Perception, representation and recognition: A holistic view of recognition

Spatial Vision

Volumn 13, Issue 2-3, 2000, Pages 265-275

  Christou, Chris ^a   Bülthoff, Heinrich H ^b  

^a UNILEVER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

RETINAL IMAGE; VISUAL SYSTEMS;

VISION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; RETINA; REVIEW;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RETINA;

EID: 0034352148     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156856800741081     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Biederman, I. (1981). Do background depth gradients facilitate object identification? Perception 10, 573-579.
2. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding, Psychol. Rev. 94, 115-147.
3. Biederman, I. and Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance, J. Exper. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 19, 1162-1182.
4. Bülthoff, H. H. and Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 60-64.
5. Bülthoff, H. H. and Mallot, H. A. (1988). Integration of depth modules: stereo and shading, J. Optical Soc. Amer. A 5, 1749-1758.
6. Christou, C. G., Koenderink, J. J. and van Doom, A. (1996). Surface gradients, contours and the perception of surface attitude in images of complex scenes, Perception 25, 701-713.
7. Christou, C. and Bülthoff, H. H. (1999). View dependence in scene recognition after active learning, Memory and Cognition 27, 996-1007.
8. Christou, C., Tjan, B. S. and Bülthoff, H. H. (1999). Viewpoint information provided by a familiar environment facilitates object identification, Max-Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Technical Report No. 68.
9. Edelman, S. and Bülthoff, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects, Vision Research 32, 2385-2400.
10. Humphrey, G. K. and Jolicoeur, P. (1993). An examination of the effects of axis foreshortening, monocular depth cues and visual field on object identification, Quart. J. Exper. Psychol. 46A (1), 137-159.
11. Johnston, E. B. (1991). Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis, Vision Research 31, 1351-1360.
12. Johnston, E. B., Cumming, B. G. and Parker, A. J. (1993). The integration of depth modules: stereopsis and texture, Vision Research 33, 813-826.
13. Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J. and Kappers, A. M. L. (1992). Surface perception in pictures, Perception and Psychophysics 52 (5), 487-496.
14. Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., Christou, C. and Lappin, J. S. (1996). Perturbation study of shading in pictures, Perception 25 (9), 1009-1026.
15. Liter, J. C. and Bülthoff, H. H. (1998). An introduction to object recognition, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 53c, 610-621.
16. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B. and Young, M. (1994). Measurement and modelling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak of weak fusion, Vision Research 35 (3), 389-412.
17. Marr, D. and Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes, Phil Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 200, 269-294.
18. Palmer, S. E., Rosch, E. and Chase, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects, in: Attention and Performance IX, Long, J. and Baddeley, A. (Eds), pp. 135-151. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
19. Pinker, S. (1984). Visual cognition: An introduction, in: Visual Cognition, Pinker, S. (Ed.), pp. 1-62. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
20. Rock, I. and DiVita, J. (1987). A case of viewer-centred perception, Cognitive Psychology 19, 280-293.
21. Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects, Psychonomics Bulletin and Review 2 (1), 55-82.
22. Tarr, M. J. and Bülthoff, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). J. Exper: Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 21 (6), 1494-1505.
23. Wallach, H. and O'Connell, D. N. (1953). The kinetic depth effect, J. Exper. Psychol. 45, 205-217.
24. Wallis, G. and Bülthoff, H. H. (1999). Learning to recognize objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3, 22-31.
25. Wheatstone, C. (1838). On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. 33, 371-394.
26. Young, M. J., Landy, M. S. and Maloney, L. T. (1993). A perturbation analysis of depth-perception from combinations of texture and motion cue, Vision Research 33 (18), 2685-2696.