Strongest evidence in compatibility: Clique and tree evaluation using apparent phylogenetic signal

Taxon

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 755-766

  Salisbury, Benjamin A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHLORIS; POACEAE;

EID: 0032736259     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1223646     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Day, W. H. E., Estabrook, G. F. & McMorris, F. R. 1998. Measuring the phylogenetic randomness of biological data sets. Syst. Biol. 47: 604-616.
2. Estabrook, G. F. 1997. Ancestor-descendant relations and incompatible data: motivation for research in discrete mathematics. Pp. 1-28 in: Mirkin, B., McMorris, F. R., Roberts, F. S. & Rzhetsky, A. (ed.), Mathematical hierarchies and biology. Providence.
3. -, Johnson, C. S. & McMorris, F. R. 1975. An idealized concept of the true cladistic character. Math. Biosci. 23: 263-272.
4. -, Strauch, J. G. & Fiala, K. L. 1977. An application of compatibility analysis to the Blackiths' data on orthopteroid insects. Syst. Zool. 26: 269-276.
5. Faith, D. P. 1991. Cladistic permutation tests for monophyly and nonmonophyly. Syst. Zool. 40: 366-375.
6. Farris, J. S. 1988. Hennig86, version 1.5. New York.
7. Felsenstein, J. 1983. Numerical taxonomy. Berlin.
8. -1993. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package), version 3.5p. Seattle.
9. Jakobsen, I. B. & Easteal, S. 1996. A program for calculating and displaying compatibility matrices as an aid in determining reticulate evolution in molecular sequences. Computer Appl.ic. Biosci. 12: 291-295.
10. Le Quesne, W. J. 1969. A method of selection of characters in numerical taxonomy. Syst. Zool. 18: 201-205.
11. -1972. Further studies based on the uniquely derived character concept. Syst. Zool. 21: 281-288.
12. Maddison, W. P. & Slatkin, M. 1991. Null models for the number of evolutionary steps in a character on a phylogenetic tree. Evolution 45: 1184-1197.
13. Meacham, C. A. 1981. A probability measure for character compatibility. Math. Biosci. 57: 1-18.
14. -1994. Phylogenetic relationships at the basal radiation of angiosperms: further study by probability of character compatibility. Syst. Bot. 19: 506-522.
15. -& Estabrook, G. F. 1985. Compatibility methods in systematics. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:431-46.
16. Salisbury, B. S. 1999. Strongest evidence: maximum apparent phylogenetic signal as a new cladistic optimality criterion. Cladistics 48: 137-149.
17. Sneath, P. H. A., Sackin, M. J. & Ambler, R. P. 1975. Detecting evolutionary incompatibilities from protein sequences. Syst. Zool. 24: 311-332.
18. Varadarajan, G. S. & Gilmartin, A. J. 1983. Phenetic and cladistic analyses of North American Chloris (Poaceae). Taxon 32: 380-386.
19. Wilkinson, M. 1998. Split support and split conflict randomization tests in phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol. 47: 673-695.