When doing better means feeling worse: The effects of categorical cutoff points on counterfactual thinking and satisfaction

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 72, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 1284-1296

  Medvec, Victoria Husted ^a,c   Savitsky, Kenneth ^b,d  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d WILLIAMS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031484075     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1284     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allison, S. T., Mackie, D. M., & Messick, D. M. (1996). Outcome biases in social perception: Implications for dispositional inference, attitude change, stereotyping, and social behavior. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 53-93). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2. Beauchamp, K. L., & May, R. B. (1964). Replication report: Interpretation of levels of significance by psychological researchers. Psychological Reports, 14, 272.
3. Boles, T. L., & Messick, D. M. (1995). A reverse outcome bias: The influence of multiple reference points on the evaluation of outcomes and decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 262-275.
4. Burgess, A. W., & Holstrom, L. (1979). Rape: Crisis and recovery. Bowie, MD: Brady.
5. Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85-113.
6. Davis, C. G., Lehman, D. R., Wortman, C. B., Silver, R. C., & Thompson, S. C. (1995). The undoing of traumatic life events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 109-124.
7. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
8. Frank, R. H., & Cook, D. (1995). The winner-take-all society. New York: Free Press.
9. Girotto, V., Legrenzi, P., & Rizzo, A. (1991). Event controllability in counterfactual thinking. Acta Psychologica, 78, 111-133.
10. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
11. Johnson, J. T. (1986). The knowledge of what might have been: Affective and attributional consequences of near outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 51-62.
12. Kahneman, D. (1995). Varieties of counterfactual thinking. In N. Roese & J. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 375-396). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
14. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
15. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982a). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 2, 160-173.
16. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982b). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201-208). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Kahneman, D., & Varey, C. A. (1990). Propensities and counterfactuals: The loser that almost won. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1101-1110.
18. Kee, J. L. (1995). Laboratory and diagnostic tests with nursing implications. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.
19. Markman, K. D., Gavanski, I., Sherman, S. J., & McMullen, M. N. (1993). The mental simulation of better and worse possible worlds. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 87-109.
20. Markman, K. D., Gavanski, I., Sherman, S. J., & McMullen, M. N. (1995). The impact of perceived control on the imagination of better and worse possible worlds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 588-595.
21. Medvec, V. H., Madey, S. F., & Gilovich, T. ( 1995). When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 603-610.
22. Miller, D. T., & Gunasegaram, S. (1990). Temporal order and the perceived mutability of events: Implications for blame assignment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1111-1118.
23. Miller, D. T., Turnbull, W., & McFarland, C. (1990). Counterfactual thinking and social perception: Thinking about what might have been. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 305-331). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24. Minturn, E. B., Lansky, L. M., & Dember, W. N. (1972). The interpretation of levels of significance by psychologists: A replication and extension. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston.
25. Nelson, N., Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1986). Interpretation of significance levels and effect sizes by psychological researchers. American Psychologist, 41, 1299-1301.
26. Olson, J. M., Herman, P., & Zanna, M. P. (1986). Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Roese, N. J. (1994). The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 805-818.
28. Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1993). The structure of counterfactual thought. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 312-319.
29. Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1995). Counterfactual thinking: A critical overview. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 1-55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Rosch, E., & Lloyd, B. (Eds.). (1978). Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Rosenthal, R., & Gaito, J. (1963). The interpretation of levels of significance by psychological researchers. The Journal of Psychology, 55, 33-38.
32. Rosenthal, R., & Gaito, J. (1964). Further evidence for the cliff effect in the interpretation of levels of significance. Psychological Reports, 15, 570.
33. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44, 1276-1284.
34. Siegel, S. (1964). Level of aspiration and decision making. In S. Messick & A. H. Brayfield (Eds.), Decision and choice: Contributions of Sidney Siegel (pp. 113-126). New York: McGraw-Hill.
35. Suis, J. M., & Miller, R. L. (1977). Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. New York: Wiley.
36. Tajfel, H., & Wilkes, A. L. (1963). Classification and quantitative judgment. British Journal of Psychology, 54, 101-114.
37. Taylor, S. E., & Lobel, M. (1989). Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychological Review, 96, 569-575.
38. Taylor, S. E., Wood, J. V., & Lichtman, R. R. (1983). It could be worse: Selective evaluation as a response to victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 19-40.
39. Tenbrunsel, A., Wade-Benzoni, K., Messick, D., & Bazerman, M. (1996). Reducing the dysfunctional effects of standards through the use of multiple standards. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University.