An introduction to object recognition

Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung - Section C Journal of Biosciences

Volumn 53, Issue 7-8, 1998, Pages 610-621

  Liter, Jeffrey C ^a   Bülthoff, Heinrich H ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Categorization; Form Perception; Object Recognition; Psychophysics; Shape Representation

Indexed keywords

PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032124515     PISSN: 09395075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/znc-1998-7-814     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Bartram D. J. (1974), The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming. Cognit. Psych. 6, 325-356.
2. Biederman I. (1987), Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psycholog. Rev. 94, 115-147.
3. Biederman I. and Cooper E. E. (1991), Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognit. Psych. 23, 393-419.
4. Biederman I. and Cooper E. E. (1992), Size invariance in visual object priming. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 18, 121-133.
5. Biederman I. and Gerhardstein P. C. (1993), Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 19, 1162-1182.
6. Blanz V., Vetter T., Bülthoff H. H. and Tarr M. J. (1995), What object attributes determine canonical views? Perception 24 (Supplement), 119c.
7. Bruce V. (1988), Recognising Faces. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
8. Bülthoff H. H. and Edelman S. (1992), Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 60-64.
9. Cave C. B. and Kosslyn S. M. (1993), The role of parts and spatial relations in object identification. Perception 22, 229-248.
10. Edelman S. and Bülthoff H. H. (1992), Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vis. Res. 32, 2385-2400.
11. Farah M. J. (1990), Visual Agnosia: Disorders of Object Recognition and What They Tell Us about Normal Vision. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. Farah M. J., Rochlin R. and Klein K. L. (1994), Orientation invariance and geometric primitives in shape recognition. Cognit. Sci. 18, 325-344.
13. Hayward W. G. (1998), Effects of outline shape in object recognition. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance, in press.
14. Hoffman D. D. and Richards W. A. (1984), Parts of recognition. Cognition 18, 65-96.
15. Hummel J. E. and Biederman I. (1992), Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psycholog. Rev. 99, 480-517.
16. Humphrey G. K. and Khan S. C. (1992), Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects. Canad. J. Psychol. 46, 170-190.
17. Jolicoeur P., Gluck M. A. and Kosslyn S. M. (1984), From pictures to words: Making the connection. Cognit. Psychol. 16, 243-275.
18. Kurbat M. A. (1994), Structural description theories: Is RBC/JIM a general-purpose theory of human entry-level object recognition? Perception 23, 1339-1368.
19. Liter J. C. and Bülthoff H. H. (1996), The contribution of distinct component configurations to object recognition across changes of view. Invest. Ophthalm. Vis. Sci. 37 (Supplement), 177.
20. Logothetis N. K., Pauls J., Bülthoff H. H. and Poggio T. (1994), View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Curr. Biol. 4, 401-414.
21. Marr D. (1982), Vision. Freeman, San Francisco.
22. Marr D. and Nishihara H. K. (1978), Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three dimensional shapes. Proc.R. Soc. London B 200, 269-294.
23. Palmer S. E., Rosch E. and Chase P. (1981), Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In: Attention and Performance IX (J. Long, A. Baddeley, eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 135-151.
24. Rock I. and DiVita J. (1987), A case of viewer-centered object perception. Cognit. Psychol. 19, 280-293.
25. Rock I., DiVita J. and Barbeito R. (1981), The effect on form perception of change of orientation in the third dimension. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 7, 719-732.
26. Roediger H. L., Weldon M. S. and Challis B. H. (1989), Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In: Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in Honour or Endel Tulving (H. L. Roediger, F. I. M. Craik, eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 3-41.
27. Rosch E., Mervis C. B., Gray W., Johnson D. and Boyes-Braem, P. (1976), Basic objects in natural categories. Cognit. Psychol. 8, 382-439.
28. Schacter D. L. (1987), Implicit memory: History and current status. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 13, 501-518.
29. Schacter D. L. (1990), Perceptual representation systems and implicit memory: Toward a resolution of the multiple memory systems debate. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 608, 543-571.
30. Schacter D. L., Cooper L. A., Delaney S. M., Peterson M. A. and Tharan M. (1991), Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: Constraints on the construction of structural descriptions. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 17, 3-19.
31. Shepard R. N. and Cooper L. A. (1982), Mental Images and Their Transformations. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. Sklar E., Bülthoff H. H., Edelman S. and Basri R. (1993), Generalization of object recognition across stimulus rotation and deformation. Invest. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. 34 (Supplement), 1081.
33. Snodgrass J. G. and Vanderwart M. (1980), A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Learning and Memory 6, 174-215.
34. Srinivas K. (1995), Representation of rotated objects in explicit and implicit memory. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21, 1019-1036.
35. Tarr M. J. (1995), Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psych. Bull. Rev. 2, 55-82.
36. Tversky B. and Hemenway K. (1984), Objects, parts, and categories. J. Exp. Psychol.: General 113, 169-193.
37. Ullman S. and Basri R. (1991), Recognition by linear combinations of models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 13, 992-1005.
38. Williams P. and Tarr M. J. (1997), Structural processing and Implicit memory for possible and impossible figures. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23(6), 1344-1361.