Hard-copy versus soft-copy with and without simple image manipulation for detection of pulmonary nodules and masses

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 420-424

  Kosuda, Shigeru ^a   Kaji, T ^a   Kobayashi, H ^a   Watanabe, M ^a   Iwasaki, Y ^a   Kusano, S ^a  

^a NATIONAL DEFENSE MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Image manipulation; Primary lung neoplasms, digital radiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LUNG COIN LESION; LUNG DISEASE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

ADULT; COIN LESION, PULMONARY; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DATA DISPLAY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LUNG DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 0034269024     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/028418500127345848     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. CARR J. J., REED J. C., CHOPLIN R. H., POPE T. L. JR & CASE L. D.: Plain and computed radiography for detecting experimentally induced pneumothorax in cadavers. Implications for detection in patients. Radiology 183 (1992), 193.
2. FAJARDO L. L., HILLMAN B. J., POND G. D., CARMODY R. F., JOHNSON J. E. & FERELL W. R.: Detection of pneumothorax. Comparison of digital and conventional chest imaging. AJR 152 (1989), 475.
3. FOLEY W. D., WILSON C. R. & SAN DRETTO M.: The effect of varying high pass filter parameters on the detectability of isolated pulmonary nodules in digitized chest images. Invest. Radiol. 21 (1986), 305.
4. GREENE R. E.: Missed lung nodules. Lost opportunities for cancer cure. Radiology 182 (1992), 8.
5. ITO S., KOYAMA S., TUSAKA M. et al.: Fundamental study for lung-cancer screening by helical CT. First report. Evaluation of radiation dose and image quality using a phantom. Nippon Acta Radiol. 56 (1996), 731.
6. KRAUSE M., BRADO M., SCHOSSER R. et al.: Diagnostic accuracy in remote expert consultation using standard video-conference technology. Eur. Radiol. 6 (1996), 932.
7. KRUPINSKI E. A., EVANOFF M., OVITT T., STANDEN J. R., CHU T. X. & JOHNSON J.: Influence of image processing on chest radiograph interpretation and decision changes. Acad. Radiol. 5 (1998), 79.
8. KUNDEL H. L., GEFTER W., ARONCHICK J. et al.: Accuracy of bedside chest hard-copy screen-film versus hard-and soft-copy computed radiographs in a medical intensive care unit. Receiver operating characteristic analysis. Radiology 205 (1997), 85.
9. KUSHNER D. C., CLEVELAND R. H., HERMAN T. E. et al.: Low-dose flying spot digital radiography of the chest. Sensitivity studies. Radiology 163 (1987), 685.
10. LYTTKENS K., ANDERSSON B., KEHLER M. & LINDBERG L.: Bedside chest radiography using digital luminescence. A comparison between digital radiographs reviewed on a personal computer and as hard-copies. Acta Radiol. 33 (1992) 427.
11. MACMAHON H., VYBORNY C. J., METZ C. E., DOI K., SABETI V. & SOLOMON S. L.: Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities. An ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance. Radiology 158 (1986), 21.
12. NIKLASON L. T., CHAN H. P., CASCADE P. N., CHANG C. L., CHEE P. W. & MATHEWS J. F.: Portable chest imaging. Comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems. Radiology 186 (1993), 387.
13. OESTMANN J. W., KUSHNER D. C., BOURGOUIN P. M., LLEWELLYN H. J., MOCKBEE B. W. & GREENE R.: Subtle lung cancers. Impact of edge enhancement and gray scale reversal on detection with digitized chest radiographs. Radiology 167 (1988), 657.
14. OJSERKIS B. E.: Are digital chest x-rays good enough? Chest 113 (1998), 256.
15. SAVCENKO V., ERICKSON B. J., PALISSON P. M. et al.: Detection of subtle abnormalities on chest radiographs after irreversible compression. Radiology 206 (1998), 609.
16. SCHAEFER C. M., GREENE R., LLEWELLYN H. J. et al.: Interstitial lung disease. Impact of post-processing in digital storage phosphor imaging. Radiology 178 (1991), 733.
17. SCHAEFER C. M. M., GREENE R., OESTMANN J. W. et al.: Digital storage phosphor imaging versus conventional film radiography in CT-documented chest disease. Radiology 174 (1990), 207.
18. SCOTT W. W., BLUEMKE D. A., MYSKO W. K. et al.: Interpretation of emergency department radiographs by radiologists and emergency medicine physicians. Teleradiology workstation versus radiograph readings. Radiology 195 (1995), 223.
19. SCOTT W. W., ROSENBAUM J. E., ACKERMAN S. J. et al.: Subtle orthopedic fractures. Teleradiography workstation versus film interpretation. Radiology 187 (1993), 811.
20. SLASKY B. S., GUR D., GOOD W. F. et al.: Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images. Radiology 174 (1990), 775.
21. SONE S., TAKASHIMA S., LI F. et al.: Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile computed tomography scanner. Lancet 351 (1998), 1242.
22. SONODA M., TAKANO M., MIYAHARA J. & KATO H.: Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence. Radiology 148 (1983), 833.
23. STORMER J., BOLLE S. R., SUND T., WELLER G. E. R. & GITLIN J. N.: ROC-study of a teleradiography workstation versus film readings. Acta Radiol. 38 (1997), 176.
24. STRAUB W. H., GUR D., GOOD W. F. et al.: Primary CT diagnosis of abnormal masses in a PACS environment. Radiology 178 (1991), 739.
25. TYLÉN U.: Digital chest radiography. Clinical aspects. J. Digit. Imaging 8 (1995), Suppl. 1., p. 15.
26. WANDTKE J. C.: Bedside chest radiography. Radiology 190 (1994), 1.