Judgment and decision making: Behavioral approaches

Behavior Analyst

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 203-218

  Fantino, Edmund ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Base rate neglect; Conjunction fallacy; Decision making; Matching to sample; Observing; Probability learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032339104     PISSN: 07386729     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03391964     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
2. Bloomfield, T. M. (1972). Reinforcement schedules: Contingency or contiguity? In R. M. Gilbert & J. R. Millenson (Eds.), Reinforcement: Behavioral analyses (pp. 165-208). New York: Academic Press.
3. Case, D. A., Fantino, E., & Wixted, J. (1985). Human observing: Maintained by negative informative stimuli only if correlated with improvement in response efficiency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 289-300.
4. Case, D. A., Ploog, B. O., & Fantino, E. (1990). Observing behavior in a computer game. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 185-199.
5. Dinsmoor, J. A. (1983). Observing behavior and conditioned reinforcement. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 693-704.
6. Fantino, E., & Case, D. A. (1983). Human observing: Maintained by stimuli correlated with reinforcement but not extinction. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 40, 193-210.
7. Fantino, E., Case, D. A., & Altus, D. (1983). Observing reward-informative and -uninformative stimuli by normal children of different ages. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 36, 437-452.
8. Fantino, E., Kulik, J., Stolarz-Fantino, S., & Wright, W. (1997). The conjunction fallacy: A test of averaging hypotheses. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 96-101.
9. Fantino, E., & Logan, C. A. (1979). The experimental analysis of behavior: A biological perspective. San Francisco: Freeman.
10. Fantino, E., & Savastano, H. I. (1996). Humans' responses to novel stimulus compounds and the effects of training. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 204-207.
11. Goodie, A. S. (1997). Base-rate neglect under direct experience. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego. Dissertation Abstracts International.
12. Goodie, A. S., & Fantino, E. (1995). An experientially derived base-rate error in humans. Psychological Science, 6, 101-106.
13. Goodie, A. S., & Fantino, E. (1996). Learning to commit or avoid the base-rate error. Nature, 380, 247-249.
14. Haiti, J. A., & Fantino, E. (1996). Choice as a function of reinforcement ratios in delayed matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 66, 11-27.
15. Humphreys, L. G. (1939). Acquisition and extinction of verbal expectations in a situation analogous to conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 294-301.
16. Jenkins, H. M., & Boakes, R. A. (1973). Observing stimulus sources that signal food or no food. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 197-207.
17. Kahneman, E., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
18. Mulvaney, D. E., Dinsmoor, J. A., Jwaideh, A. R., & Hughes, L. H. (1974). Punishment of observing by the negative discriminative stimulus. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 37-44.
19. Smith, V. L., & Walker, J. M. (1993). Monetary rewards and decision cost in experimental economics. Economic Inquiry, 31, 245-261.
20. Stolarz-Fantino, S., & Fantino, E. (1990). Cognition and behavior analysis: A review of Rachlin's Judgment, Decision, and Choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 317-322.
21. Stolarz-Fantino, S., & Fantino, E. (1995). The experimental analysis of reasoning: A review of Gilovich's How We Know What Isn't So. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 111-116.
22. Stolarz-Fantino, S., Fantino, E., & Kulik, J. (1996). The conjunction fallacy: Differential incidence as a function of descriptive frames and educational context. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 208-218.
23. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982a). Evidential impact of base rates. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 153-160). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
24. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982b). Judgements of and by representativeness. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 84-98). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambrige University Press.
25. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293-315.
26. Wyckoff, L. B., Jr. (1952). The role of observing responses in discrimination learning: Part 1. Psychological Review, 59, 431-442.