Teaching gerontology via distance education: Variety is the key to success

Educational Gerontology

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 665-675

  Piercy, Kathleen W ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034550023     PISSN: 03601277     EISSN: 15210472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03601270050200653     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Blumenstyk, G., & McCollum, K. (1999, April 16). Two reports question utility and accessibility in distance education. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 45, 31.
2. Boling, N. C., & Robinson, D. H. (1999). Individual study, interactive multimedia, or cooperative learning: Which activity best supplements lecture-based distance education? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 169-174.
3. Bolton, C. R. (1988). Program standards and faculty development instruction: A role for professional organizations. Educational Gerontology, 14, 497-507.
4. Braun, K. L., Roberts, E., Dubanoski, J. P., Lenzer, A. M., & Goodman, R. J. (1998). Evaluating a telecourse on aging. Educational Gerontology, 24, 141-157.
5. Guerrero, L. K., & Miller, T. A. (1998). Associations between nonverbal behaviors and initial impressions of instructor competence and course content in videotaped distance education courses. Communication Education, 47, 30-42.
6. Hillesheim, G. (1998). Distance learning: Barriers and strategies for students and faculty. The Internet and Higher Education, 1, 31-44.
7. Malone, D. M., Schmidt, M. S., & Poon, L. W. (1998). The distance learning partnership in gerontology: The Georgia model for gerontology higher education. Educational Gerontology, 24, 247-284.
8. Rangecroft, M. (1998). Interpersonal communication in distance education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 24(1), 75.
9. Rubiales, D., Steely, M. T., Wollner, C. E., Richardson, J. T., & Smith, M. F. (1998). Distance learning. Academe, 84(3), 30-38.
10. Rutz, E., & Hajek, B. (1998). Collaborative distance learning using interactive video: Lessons learned from the University of Cincinnati/Ohio State University experience. In Distance Learning '98: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, 315-319.
11. Schauer, J., Rockwell, S. K., Fritz, S., & Marx, D. (1998). Education, assistance and support needed for distance delivery: Faculty and administrators' perceptions. In Distance Learning '98: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, 321-328.
12. Schlenker, J. A. (1994). The Socratic camera: Increasing interaction with distant learners. Community College Journal, 65, 20-23.
13. Schneider, E. L., Glass, S., Henke, M., & Overton, J. (1997). Distance learning in gerontology: The future is here. Generations, 21(3), 46-49.
14. Stoller, E. P., & Gibson, R. C. (1997). Worlds of difference: Inequality in the aging experience (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
15. Teaster, P. B., & Blieszner, R. (1999). Promises and pitfalls of the interactive television approach. Educational Gerontology, 25, 741-753.
16. USU Distance Education. (1999). USU distance education: A brief history. Logan, UT: Author. [On-line]. Available: http://www.ext.usu.edu/distance/distance/dehist.html
17. Wagner, D. R., Martin, A., Schuster, J. H., Conklin, C. L., Gorman, R. A., Rubiales, D., Kreiser, B. R., & Smith, M. F. (1999). Distance education and intellectual property. Academe, 85(3), 41-45.
18. Willis, B. (1998). Effective distance education planning: Lessons learned. Educational Technology, 38, 57-59.
19. Wolfe, T. E. (1998). Putting interaction into interactive television. In Distance Learning '98: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, 467-472.
20. Wood, J. B., & Parham, I. A. (1996). Distance learning: Videoconferences as vehicles for faculty development in gerontology/geriatrics. Educational Gerontology, 22, 105-115.