Influence of image processing on chest radiograph interpretation and decision changes

Academic Radiology

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 79-85

  Krupinski, E A ^a   Evanoff, M ^a   Ovitt, T ^a   Standen, J R ^a   Chu, T X ^a   Johnson, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Diagnostic radiology; Images; Interpretation; Observer performance; Processing; Radiography; Thorax

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

EID: 0031824147     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(98)80126-8     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kundel HL Revesz G Stauffer HM Evaluation of a television image processing system Invest Radiol 3 1968 44 50
2. Kheddache S Denbratt L Angelhed JA Digital chest radiography: optimizing image processing parameters for the visibility of chest lesions and anatomy Eur J Radiol 22 1996 241 245
3. Britton CA Gabriele OF Chang TS Subjective quality assessment of computed radiography hand images J Digital Imaging 9 1996 21 24
4. Armstrong JD Sorenson JA Nelson JA Clinical evaluation of unsharp masking and slit scanning techniques in chest radiography Radiology 147 1983 351 356
5. Sheline ME Brikman I Epstein DM Mezrich JL Kundel HL Arenson RL The diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: comparison between standard and inverse digitized images and conventional chest radiographs AJR 152 1989 261 263
6. Ishida M Doi K Loo LN Metz CE Lehr JL Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low contrast radiographic patterns Radiology 150 1984 569 575
7. Nodine CF Liu H Miller WT Kundel HL Observer performance in the localization of tubes and catheters on digital chest images: the role of expertise and image enhancement Acad Radiol 3 1996 834 841
8. Gennari RC Gur D Miketic LM Campbell WL Oliver JH Plunkett MB Non-portable CR of the chest: radiologists' acceptance Proc SPIE 2166 1994 105 110
9. Rosenthal MS Good WF Costa-Greco MA The effect of image processing on chest radiograph interpretations in a PACS environment Invest Radiol 25 1990 897 901
10. Oestmann JW Kushner DC Bourgouin PM Llewellyn HJ Mockbee BW Greene R Subtle lung cancers: impact of edge enhancement and gray scale reversal on detection with digitized chest radiographs Radiology 167 1988 657 658
11. MacMahon H Metz CE Doi K Kim T Giger ML Chan HP Digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video, and reversed gray scale video display formats Radiology 168 1988 669 673
12. Oestmann JW Greene R Rubens JR High frequency edge enhancement in the detection of fine pulmonary lines: parity between storage phosphor digital images and conventional chest radiography Invest Radiol 24 1989 643 646
13. Chan HP Vyborny CJ MacMahon H Digital mammography: ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications Invest Radiol 22 1987 581 589
14. Ishigaki T Endo T Ikeda M Subtle pulmonary disease: detection with computed radiography versus conventional chest radiography Radiology 201 1996 51 60
15. Rehm K Ovitt TW Digital image processing of chest radiographs to compensate for the limitations of video displays J Electronic Imaging 2 1993 264 271
16. Sherrier RH Chiles C Wilkinson WE Johnson GA Ravin CE Effects of image processing on nodule detection rates in digitized chest radiographs: ROC study of observer performance Radiology 166 1988 447 450
17. Kelsey CA Lane RG Moseley RD Chest radiographs obtained with shaped filters: evaluation by observer performance tests Radiology 159 1986 653 655
18. Goodman LR Foley WD Wilson CR Tikofsky RS Hoffman RG Pneumothorax and other lung diseases: effect of altered resolution and edge enhancement on diagnosis with digitized radiographs Radiology 167 1988 83 88
19. Melson DL Slone RM Comparison of hard- and soft-copy viewing of computed radiography portable chest images Proc SPIE 3035 1992 329 334
20. Pizer SM Intensity mappings to linearize display devices Comput Graphics Image Processing 17 1981 262 268
21. Dorfman DD Berbaum KS Metz CE Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method Invest Radiol 27 1992 723 731
22. Ferguson GA Statistical analysis in psychology and education 1981 McGraw-Hill 401 402
23. Christensen EE Murry RC Holland K Reynolds J Landay MJ Moore JG The effect of search time on perception Radiology 138 1981 361 365
24. Metz CE Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies Invest Radiol 24 1989 234 245