Microleakage and adaptation of Class II packable resin-based composites using incremental or bulk filling techniques

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 205-208

  Gallo III, John R ^a,b   Bates, Michael L ^b   Burgess, John O ^b  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HLTH SCI C   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALERT COMPOSITE RESIN; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENTS; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DYE; RESIN; SOLITAIRE; SUREFIL PACKABLE COMPOSITE;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; GINGIVA; HUMAN; LIGHT; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PREMOLAR TOOTH; THERMODYNAMICS; TOOTH; TOOTH DISEASE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; BICUSPID; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DYES; GINGIVA; HUMAN; LIGHT; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; THERMODYNAMICS; TOOTH CERVIX;

EID: 0034252388     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Rowe A. A 5-year study of the clinical performance of a posterior composite resin restorative material. J Dent 1989; 17: Suppl 1: S6-9.
2. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thomson VP, Holston AM, et al. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 143-151.
3. Wilson HF, Wilson MA, Wastell DG, et al. Performance of occlusion in butt-joint and bevel-edged preparation: Five-year results. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 92-98.
4. Geurtsen W, Schoelar J. Four-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and II composite fillings. J Dent 1997; 25: 229-232.
5. Boksman L, Jordon RE, Suzuki M, et al. A visible light-cured posterior composite resin: Rsults of a 3-year clinical evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 1986; 112: 627-631.
6. Jordan RE, Suzuki M. Posterior composite restorations: Where and how they work best. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 122:30-37.
7. Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Sealing performance of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Z-100 in Class II restorations. Am J Dent 1996; 4: 145-149.
8. Hilton TJ, Schwarte RS, Ferracane JL. Microleakage of four Class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 135-144.
9. Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of Class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106: 1033-1042.
10. Krejci I, Lutz F, Krejci D. The influence of different base materials on marginal adaptation and wear of conventional Class II composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1998; 19: 191-198.
11. Stratman RG, Donly KJ. Microleakage of Class II silver glass ionomer/composite restorations. Am J Dent 1991; 4: 95-98.
12. Lundin SA, Nören JG. Marginal leakage in occlusally loaded, etched Class II composite resin restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1991; 49: 247-254.
13. Lui JL, Shigeyuki M, Setros JC, et al. Margin quality and microleakage of Class II composite resin restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;114:49-54.
14. Shortall A, Asmussen E. Influence of dentin bonding agents and a glass ionomer base on the cervical marginal seal of Class II composite restorations. Scand J Dent 1998; 96: 390-394.
15. Yap AU, Pearson GJ, Billington RW. An in vitro microleakage study of three restorative techniques for Class II restorations in posterior teeth. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 2031-2035.
16. Dietrich T, Losche AC, Losche GM, et al. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restoration in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine. J Dent 1999; 27:119-128.
17. The Dental Advisor 1998; Vol 15, No 7, 1-2.
18. Coli P, Brännström M. The marginal adaptation of four different bonding agents in Class II composite resin restorations applied in bulk or in two increments. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 583-591.
19. Affleck MS, Denehy GE, Vargas MA, et al. Microleakage with incremental vs. bulk placement utilizing condensable composites. J Dent Res 1999; 78: 155 (Abstr 393).
20. Cooley R, Barkmeirer W. Dental shear bond strength, microleakage and contraction gap of visible light-polymerized liners/bases. Quintessence Int 1991;22: 467-474.
21. Crim GA, Chapman KW. Effect of placement techniques on microleakage of a dentin-bonded composite resin. Quintessence Int 1986;17:21-24.
22. Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, Peters MC. Curing light performance and polymerization of composite restorative materials. J Dent 1992;20:183-188.
23. Pires JA, Cvitko E, Denehy GE, et al. Effects of curing tip distance on light intensity and composite resin microhardness. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 517-521.
24. Miyazaki M, Hinoura K, Onose H, et al. Influence of light intensity on shear bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 1995; 8: 245-248.
25. McCabe JF, Carrick TE. Output from visible-light activated units and depth of cure of light-activated composites. J Dent Res 1989;68:1534-1539.
26. Hinoura K, Miyazaki M, Onose H. Effect of irradiation time to light-cured resin composite on dentin bond strength. Am J Dent 1991; 4: 273-276.
27. Rueggeberg FA, Jordan D. Light tip distance and cure of resin composite, J Dent Res 1992; 71: 188 (Abstr 661).
28. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Curtis JW, et al. Factors affecting cure at depths within light activated resin composites. Am J Dent 1993; 6: 91-95.
29. Dant S, Burgess JO, Xu X. Light guide distance from curing surface and bond strength. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 452 (Abstr 2470).
30. Pilo R, Oelgesser D, Cardash HS. A survey of output intensity and potential depth of cure among light-curing units in clinical use. J Dent 1999; 27:235-241.
31. Miyazaki M, Hattori T, Ichiishi Y, et al. Evaluation of curing units used in private dental offices. Oper Dent 1998; 23:50-54.
32. Watts DC, Amer O, Combre EC. Characteristics of visible-light-activated composite systems. Br Dent J 1984; 156: 209-215.
33. Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Rhodes B. Visible light-activated resins-depth of cure. J Am Dent Assoc 1983; 106: 634-637.
34. Craig RG. Chemistry, composition, and properties of composite resins. Dent Clin North Am 1981; 25: 219-239.
35. Thonemann B, Fenderlin M, Schmalz G, et al. Total bonding vs. selective bonding: marginal adaptation of Class 2 composite restorations. Oper Dent 1999; 24: 261-271.
36. Prati C, Tao L, Simpson M, et al. Permeability and microleakage of Class II resin composite restorations. J Dent 1994; 22: 49-56.
37. Gwinnett JA, Tay FR, Pang KM, et al. Comparison of three methods of critical evaluation of microleakage along restorative interfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 6: 575-585.
38. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 1991; 7:107-113.
39. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Curing contraction of composites and glass ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59:297-300.
40. Schubach P, Krejci I, Lutz F. Dentin bonding: Effect of tubule orientation on hybrid-layer formation. Eur J Oral Sci 1997; 105:344-352.
41. Staninec M, Kawakami M. Adhesion and microleakage tests of a new dentin bonding system. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 204-208.
42. Fortin D, Swift EJ, Denehy G. Bond strength and microleakage of three new dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 1994; 10:315-318.
43. Swift EJ, Triolo PT, Barkmeier WW, et al. Effect of low viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 100-103.
44. da Cunha Mello FS, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, et al. Sealing ability of eight resin bonding systems in a Class II restoration after mechanical fatiguing. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 372-376.
45. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Comparison of the marginal integrity of in vivo and in vitro Class II composite restorations. J Dent 1993;21:158-162.
46. Thonemann BM, Federlin M, Schmalz G, et al. SEM analysis of marginal expansion and gap formation in Class II composite restorations. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 192-197.