Group overlap as a basis for effect size

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 543-563

  Huberty, Carl J ^a   Lowman, Laureen L ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034345407     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013164400604004     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alf, E., & Abrahams, N. M. (1968). Relationship between percent overlap and measures of correlation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 779-792.
2. Chow, S. L. (1988). Significance test or effect size? Psychological Bulletin, 103, 105-110.
3. Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
5. Coombs, W. T., Algina, J., & Oltman, D. O. (1996). Univariate and multivariate omnibus hypothesis tests selected to control type I error rates when population variances are not equal. Review of Educational Research, 66, 137-179.
6. Elster, R. S., & Dunnette, M. D. (1971). The robustness of Tilton's measure of overlap. Educational and Psychology Measurement, 31, 685-697.
7. Falk, R., & Greenbaum, C. W. (1995). Significance tests die hard. Theory & Psychology, 5, 75-98.
8. Fern, E. F., & Monroe, K. B. (1996). Effect-size estimates: Issues and problems in interpretation. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 89-105.
9. Frick, R. W. (1996). The appropriate use of null hypothesis testing. Psychological Methods, I, 379-390.
10. Greenwald, A. G., Gonzalez, R., Harris, R. J., & Guthrie, D. (1996). Effect sizes and p values: What should be reported and what should be replicated. Psychophysiology, 33, 175-183.
11. 2 tests. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 227-245.
12. Huberty, C. J (1994). Applied discriminant analysis. New York: John Wiley.
13. Huberty, C. J, DiStefano, C., & Kamphaus, R. W. (1997). Behavioral clustering of school children. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 105-134.
14. Huberty, C. J, & Holmes, S. E. ( 1983). Two-group comparisons and univariate classification. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 15-26.
15. Huberty, C. J, & Pike, C. J. (in press). On some history regarding statistical testing. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology (Vol. 6). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
16. Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746-759.
17. Levy, P. (1967). Substantive significance of significant differences between two groups. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 37-40.
18. Lix, L. M., & Keselman, H. J. (1995). Approximate degrees of freedom tests: A unified perspective on testing for mean equality. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 547-560.
19. Lix, L. M., & Keselman, H. J. (1998). To trim or not to trim: Tests of location equality under heteroscedasticity and nonnormality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 409-429.
20. Michael, W. B. (1966). An interpretation of the coefficients of predictive validity and of determination in terms of the proportions of correct inclusions or exclusions in cells of a fourfold table. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 26, 419-425.
21. Mulekar, M. S., & Mishra, S. N. (1997). Inference on measures of niche overlap for heteroscedastic normal populations. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences, 17, 163-185.
22. Murray, L. W., & Dosser, D. A. (1987). How significant is a significant difference? Problems with the measurement of magnitude of effect. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 68-72.
23. Oakes, M. (1986). Statistical inference. New York: John Wiley.
24. Oshima, T. C., & Algina, J. (1992). A SAS program for testing the hypothesis of the equal means under heteroscedasticity: James's second-order test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 117-118.
25. Preece, P.F.W. (1983). A measure of experimental effect size based on success rates. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 763-766.
26. Rencher, A. C. (1995). Methods of multivariate analysis. New York: John Wiley.
27. Richardson, J.T.E. (1996). Measures of effect size. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 12-22.
28. Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115-129.
29. Strube, M. J. (1988). Some comments on the use of magnitude-of-effect estimates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 342-345.
30. Tatsuoka, M. M. (1993). Effect size. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues (pp. 461-479). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Thompson, B. (1994). Guidelines for authors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 837-847.
32. Thompson, B. (1998). Statistical significance and effect size reporting: Portrait of a possible future. Research in the Schools, 5(2), 33-38.
33. Tilton, J. W. (1937). The measurement of overlapping. Journal of Educational Psychology, 28, 656-662.
34. Wilkinson, L., & The APA Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.