Development and validation of the osteoporosis risk assessment instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry

CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal

Volumn 162, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 1289-1294

  Cadarette, Suzanne M ^a,b   Jaglal, Susan B ^a,c,d   Kreiger, Nancy ^a,e   McIsaac, Warren J ^f   Darlington, Gerarda A ^b   Tu, Jack V ^a,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EVALUATIVE SCIENCES   (Canada)

^d SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^e CANCER CARE ONTARIO   (Canada)

^f NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENSITOMETRY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; META ANALYSIS; MULTICENTER STUDY; OSTEOPOROSIS; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTMENOPAUSE OSTEOPOROSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0034595345     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. 1. Jaglal S. Osteoporotic fractures: incidence and impact. In: Williams JI, Badley EM, editors. Patterns of health care in Ontario: arthritis and related conditions. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 1998. p. 143-56.
2. 2. Johnell O. The socioeconomic burden of fractures: today and in the 21st century. Am J Med 1997;103(2A Suppl):20S-26S.
3. 3. Lindsay R. The burden of osteoporosis: cost. Am J Med 1995;98(2A Suppl):9S-11S.
4. 4. Singer BR, McLauchlan GJ, Robinson CM, Christie J. Epidemiology of fractures in 15 000 adults: the influence of age and gender. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80B:243-8.
5. 5. Jaglal SB, Sherry PG, Schatzker J. The impact and consequences of hip fracture in Ontario. Can J Surg 1996;39(2):105-11.
6. 6. Millar WJ, Hill GB. Hip fractures: mortality, morbidity and surgical treatment. Health Rep 1994;6(3):323-37.
7. 7. Papadimitropoulus EA, Coyte PC, Jossc RG, Greenwood CE. Current and projected rates of hip fracture in Canada. CMAJ 1997;157(10):1357-63. Available: www.cma.ca/cmaj/vol-157/issue-10/1357.htm
8. 8. National Osteoporosis Foundation. Physician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Belle Mead (NJ): Excerpta Medica; 1998.
9. 9. Kanis JA, Delmas P, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Torgerson D. Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease. Osteoporos Int 1997;7(4):390-406.
10. 10. The prevention and management of osteoporosis. Consensus statement. Australian National Consensus Conference 1996. Med J Aust 1997;167(Suppl 1):1-15.
11. 11. Scientific Advisory Board, Osteoporosis Society of Canada. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. CMAJ 1996;155(8):1113-33. Available: www.cma.ca/disease/osteo_p2/osteocpg.htm
12. 12. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The Canadian guide to clinical preventive health care. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada; 1994.
13. 13. US Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
14. 14. Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 1996;312:1254-9.
15. 15. Jaglal SB, Hawker G, Jaakkimainen L, McIsaac W. Bone density testing in Ontario, Canada: patterns of use and implications for health care costs [abstract]. J Bone Miner Res 1999;14(Suppl 1):S251.
16. 16. Kazanjian A, Green C, Bassett K. Bone densitometry: Does the emperor have clothes? [letter]. CMAJ 1999;160(13):1822. Available: www.cma.ca/cmaj/vol-160/issue-13/letters-13.htm#8
17. 17. Joseph P, Hughes D. Osteoporosis: guidelines for general practitioners. Aust Fam Physician 1997;26(10):1181-96.
18. 18. Kreiger N, Tenenhouse A, Joseph L, Mackenzie T, Poliquin S, Brown J, et al. The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos): background, rationale, methods. Can J Aging 1999;18(3):376-87.
19. 19. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-98.
20. 20. Wasson JH, Sox HC, Neff RK, Goldman L. Clinical prediction rules. Application and methodological standards. N Engl J Med 1985;313(13):793-9.
21. 21. Genant HK, Grampp S, Glüer CC, Faulkner KG, Jergas M, Engelke K, et al. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9(10):1503-14.
22. 22. Jergas M, Glüer C. Assessment of fracture risk by bone density measurements. Semin Nucl Med 1997;27(3):261-75.
23. 23. Meema HE, Meema S. Postmenopausal osteoporosis: simple screening method for diagnosis before structural failure. Radiology 1987;164:405-10.
24. 24. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE, Nizam A. Selecting the best regression equation. In: Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. 3rd ed. Toronto: Duxbury Press; 1998. p. 386-422.
25. 25. Laupacis A, Sekar N, Stiell IG. Clinical prediction rules: a review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA 1997;277(6):488-94.
26. 26. Tu JV, Mazer D, Levinton C, Armstrong PW, Naylor CD. A predictive index for length of stay in the intensive care unit following cardiac surgery. CMAJ 1994;151(2):177-85.
27. 27. Harrell F. Regression coefficients and scoring rules [letter]. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49(7):819.
28. 28. Tu JV, Naylor CD. Clinical prediction rules [letter]. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50(6):743-4.
29. 29. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978;8(4):283-98.
30. 30. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29-36.
31. 31. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837-45.
32. 32. Green CJ, Basette K, Foerster V, Kazanjian A. Bone mineral density testing: Does the evidence support its selective use in well women? Vancouver: British Columbia Office of Health Technology Assessment, University of British Columbia; 1997. Report no BCOHTA 97:2T.
33. 33. Michaëlsson K, Bergström R, Mallmin H, Holmberg L, Wolk A, Ljunghall S. Screening for osteopenia and osteoporosis: selection by body composition. Osteoporos Int 1996;6:120-6.
34. 34. Lydick E, Cook K, Turpin J, Melton M, Stine R, Byrnes C. Development and validation of a simple questionnaire to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density. Am J Manag Care 1998;4(1):37-48.
35. 35. Weinstein L, Ullery B, Bourguignon C. A simple system to determine who needs osteoporosis screening. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93(5 pt 1):757-60.
36. 36. Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Murray TM. Validation of the Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation (SCORE) for patient selection for bone densitometry. Osteoporos Int 1999;10(1):85-90.
37. 37. Papaioannou A, Parkinson W, Adachi J, O'Connor A, Jolly EE, Tugwell P, et al. Women's decisions about hormone replacement therapy after education and bone densitometry. CMAJ 1998;159(10):1253-7. Abstract available: www.cma.ca/cmaj/vol-159/issue-10/1253.htm
38. 38. Torgerson DJ, Thomas RE, Campbell MK, Reid DM. Randomized trial of osteoporosis screening. Use of hormone replacement therapy and quality-of-life results. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:2121-5.
39. 39. Jönsson B. Targeting high-risk populations. Osteoporos Int 1998;8(Suppl 1):S13-6.
40. 40. Changes to the physicians' schedule of benefits and technical fee adjustments for October 1, 1999 [Bull no 4346]. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 1999.