Capitalizing on large-scale mouse mutagenesis screens

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 109-115

  Justice, Monica J ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; DANIO RERIO; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; MAMMALIA; MELANOGASTER;

ANIMAL; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; DISEASE MODEL; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GENETICS; HUMAN; MALE; MOUSE; MUTAGENESIS; REVIEW; ZEBRA FISH;

ANIMALS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MALE; MICE; MUTAGENESIS; ZEBRAFISH;

EID: 0034331003     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/35038549     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Capecchi, M. R. Altering the genome by homologous recombination. Science 244, 1283-1292 (1989).
2. Bellen, H. J. Ten years of enhancer detection: Lessons from the fly. The Plant Cell 11, 2271-2281 (1999).
3. Zambrowicz, B. P. et al. Disruption and sequence identification of 2,000 genes in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature 392, 608-611 (1998).
4. Nolan, P. M. et al. A systematic genome-wide phenotype-driven mutagenesis programme for gene function studies in the mouse. Nature Genet. 25, 440-443 (2000).
5. Hrabe de Angelis, M. et al. Genome wide large scale production of mutant mice by ENU mutagenesis. Nature Genet. 25, 444-447 (2000). References 4 and 5 describe the first large-scale ENU mutagenesis screens in the mouse.
6. Rogers, D. C. et al. SHIRPA, a proposed protocol for comprehensive phenotype assessment. Mamm. Genome 8, 711-713 (1997).
7. Dunn, L. C. Studies on spotting patterns. II. Genetic analysis of variegated spotting in the house mouse. Genetics 22, 43-64 (1937).
8. Blake, J. A., Richardson, J. E., Davisson, M. T. & Eppig, J. T. The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): Genetic and genomic information about the laboratory mouse. The Mouse Genome Database Group. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 95-98 (1999). This paper describes the features of the Mouse Genome Database (MGD).
9. Sarvella, P. A. & Russell, L. B. Steel, a new dominant gene in the house mouse. J. Hered. 47, 123-128 (1956).
10. Taylor, B. A., Navin, A. & Phillips, S. J. PCR-amplification of simple sequence repeat variants from pooled DNA samples for rapidly mapping new mutations of the mouse. Genomics 21, 626-632 (1994).
11. Taylor, B. A. in Mouse Genetics and Transgenics: A Practical Approach (eds Jackson, I. J. & Abbott, C. M.) 87-120 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1999).
12. Nadeau, J. H. & Frankel, W. N. The roads from phenotypic variation to gene discovery: mutagenesis versus QTLs. Nature Genet. 25, 381-384 (2000).
13. Anderson, P. Mutagenesis. Methods Cell Biol. 48, 31-58 (1995).
14. Jansen, G., Hazendonk, E., Thijssen, K. L. & Plasterk, R. Reverse genetics by chemical mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature Genet. 17, 119-121 (1997).
15. Nusslein-Volhard, C., Wieschaus, E. & Kluding, H. Mutations affecting the pattern of the larval cuticle in Drosophila melanogaster I. Zygotic loci on the second chromosome. Roux's Archives Dev. Biol. 193, 267-282 (1984).
16. Wieschaus, E., Nusslein-Volhard, C. & Jurgens, G. Mutations affecting the pattern of the larval cuticle in Drosophila melanogaster III. Zygotic loci on the X-chromosome and fourth chromosome. Roux's Archives Dev. Biol. 193, 296-307 (1984).
17. Jurgens, G., Wieschaus, E., Nusslein-Volhard, C. & Kluding, H. Mutations affecting the pattern of the larval cuticle in Drosophila melanogaster II. Zygotic loci on the third chromosome. Roux's Archives Dev. Biol. 193, 283-295 (1984).
18. Gans, M., Audit, C. & Masson, M. Isolation and characterization of sex-linked female-sterile mutants in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 81, 683-704 (1975).
19. Nusslein-Volhard, C. & Wieschaus, E. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature 287, 795-801 (1980).
20. Miklos, G. L. & Rubin, G. M. The role of the genome project in determining gene function: Insights from model organisms. Cell 86, 521-529 (1996).
21. Haffter, P. et al. The identification of genes with unique and essential functions in the development of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Development 123, 1-36 (1996).
22. Driever, W. et al. A genetic screen for mutations affecting embryogenesis in zebrafish. Development 123, 37-46 (1996).
23. Postlethwait, J. H. et al. Vertebrate genome evolution and the zebrafish gene map. Nature Genet. 18, 345-349 (1998).
24. Amsterdam, A. et al. A large-scale insertional mutagenesis screen in zebrafish. Genes Dev. 13, 2713-2724 (1999).
25. Hakim, F. T. et al. Hereditary joint disorder in progressive ankylosis (ank/ank) mice, Arthritis Rheum. 27, 1411-1420 (1984).
26. Ho, A. M., Johnson, M. D. & Kingsley, D. M. Role of the mouse ank gene in control of tissue calcification and arthritis. Science 289, 265-270 (2000).
27. Battey, J., Jordan, E., Cox, D. & Dove, W. An action plan for mouse genomics. Nature Genet. 21, 73-75 (1999). This paper explains the rationale for the trans-NIH mouse Initiatives.
28. Denny, P. & Justice, M. J. Mouse as the measure of man? Trends Genet. 16, 283-287 (2000).
29. Finkel, E. Australian 'ranch' gears up to mass-produce mutant mice. Science 288, 1572-1573 (2000).
30. Zheng, B., Mills, A. A. & Bradley, A. A system for rapid generation of coat color-tagged knockouts and defined chromosomal rearrangements in mice. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 2354-2360 (1999).
31. Zheng, B. et al. Engineering a balancer chromosome in the mouse. Nature Genet. 22, 375-378 (1999). A seminal paper that describes chromosomal engineering techniques to generate a coat-colour tagged balancer chromosome for genetic studies in the mouse.
32. Munro, R. J. et al. Mouse mutants from chemically mutagenized embryonic stem cells. Nature Genet. 24, 318-321 (2000).
33. Chen, Y. et al. Genotype-based screen for ENU-induced mutations in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature Genet. 24, 314-317 (2000). References 32 and 33 describe the use of point mutagens for gene-based screens in mouse embryonic stem cells.
34. Eppig, J. T. Algorithms for mutant sorting: The need for phenotype vocabularies. Mamm. Genome 11, 584-589 (2000).
35. Hitotsumachi, S., Carpenter, D. A. & Russell, W. L. Dose-repetition increases the mutagenic effectiveness of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea in mouse spermatogonia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 6619-6621 (1985).
36. Shedlovsky, A., McDonald, J. D., Symula, D. & Dove, W. F. Mouse models of human phenylketonuria. Genetics 134, 1205-1210 (1993).
37. Justice, M. J. in Mouse Genetics and Transgenics: A Practical Approach (eds Jackson, I. J. & Abbott, C. M.) 185-215 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1999).
38. Justice, M. J., Noveroske, J. N., Weber, J. S., Zheng, B. & Bradley, A. Mouse ENU mutagenesis. Human Genet. 8, 1955-1963 (1999).