Paleolimnol. 16, 227 (1996).
29. E. R. Cook, K. R. Briffa, D. M. Meko, D. A. Graybill, G. Funkhouser, Holocene 5, 229 (1995).
30. Correlation between these data sets was highly statistically significant [correlation coefficients ranged from r = 0.9 to 0.4 for 100 or more overlapping samples]. In one overlapping segment with only eight points in common, a statistically meaningful correlation was not obtained.
31. D. J. Thomson, Proc. IEEE 70, 1055 (1982).
32. J. Park, C. R. Lindberg, F. L. Vernon III, J. Geophys. Res. 92, 12675 (1987).
33. We used the multitaper method of spectral analysis (31, 32) based on p = 8 tapers and a time-frequency half-bandwidth product of W = 5N as a compromise between spectral bandwidth and the stability of the spectrum estimate. The 4022 independent annual values were zero-padded to the nearest power of 2 (N = 4096), providing 2048/5 = 410 approximately independent estimates of the amplitude of the spectrum.
34. M. E. Mann and J. Lees, Clim. Change 33, 409 (1996).
35. Significance of narrowband features in the spectrum relative to the null hypothesis of red noise was determined with the robust method of noise background estimation of Mann and Lees (34). This analysis incorporates a separate application of Thomson's (37) F-test criterion for phase coherence to determine if the underlying signal is simply a narrowband feature of the spectrum or if it is a true harmonic oscillatory signal.
36. M. E. Mann and J. Park, J. Geophys. Res. 99, 25819 (1994).
37. M. Ghil and R. Vautard, Nature 350, 324 (1991).
38. J. W. Hurrell, Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 665 (1996).
39. E. R. Cook, R. D. D'Arrigo, K. R. Briffa, Holocene 8, 9 (1998).
40. T. Baranyi, A. Ludmany, H. Coffey, Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 2269 (1998).
41. Given the time-frequency bandwidth of the analysis (31), one would expect 1% of 410, or ∼4, spurious peaks at the 99% level, arising from random statistical fluctuations alone, including only 2 in the frequency range of 0.2 to 0.4 cycles per year.
42. S. E. Zebiak and M. A. Cane, in Greenhouse-Gas-Induced Climate Change: A Critical Appraisal of Simulations and Observations, M. E. Schlesinger, Ed. (Elsevier, New York, 1991), pp. 457-469.
43. N. E. Graham and W. B. White, Science 240, 1293 (1988).
44. S. E. Zebiak and M. A. Cane, Mon. Weather Rev. 115, 2262 (1987).
45. K. E. Trenberth, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 71, 988 (1990).
46. Y. Zhang, J. M. Wallace, D. S. Battisti, J. Clim. 10, 1004 (1997).
47. The authors thank J. Ridge, Tufts University, for providing varve thickness measurements from the NE varve chronology and his own measured sections, along with providing useful information regarding the dating of the varve chronology. T.M.R. acknowledges support from the Geological Society of America, Sigma Xi, and the Department of Geosciences at the University of Massachusetts. J.B.-G. acknowledges support from National Geographic and a University of Massachusetts faculty grant. M.E.M. acknowledges support from NOAA and NSF through the Earth Systems History Program and from the U.S. Department of Energy through the Alexander Hollaender Distinguished Postdoctoral Fellowship Program.