Using multilevel logistic regression to evaluate person-fit in IRT models

Multivariate Behavioral Research

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 543-568

  Reise, Steven P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034346292     PISSN: 00273171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3504_06     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Albert, J. H. (1992). Bayesian estimation of normal ogive item response curves using Gibbs sampling. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 251-269.
2. Barcikowski, R. S. (1981). Statistical power with group mean as the unit of analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 267-285.
3. Baumeister, R. F. & Tice, D. M. (1988). Metatraits. Journal of Personality, 56, 571-597.
4. Bem, D. J. & Allen, A. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 506-520.
5. Blair, R. C., Higgins, J. J., Topping, M. E., & Mortimer, A. L. (1983). An investigation of the robustness of the t test to unit of analysis violations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 69-80.
6. Bock, R. D. (1989). Multilevel analysis of educational data. New York: Academic Press.
7. Braun, H. I., Jones, D. H., Rubin, D. B., & Thayer, D. T. (1983). Empirical Bayes estimation of coefficients in the general linear model from data of deficient rank. Psychometrika, 48, 2, 171-181.
8. Bryk, A. S. & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9. Bryk, A. S. & Raudenbush, S. W., & Congdon, R. (1996). HLM: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L programs. Chicago: Scientific Software.
10. Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., & Williams, E. A (1985). Appropriateness measurement with polychotomous item response models and standardized indices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 67-86.
11. Efron, B. & Morris, C. (1973). Combining possibly related estimation problems. The Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 35, 3, 311-319.
12. Embretson, S. E. & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item Response Theory for psychologists. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Fekken, G. C. & Jackson, D. N. (1988). Predicting consistent psychological test item responses: A comparison of models. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 873-882
14. Fox, J. P. & Glas, C. A. W. (1998). Multi-level IRT with measurement error in the predictor variables. Research Report 98-16, University of Twente: The Netherlands.
15. Goldstein, H. (1991). Nonlinear multilevel models, with an application to discrete response data. Biometrika, 78, 45-51.
16. Hambleton, R. K. & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory: Principles and applications. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. Hedeker, D. & Gibbons, R. D. (1994). A random-effects ordinal regression model for multilevel analysis. Biometrics, 50, 933-944.
18. Hedeker, D., Gibbons, R. D., & Flay, B. R. (1994). Random-effects regression models for clustered data: with an example from smoking prevention research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 757-765.
19. Hedeker, D. & Mermelstein, R. J. (1996). Applications of random-effects regression models in relapse research. Addiction, 91, (Supplements), S211-S229.
20. Jackson D N. (1986). The process of responding in personality assessment. In A. Angleitner & J. S. Wiggins(Eds.). Personality assessment via questionnaires (p. 123-142). New York: Springer-Verlag.
21. Janssen, R., Tuerlinckx, F., Meulders, M., & De Boeck, P. (1997). An hierarchical IRT model for standard setting. Research Report 97-5 University of Leuven: Belgium.
22. Kreft, I. & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage
23. Lanning, K. (1988). Individual differences in scalability: An alternative conception of consistency for personality theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 142-148.
24. Levine, M. V. & Rubin, D. B. (1979). Measuring appropriateness of multiple-choice test scores. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 269-290.
25. Lumsden, J. (1977). Person reliability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 477-482.
26. Lumsden, J. (1978). Tests are perfectly reliable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 19-26.
27. Meijer, R. R. (1996). Person-fit research: An introduction. Applied Measurement in Education, 9, 3-8.
28. Meijer, R. R. & Sijtsma, K. (1995). Detection of aberrant item score patterns: A review of recent developments. Applied Measurement in Education, 8, 261-272.
29. Morris, C. N. (1983). Parametric empirical Bayes inference: Theory and applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 47-55.
30. Nering, M. L. (1995). The distribution of person fit using true and estimated person parameters. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 121-129.
31. z person-fit statistic. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 1, 53-69.
32. Raudenbush, S. & Bryk, A. S. (1986). A hierarchical model for studying school effects. Sociology of Education, 59, 1-17.
33. Reise, S. P. (1995). Scoring method and the detection of person misfit in a personality assessment context. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 213-229.
34. Reise, S. P. & Flannery, Wm. P. (1996). Assessing person-fit on measures of typical performance. Applied Measurement in Education, 9, 9-26.
35. Reise, S. P. & Waller, N. G. (1993). Traitedness and the assessment of response pattern scalability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 143-151.
36. Stiratelli, R., Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1984). Random-effects models for serial observations with binary response, Biometrics, 40, 961-971.
37. Strandmark, N. L. & Linn, R. L. (1987). A generalized logistic item response model parameterizing test score inappropriateness. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 355-370.
38. Tatsuoka, K. K. (1984). Caution indices based on item response theory. Psychometrika, 49, 95-110.
39. Tatsuoka, K. K. (1996). Use of generalized person-fit indices, zetas for statistical pattern classification. Applied Measurement in Education, 9, 65-75.
40. Tellegen, A. (1988). The analysis of consistency in personality assessment. Journal of Personality, 56, 621-663.
41. Trabin, T. E. & Weiss, D. J. (1983). The person response curve: Fit of individuals to item characteristic curve models. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait test theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 83-108). New York: Academic Press.