An in vitro microleakage study of three restorative techniques for Class II restorations in posterior teeth

Biomaterials

Volumn 17, Issue 21, 1996, Pages 2031-2035

  Yap, A U J ^a   Pearson, G J ^a   Billington, R W ^a   Stokes, A N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adhesive; Class II restorations; Dental materials; Glass ionomer cement; Laminate; Microleakage

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVES; IONOMERS; LAMINATED COMPOSITES; REINFORCEMENT; THERMAL CYCLING; WEAR RESISTANCE;

ARTIFICIAL SALIVA; CLASS II RESTORATIONS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENT; MICROLEAKAGE; OPEN SANDWICH TECHNIQUE; RESTORATIVE MATERIALS; TEETH;

DENTAL CEMENT;

GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; TOOTH CEMENT;

ARTICLE; DENTIN; DENTISTRY; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0030298480     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)00036-1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. 1 Glenn JF. Composition and properties of unfilled and composite resin restorative materials. In: Smith DC, Williams DF, eds. Biocompatibility of Dental Materials, Vol. III. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1982: 97-130.
2. 2 Bryant RW, Mahler DB. Modulus of elasticity in bending of composites and amalgams. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 56: 243-248.
3. 3 Leinfelder KF. Posterior composites: state-of-the art clinical applications. Dental Clinics of North America 1993; 37: 411-418.
4. 4 Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials. J Dent Res 1955; 34: 948-953.
5. 5 Hagger O. Verfahren zum Verkleben von Flachen. Swiss Patent 278,946: 1951.
6. 6 Pearson GJ, Cassin A-M. Cuspal movement and microleakage around reinforced glass ionomer cements. Clinical Materials 1993; 12: 77-81.
7. 7 Miller Yardley R. Alternatives to amalgam alloy. Br Dent J 1984; 157: 431-435.
8. 8 Simmons JJ. The miracle mixture. Glass ionomer and alloy powder. Tex Dent J 1983; Oct: 6-12.
9. 9 McLean JW, Gasser O. Powdered dental material and process for preparation thereof. US Patent 4,577,979: 1985.
10. 10 Williams JA, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The comparative strengths of commercial glass ionomer cements with and without metal additions. Br Dent J 1992; 172: 279-282.
11. 11 Jones CS. Posterior use of modern glass ionomer cement. Scot Dent 1995; March: 24-25.
12. 12 Barkmeier WW, Erickson RL. Shear bond strength of composite to enamel and dentine using Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 175-179.
13. 13 Holtan JR, Nystrom GP, Rensch SE, Phelps RA, Douglas RH. Microleakage of five dental adhesives. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 189-193.
14. 14 Roeters FJM, Opsam NJM. Microleakage in box-type Class II resin composite restorations. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 427, Abs 210.
15. 15 Triolo PT, Swift EJ, Mudgil A, Levine A. Effect of etching time on enamel bond strengths. Am J Dent 1993; 6: 302-304.
16. 16 Fortin D, Swift EJ, Denehy GE, Reinhardt JW. Bond strength and microleakage of current dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 253-258.
17. 17 Swift EJ, Denehy GE, Beck MD. Use of phosphoric acid etchants with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. Am J Dent 1993; 6: 88-90.
18. 18 Swift EJ, Cloe BC. Shear bond strengths of new enamel etchants. Am J Dent 1993; 6: 162-164.
19. 19 Darbyshtre PA, Messer LB, Douglas WH. Microleakage in Class II composite restorations bonded to dentine using thermal and load cycling. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 585-587.
20. 20 Erickson RL, Jensen ME. Effect of pressure cycling on microleakage at the composite restoration margins. J Dent Res 1986; 65: 825, Abs 895.
21. 21 Jorgensen KD, Martono R, Shimoke H. Deformation of cavities and resin fillings in loaded teeth. Scan J Dent Res 1976; 84: 46-52.
22. 22 Davidson CL, Abdullah AI. Effect of occlusal load cycling on marginal integrity of adhesive Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 111-114.
23. 23 Gwinnett AJ, YS. Effect of long-term storage on dentin bonding. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 175-179.
24. 24 Tobias RS, Browne RM, Plant GC, Williams JA, Rippin JW. Pulpal response to two semihydrous glass ionomer luting cements. Int Endo J 1991; 24: 95-107.
25. 25 Plant CG, Tobias RS, Rippin JW, Brooks JW, Browne RM. A study of the relationship among pulpal response, microbial leakage, and particle heterogeneity in a glass-ionomer base material. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 217-224.