Escalation research: Providing new frontiers for applying behavior analysis to organizational behavior

Behavior Analyst

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 203-218

  Goltz, Sonia M ^a  

^a MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Applied behavior analysis; Decision making; Escalation; Organizational behavior; Persistence; Reinforcement; Variability

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034346379     PISSN: 07386729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03392011     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Amsel, A. (1967). Partial reinforcement effects on vigor and persistence: Advances in frustration theory derived from a variety of within-subjects experiments. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1, pp. 1-65). New York: Academic Press.
2. Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124-140.
3. Armstrong, J. S., Coviello, N., & Safranek, B. (1993). Escalation bias: Does it extend to marketing? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 21, 247-253.
4. Bazerman, M., Giuliano, T., & Appelman, A. (1984). Escalation of commitment in individual and group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 141-152.
5. Bragger, J. D., Bragger, D., Hantula, D. A., & Kirnan, J. (1998). Hysteresis and uncertainty: The effect of uncertainty on delays to exit decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 229-253.
6. Brockner, J. (1992). The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review, 17, 39-61.
7. Capaldi, E. J. (1966). Partial reinforcement: A hypothesis of sequential effects. Psychological Review, 73, 459-477.
8. Capaldi, E. J. (1967). A sequential hypothesis of instrumental learning. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1, pp. 67-156). New York: Academic Press.
9. Capaldi, E. J. (1992). The organization of behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 575-577.
10. Case, D. A., Ploog, B. O., & Fantino, E. (1990). Observing behavior in a computer game. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 185-199.
11. Conlon, E. J., & Parks, J. M. (1987). Information requests in the context of escalation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 344-350.
12. Davis, M. A., & Bobko, P. (1986). Contextual effects on escalation processes in public sector decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 121-138.
13. DiFonzo, N., & Hantula, D. A. (1995). Why some people escalate investments in failing courses of action: Bayesian updating. Paper presented at the convention of the American Psychological Society, New York.
14. Drummond, H. (1996). Escalation in decision-making: The tragedy of Taurus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Eubanks, J. L., & Lloyd, K. E. (1992). Relating behavior analysis to the organizational culture concept and perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 12, 27-44.
16. Fantino, E. (1967). Preference for mixed-versus fixed-ratios. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 35-43.
17. Fantino, E. (1998). Judgment and decision making: Behavioral approaches. The Behavior Analyst, 21, 203-218.
18. Fantino, E., & Case, D. A. (1983). Human observing: Maintained by stimuli correlated with reinforcement but not extinction. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 40, 193-210.
19. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dis-sonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20. Fox, W. M. (1987). Effective group problem solving. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Frederiksen, L. W. (1982). Organizational behavior management: An overview. In L. W. Frederiksen (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior management (pp. 3-20). New York: Wiley.
22. Garland, H., Sandefur, C. A., & Rogers, A. C. (1990). De-escalation of commitment in oil exploration: When sunk costs and negative feedback coincide. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 921-927.
23. Goltz, S. M. (1992). A sequential learning analysis of continued investments of organizational resources in nonperforming courses of action. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 561-574.
24. Goltz, S. M. (1993). Examining the joint roles of responsibility and reinforcement history in recommitment. Decision Sciences, 24, 977-994.
25. Goltz, S. M. (1999). Can't stop on a dime: The roles of matching and momentum in persistence of commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 19, 37-63.
26. Goltz, S. M., & Northey, J. E. (1998). Simulating the variability of actual outcomes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 30, 680-689.
27. Goodall, K. (1972, November). Shapers at work. Psychology Today, 53-132.
28. Goodie, A. S., & Fantino, E. (1995). An experientially derived base-rate error in humans. Psychological Science, 6, 101-106.
29. Guzzo, R. A., & Salas, E. (1995). Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Hantula, D. A. (1992). The basic importance of escalation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 579-583.
31. Hantula, D. A. (1995). Disciplined decision making in an interdisciplinary environment: Some implications for clinical applications of statistical process control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 371-377.
32. Hantula, D. A., & Bragger, J. L. D. (1999). The effects of feedback equivocality on escalation of commitment: An empirical investigation of decision dilemma theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 424-444.
33. Hantula, D. A., & Crowell, C. R. (1994a). Behavioral contrast in a two-option analogue task of financial decision making. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 607-617.
34. Hantula, D. A., & Crowell, C. R. (1994b). Intermittent reinforcement and escalation processes in sequential decision making: A replication and theoretical analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 14, 7-36.
35. Hantula, D. A., DeNicolis, J. L., & Goltz, S. M. (1995, April). What is escalation and persistence of commitment? A critical examination of the construct. Paper presented at the 1995 meetings of the Eastern Academy of Management, Buffalo, NY.
36. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
37. Harrison, P. D., & Harrell, A. (1993). Impact of "adverse selection" on managers' project evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 635-643.
38. Herrnstein, R. J. (1964). Aperiodicity as a factor in choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 179-182.
39. Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243-266.
40. Herrnstein, R. J. (1990). Rational choice theory: Necessary but not sufficient. American Psychologist, 45, 356-367.
41. Hirshleifer, J., & Glazer, A. (1992). Price theory and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
42. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choice, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
43. Komaki, J. L. (1986). Applied behavior analysis and organizational behavior: Reciprocal influence of the two fields. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 8, pp. 297-334). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
44. Madden, G. J., Chase, P. N., & Joyce, J. H. (1998). Making sense of sensitivity in the human operant literature. The Behavior Analyst, 21, 1-12.
45. Mawhinney, T. C. (1986). OBM, SPC, and Theory D: A brief introduction. Journal of Orgnaizational Behavior Management, 8, 89-105.
46. Mawhinney, T. C. (1992). Evolution of organizational cultures as selection by consequences: The Gaia hypothesis, metacontingencies, and organizational ecology. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 12(2), 1-26.
47. Mawhinney, T. C. (1995, May). Little momentary effects that produce cumulatively large economic consequences in industrial settings: Costing metacontingencies of chronic absenteeism. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Washington, DC.
48. McCain, B. E. (1986). Continuing investment under conditions of failure: A laboratory study on the limits to escalation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 280-284.
49. Mellon, R. C., & Shull, R. L. (1986). Resistance to change produced by access to fixed-delay vs. variable-delay terminal links. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 79-92.
50. Neuringer, A., & Voss, C. (1993). Approximating chaotic behavior. Psychological Science, 4, 113-119.
51. Nevin, J. A. (1988). Behavioral momentum and the partial reinforcement extinction effect. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 44-56.
52. Nevin, J. A., & Grace, R.C. (1996). A relation between preference and resistance to change. Paper presented at the conference of the Society for the Quantitative Analysis of Behavior, San Francisco.
53. Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1986). Opportunity costs and framing of resource allocation decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 348-356.
54. O'Flaherty, B., & Komaki, J. L. (1992). Going beyond with Bayesian updating. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 585-597.
55. Platt, J. R. (1973). Social traps. American Psychologist, 28, 641-651.
56. Rachlin, H. (1989). Decision and choice reconciled. In R. C. Atkinson, G. Lindzey, & R. F. Thompson (Eds.), Judgment, decision, and choice: A cognitive/behavioral synthesis (pp. 247-282). New York: Freeman.
57. Rachlin, H. (1990). Why do people gamble and keep gambling despite heavy losses? Psychological Science, 7(5), 294-297.
58. Rachlin, H., Logue, A. W., Gibbon, J., & Frankel, M. (1986). Cognition and behavior in studies of choice. Psychological Review, 93, 33-45.
59. Rider, D. P. (1983). Preference for mixed versus constant delays of reinforcement: Effect of probability of the short, mixed delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39, 257-266.
60. Ross, J., & Staw, B. M. (1993). Organizational escalation and exit: Lessons from the Shoreham nuclear power plant. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 701-732.
61. Schoorman, F. D. (1988). The escalation bias in performance appraisals: An unintended consequence of supervisor participation in hiring decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 58-62.
62. Seibert, S., & Goltz, S. M. (in press). A comparison of allocations of individuals and interacting groups in an escalation situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
63. Shapira, Z. (1997). Organizational decision making. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64. Skinner, B. F. (1966). Operant behavior. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 12-32). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
65. Smithson, M. (1997). Judgment under chaos. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 59-66.
66. Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 27-44.
67. Staw, B. M. (1997). The escalation of commitment: An update and appraisal. In Z. Shapira (Ed.), Organizational decision making (pp. 191-215). New York: Cambridge University Press.
68. Staw, B. M., Barsade, S. G., & Koput, K. W. (1995). Escalation at the credit window: A longitudinal study of bank executives' recognition and write-off of problem loans. Working paper, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley.
69. Staw, B. M., & Fox, F. V. (1977). Escalation: The determinants of commitment to a course of action. Human Relations, 30, 431-450.
70. Staw, B. M., & Hoang, H. (1995). Sunk costs in the NBA: Why draft order affects playing time and survival in professional basketball. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 40, 474-494.
71. Staw, B. M., & Ross, J. (1978). Commitment to a policy decision: A multi-theoretical perspective. Administrative Sciences Quarterly 23, 40-64.
72. Staw, B. M., & Ross, J. (1987). Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 39-78). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
73. Staw, B. M., & Ross, J. (1989). Understanding behavior in escalation situations. Science, 246, 216-220.
74. Stolarz-Fantino, S., & Fantino, E. (1990). Cognition and behavior analysis: A review of Rachlin's Judgment, Decision, and Choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 317-322.
75. Stolarz-Fantino, S., & Fantino, E. (1995). The experimental analysis of reasoning: A review of Gilovich's How We Know What Isn't So. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 111-116.
76. Takahashi, M., & Iwamoto, T. (1986). Human concurrent performances: The effects of experience, instructions, and schedule-correlated stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 257-267.
77. Teger, A. L. (1980). Too much invested to quit. New York: Pergamon Press.
78. Wechsler, D. (1989, April 17). Letting the losses run. Forbes, p. 116.
79. Weiss, H. M. (1990). Learning theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 171-221). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.
80. Whyte, G. (1991). Diffusion of responsibility: Effects on the escalation tendency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 408-415.
81. Whyte, G., Saks, A. M., & Hook, S. (1997). When success breeds failure: The role of self-efficacy in escalating commitment to a losing course of action. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 415-432.
82. Young, J. S. (1981). Discrete-trial choice in pigeons: Effects of reinforcer magnitude. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 35, 23-29.
83. Zhou, X. (1997). Organizational decision making as rule following. In Z. Shapira (Ed.), Organizational decision making (pp. 257-281). New York: Cambridge University Press.