Testing for the RN- gene in retail pork chops

Meat Science

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 231-237

  Meadus, W J ^a   MacInnis, R ^a  

^a LACOMBE RESEARCH CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SUS SCROFA;

EID: 0034582212     PISSN: 03091740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00084-4     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Armstrong A. Multi-functional potato products. Meat International. 7(4):1998;27-29.
2. Atkinson, T., Fowler, V. R., Garton, G. A., & Lough, A. K. (1972). A rapid method for the accurate determination of lipid in animal tissues. Analyst, 156, 562-568.
3. Ball, R. O., Gibson, J. P., Aker, C. A., Nadarajah, K., Uttaro, B. E., & Fortin, A. (1996). Differences among breeds, breed origins and gender for growth, carcass composition and pork quality (http://ja.asci.ncsu.edu/nsif/96proc/opcap2.html accessed 14/7/97).
4. Cheah K.S., Cheah A.M., Just A. Identification and characterization of pigs prone to producing 'RSE' (Reddish-pink, soft and exudative) meat in normal pigs. Meat Science. 48(3/4):1998;249-255.
5. Dalrymple R.H., Hamm R. A method for the extraction of glycogen and metabolites from a single muscle sample. Journal of Food Technology. 8:1973;439-444.
6. - allele in Swedish Hampshire pigs and comparison of glycolytic potential, carcass composition, and technological meat quality among Swedish Hampshire, Landrace, and Yorkshire pigs. Jounal of Animal Science. 75:1997;2924-2935.
7. - allele for carcass composition, muscle distribution and technological meat quality in Hampshire-sired pigs. Livestock Production Science. 47:1997;221-229.
8. Fernandez X., Naveau J., Talmant A., Monin G. Distribution du potentiel glycolytique dans une population porcine et relation avec le rendement "Napole" Journal de la Recherche Porcien. 22:1990;97-100.
9. Fujii J., Otsu K., Zorzato F., De Leon S., Khanna V.K., Weiler J.E., O'Brien P.J., Maclennan D.H. Identification of a mutation in the porcine ryanodine receptor associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science. 253:1991;448-451.
10. - gene on cooking yield of pork in a model system in presence of phosphate. Proceedings 45th International congress of meat science technology, Auckland, New Zealand, abstract D1-17.
11. Keppler, D., & Decker, K. (1974). Glycogen determination with amyloglucosidase. In: H.U. Bermeyer, Methods of enzymatic analysis. New York Academic Press Inc.
12. Lahucky R., Palanska O., Mojto J., Zaujec K., Huba J. Effect of preslaughter handling on muscle glycogen level and selected meat quality traits in beef. Meat Science. 50(3):1998;389-393.
13. Mariani P., Lundstrom K., Gustafsson U., Enfalt A.-C., Juneja R.K., Andersson L. A major locus (RN) affecting muscle glycogen content is located on pig chromosome 15. Mammalian Genome. 7:1996;52-54.
14. Maribo H., Stoier S., Jorgensen P.F. Procedure for the determination of glycolytic otential in porcine m. longissimus dorsi. Meat Science. 51:1999;191-193.
15. Meadus W.J. Molecular techniques used in the search for genetic determinants to improve meat quality. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 78(4):1998;483-492.
16. Milan D., Woloszyn N., Yerle M., LeRoy P., Bonnet M., Riquet J., Lahbib-Mansais Y., Caritez J.-C., Robic A., Sellier P., Elsen J.-M., Gellin J. Accurate mapping of the acid meat RN gene on genetic and physical maps of pig chromosome 15. Mammalian Genome. 7:1996;47-51.
17. Miller, D., Ellis, M., McKeith, F., & Wilson, E. (1998). Relationship between glycolytic potential and growth performance, carcass and meat quality characteristics within a swine population with low glycolytic potential (http://www.aces.unic.edu/~pork/research/98 report accessed 5/10/98).
18. Moller M.J., Chaudhary R., Hellman E., Hoyheim B., Chowdhary B., Andersson L. Pigs with the dominant white coat colour phenotype carry a duplication of the KIT gene encoding the mast/stem cell growth factor receptor. Mammalian Genome. 7:1996;822-830.
19. Monin G., Sellier P. Pork of low technological quality with a normal rate of muscle pH fall in the immediate post-mortem period: the case of the Hampshire breed. Meat Science. 13:1985;49-63.
20. Murray, A. C. (1995). The evaluation of meat quality. In: S. D. Morgan Jones, Quality and grading of carcasses of meat animals. FL: CRC Press Inc.
21. Murray A.C., Johnson C.P. Impact of the halothane gene on muscle quality and pre-slaughter deaths in Western Canadian pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 78:1998;543-548.
22. Rohrer G.A., Alexander L.J., Keele J.W., Smith T.P., Beattie C.W. A microsatellite linkage map of the porcine genome. Genetics. 136:1994;231-245.
23. SAS (1995). SAS user's guide: statistics (5th ed.) Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
24. Sayer R.N., Briskey E.J., Hoekstra W.G. Comparison of muscle characteristics and postmortem glycolysis in three breeds of swine. Journal of Animal Science. 22:1963;1012-1020.
25. Talmant, A., Fernandez, X., Sellier, P., & Monin, G. (1989). Glycolytic potential in longissimus dorsi muscle of large-white pigs, as measured after in vivo sampling (pp. 1129-1132). Proceedings 35th international. congr. meat sci. technol., Copenhagen, Denmark.
26. Warner R.D., Kauffman R.G., Greaser M.L. Muscle protein changes post mortem in relation to pork quality traits. Meat Science. 45(3):1997;339-352.