ROC-study of a teleradiology workstation versus film readings

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 176-180

  Størmer, Jan ^a   Bolle, S R ^a   Sund, T ^b   Weller, G E R ^c   Gitlin, J N ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH NORWAY   (Norway)

^b TELENOR RESEARCH   (Norway)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

ROC analysis; Teleradiology, digitization

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BONE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; NORWAY; RADIOGRAPHY; ROC CURVE; STATISTICS; TELERADIOLOGY; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; UNITED STATES; X RAY FILM;

BALTIMORE; BONE AND BONES; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; NORWAY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, ABDOMINAL; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; ROC CURVE; TELERADIOLOGY; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 0347203312     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841859709171264     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ANDRUS W. S., DREYFUSS J. R., JAFFER F. & BIRD K. T.: Interpretation of roentgenograms via interactive television. Radiology 116 (1975), 25.
2. CURTIS D. J., GAYLER B. W., GITLIN J. N. & HARRINGTON M. B.: Teleradiology. Results of a field trial. Radiology 149 (1993), 415.
3. GOLDBERG M. A., ROSENTHAL D. I., CHEW F. S., BLICKMAN J. G., MILLER S. W. & MUELLER P. R.: New high-resolution teleradiology system. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy in 685 transmitted clinical cases. Radiology 186 (1993), 429.
4. KEHLER M., ALBRECHTSSON U., ANDRÉSDÓTTIR A. et al.: Digital luminescence radiography in interstitial lung disease. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Acta Radiol. 32 (1991), 18.
5. KIRKWOOD B. R.: Essentials of medical statistics. Blackwell, Oxford 1988.
6. MARKIVEE C. R., MAHANTA B., SAVCI S. et al.: Diagnostic accuracy of a teleradiology image transmission system. M. D. Computing 6 (1989), 88.
7. PAAKKALA T., AALTO J., KAHARA V. & SEPPANEN S.: Diagnostic performance of a teleradiology system in primary health care. Comput. Meth. Progr. Biomed. 36 (1991), 157.
8. RAZAVI M., SAYRE J. W., SIMONS M. et al.: Clinical evaluation of a 2Kx2K workstation for primary diagnosis in pediatric radiology. In: Medical imaging V, PACS design and evaluation, p. 24. Edited by R. G. Jost. Int. Soc. Opt. Engineering, San Jose, CA 1991.
9. SACKETT D. L., HAYNES R. B. & TUGWELL P.: Clinical epidemiology. A basic science for clinical medicine. Little Brown & Co., Boston 1985.
10. SCOTT W. W., BLUEMKE D. A., MYSKO W. K. et al.: Interpretation of emergency department radiographs by radiologists and emergency medicine physicians. Teleradiology workstation versus radiograph readings. Radiology 195 (1995), 223.
11. SCOTT W. W., ROSENBAUM J. E., ACKERMAN S. J. et al.: Subtle orthopedic fractures. Teleradiology workstation versus film interpretation. Radiology 187 (1993), 811.
12. SLOVIS T. L. & GUZZARDO-DOBSON P. R.: The clinical usefulness of teleradiology of neonates. Expanded services without expanded staff. Pediatr. Radiol. 21 (1991), 333.
13. STØRMER J.: Organizational aspects of IMAC introduction. Nordic model of radiological/clinical conference. Comput. Meth. Progr. Biomed. 36 (1991), 103.
14. SUND T.: Mira - teleradiology and digital radiology. Telenor R&D, Telektronikk 89 (1993), 33.
15. SUND T. & STØRMER J.: Experiences from 2 1/2 years of routine teleradiology. In: Computer assisted radiology, p. 697. Edited by H. U. Lemke et al. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1995.
16. WENZEL A.: Effect of varying gray-scale resolution for detectability of bone lesions in intraoral radiographs digitized for teletransmission. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 95 (1987), 483.