Transsaccadic memory for position and orientation of saccade source and target

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 1243-1259

  Verfaillie, Karl ^a   De Graef, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NERVE CONDUCTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; FEMALE; GENERALIZATION, STIMULUS; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REFRACTORY PERIOD, ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL; SACCADES; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0034243812     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.4.1243     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ahlström, V., Blake, R., & Ahlström, U. (1997). Perception of biological motion. Perception, 26, 1539-1548.
2. Bertenthal, B. I., & Pinto, J. (1994). Global processing of biological motions. Psychological Science, 5, 221-225.
3. Bülthoff, H. H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 89, 60-64.
4. Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., & Irwin, D. E. (1995). Memory for structural information across saccadic eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1441-1458.
5. Crane, H. D. (1994). The Purkinje image eyetracker, image stabilization, and related forms of stimulus manipulation. In D. H. Kelly (Ed.), Visual science and engineering: Models and applications (pp. 15-89). New York: Marcel Dekker.
6. Crane, H. D., & Steele, C. M. (1985). Generation-V dual-Purkinje-image eyetracker. Applied Optics, 24, 527-537.
7. Currie, C., McConkie, G. W., Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., & Irwin, D. E. (in press). Maintaining visual stability across saccades: Role of the saccade target object. Perception & Psychophysics.
8. Cutting, J. E. (1978). A program to generate synthetic walkers as dynamic point light displays. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 10, 91-94.
9. Daems, A., & Verfaillie, K. (1999). Viewpoint-dependent priming effects in the perception of human actions and body postures. Visual Cognition, 6, 665-693.
10. De Graef, P. (1998). Prefixational object perception in scenes: Objects popping out of schemas. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 315-338). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
11. Deubel, H., Bridgeman, B., & Schneider, W. X. (1998). Immediate postsaccadic information mediates space constancy. Vision Research, 38, 3147-3159.
12. Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827-1837.
13. Deubel, H., Schneider, W. X., & Bridgeman, B. (1996). Postsaccadic target blanking prevents saccadic suppression of image displacement. Vision Research, 36, 985-996.
14. Deubel, H., Wolf, W., & Hauske, G. (1982). Corrective saccades: Effects of shifting the saccade goal. Vision Research, 22, 353-364.
15. Deubel, H., Wolf, W., & Hauske, G. (1984). The evaluation of the oculomotor error signal. In A. G. Gale & F. Johnson (Eds.), Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 55-62). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
16. Getting from point A to point B: Kent forum examines how humans, animals, and machines chart a course. (1997, May/June). APS Observer, pp. 14-15, 32.
17. Henderson, J. M. (1992). Visual attention and eye movement control during reading and picture viewing. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 260-283). New York: Springer-Verlag.
18. Henderson, J. M. (1994). Two representational systems in dynamic visual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 410-426.
19. Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A. Jr., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 210-228.
20. Heywood, S., & Churcher, J. (1981). Direction-specific and position-specific effects upon detection of displacements during saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 21, 255-261.
21. Irwin, D. E. (1992). Memory for position and identity across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 307-317.
22. Irwin, D. E. (1996). Integrating information across saccadic eye movements. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 94-100.
23. Irwin, D. E., & Andrews, R. V. (1996). Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 125-155). Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
24. Irwin, D. E., McConkie, G. W., Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., & Currie, C. (1994). A localist evaluation solution for visual stability across saccades. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 265-266.
25. Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
26. Johansson, G. (1975, June). Visual motion perception. Scientific American, 232, 76-88.
27. Jüttner, M. (1997). Effects of perceptual context on transsaccadic visual matching. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 762-773.
28. Lamote, C., De Graef, P., & Verfaillie, K. (1997, September). Encoding of nontarget information in transsaccadic memory. Poster session presented at the 9th European Conference on Eye Movements, Ulm, Germany.
29. Lawson, R., & Humphreys, G. W. (1996). View specificity in object processing: Evidence from picture matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 395-416.
30. Matin, E. (1974). Saccadic suppression: A review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 899-917.
31. McConkie, G. W., & Currie, C. B. (1996). Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 563-581.
32. McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578-586.
33. a) neurons to "biological motion" stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 99-116.
34. Palmer, J. (1986a). Mechanisms of displacement discrimination with and without perceived movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 411-421.
35. Palmer, J. (1986b). Mechanisms of displacement discrimination with a visual reference. Vision Research, 26, 1939-1947.
36. Perrett, D. I., Harries, M. H., Benson, P. J., Chitty, A. J., & Mistlin, A. J. (1990). Retrieval of structure from rigid and biological motion: An analysis of the visual responses of neurones in the macaque temporal cortex. In A. Blake & T. Troscianko (Eds.), AI and the eye (pp. 181-200). Chichester, England: Wiley.
37. Perrett, D. I., Harries, M. H., Bevan, R., Thomas, S., Benson, P. J., Mistlin, A. J., Chitty, A. J., Hietanen, J., & Ortega, J. E. (1989). Frameworks of analysis for the neural representation of animate objects and actions. Journal of Experimental Biology, 146, 87-113.
38. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Collins, W. E. (1984). Integrating pictorial information across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 426-442.
39. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). Role of spatial location in integration of pictorial information across saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 199-210.
40. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65-81.
41. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
42. Schneider, W. X. (1995). VAM: A neuro-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition, and space-based motor action. Visual Cognition, 2, 331-376.
43. Strong, G. W., & Whitehead, B. A. (1989). A solution to the tag-assignment problem for neural networks. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 381-433.
44. Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 55-82.
45. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centered inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 43A, 289-298.
46. Van Rensbergen, J., & De Troy, A. (1993). A reference guide for the Leuven dual-PC controlled Purkinje eyetracking system (Psychological Report No. 145). Leuven, Belgium: University of Leuven, Laboratory of Experimental Psychology.
47. Verfaillie, K. (1992). Variant points of view on viewpoint invariance. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 215-235.
48. Verfaillie, K. (1993). Orientation-dependent priming effects in the perception of biological motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 992-1013.
49. Verfaillie, K. (1994). Visual perception of biological motion. In M. Richelle, V. De Keyser, G. d'Ydewalle, & A. Vandierendonck (Eds.), Temporal reasoning and behavioral variability (pp. 9-59). Liège, Belgium: University of Liège.
50. Verfaillie, K. (1997). Transsaccadic memory for the egocentric and allocentric position of a biological-motion walker. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 739-760.
51. Verfaillie, K., & Boutsen, L. (1995). A corpus of 714 full-color images of depth-rotated objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 925-961.
52. Verfaillie, K., De Troy, A., & Van Rensbergen, J. (1994). Transsaccadic integration of biological motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 649-670.
53. Volkmann, F. C. (1986). Human visual suppression. Vision Research, 26, 1401-1416.
54. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.
55. Wolfe, J. M., & Bennett, S. C. (1997). Preattentive object files: Shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Research, 37, 25-43.