Whoever said that markets were fair?

Negotiation Journal

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 237-252

  Blount, Sally ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034561438     PISSN: 07484526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2000.tb00216.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adams, J. S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 2, edited by L. Berkowitz. New York: Academic Press.
2. Albin, C. 1993. The role of fairness in negotiation. Negotiation Journal 9(3): 223-244.
3. Allison, S. T. and D. M. Messick 1990. Social decision heuristics and the use of shared resources. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 3: 195-204.
4. Babcock, L., X. H. Wang, and G.F. Loewenstein 1996. Choosing the wrong pond: Social comparisons in negotiation that reflect a self-serving bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111: 1-19.
5. Bazerman, M. H. 1985. Norms of distributive justice interest arbitration. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38: 558-570.
6. Bazerman, M. H. and M. A. Neale 1995. The role of fairness considerations and relationships in a judgmental perspective of negotiation. In Barriers to conflict resolution, edited by K. Arrow, R.H. Mnookin, L. Ross, A. Tversky and R. Wilson. New York: W. W. Norton.
7. Bies, R. J. and J. S. Moag 1986. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Research on negotiations in organizations, vol. 1, edited by R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard and M. H. Bazerman. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
8. Bies, R. J., T. M. Tripp, and M. A. Neale 1993. Procedural fairness and profit seeking: The perceived legitimacy of market exploitation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 64: 243-256.
9. Blount, S. 1999. The "fair market" illusion. Working paper, Center for Decision Research, University of Chicago.
10. Blount, S., M. H. Bazerman and M. A. Neale 1995. Alternative models of negotiated outcomes and the nontraditional utility concerns that limit their predictability. In Research on negotiation in organizations, vol. 5, edited by R. J. Bies, R. J. Lewicki and B. H. Sheppard. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
11. Blount, S., M. Thomas-Hunt, and M. A. Neale 1996. The price is right - or is it? A reference point model of dyadic price negotiations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 68: 1-12.
12. Blount White, S. and M. A. Neale 1991. Reservation prices, resistance points, and BATNAs: Determining the parameters of acceptable negotiated outcomes. Negotiation Journal 7(4): 379-388.
13. _. and _. 1994. The role of negotiator aspirations and settlement expectancies on bargaining outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 57: 303-317.
14. Blount White, S., K. Valley, M. H. Bazerman, M. A. Neale, and S. Peck 1994. Alternative models of price behavior in dyadic negotiations: Market prices, reservation prices, and negotiator aspirations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 57: 430-447.
15. Carnevale, P. J. and D. S. Pruitt 1992. Negotiation and mediation. Annual Review of Psychology 43: 531-582.
16. Deutsch, M. 1975. Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice. Journal of Social Issues 31: 137-149.
17. Festinger, L. 1954. A theory of social comparison process. Human Relations 7: 117-140.
18. Goldstein, W. M. and R. M. Hogarth, eds. 1997. Research on judgment and decision making: Currents, connections and controversies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Heuer, L., E. Blumenthal, A. Douglas and T. Weinblatt 1999. A deservingness approach to respect as a relationally based fairness judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25: 1279-1292.
20. Kahneman, D., J. L. Knetsch and R. H. Thaler 1986. Fairness as a constraint on profit-seeking: Entitlements in the market. American Economic Review 76: 714-728.
21. Lerner, M. J. and D. T. Miller 1978. Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin 85: 1030-1051.
22. Leventhal, G. S. 1980. What should be done with equity theory? In Social exchange: Advances in theory and research, edited by K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg and R. H. Willis. New York: Plenum Press.
23. Lind, E. A. and T. R. Tyler 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
24. Mellers, B. A. and J. Baron 1993. Psychological perspectives on justice: Theory and application. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Messick, D.M. 1993. Equality as a decision heuristic. In Psychological perspectivse on justice: Theory and application, edited by B. A. Mellers and J. Baron. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Nash, J. F. 1950. The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18: 155-162.
27. Neale, M. A. and M. H. Bazerman 1991. Cognition and rationality in negotiation. New York: Free Press.
28. Raiffa, H. 1982. The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
29. Suls, J. and R. I. Miller 1997. Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Washington: Hemisphere.
30. Taylor, S.E. and J. D. Brown 1988. Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin 103: 193-210.
31. Thibaut, J. W. and L. Walker 1975. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
32. Thompson, L. and G. F. Loewenstein 1992. Egocentric interpretations of fairness in interpersonal conflict. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes 51: 176-197.
33. Walton, R.E. and R. B. McKersie 1965. A behavioral theory of labor negotiations. New York: McGraw-Hill.