Time-and-motion study on Class II copy-milled ceramic inlays

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 429-436

  Kreulen, C M ^a   Moscovich, H ^a   Dansen, K A ^a   Creugers, N H J ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Class II restorations; Clinical studies; Copy milled ceramic inlays; Efficiency; Time and motion studies

Indexed keywords

CELAY;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABORATORY; MALE; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PRODUCTIVITY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; CERAMICS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; EFFICIENCY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INLAYS; LABORATORIES, DENTAL; MALE; MOLAR; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME AND MOTION STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0034242016     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00008-7     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Eidenbenz S, Lehner CR, Schärer P. Copy milling ceramic inlays from resin analogs: a practicable approach with the CELAY system. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 1994;7:134-42.
2. Grüninger A, Burkard H, Stassinakis A, et al. Das Celay-system. Schweizerische Monatsschrift für Zahnheilkunde 1996;106:127-35.
3. Shearer AC, Thordrup M, Hörsted-Bindslev P, et al. A milled ceramic inlay/onlay system: a report from a series of cases. British Dental Journal 1998;185:283-6.
4. Moscovich H, Roeters FJM, Verdonschot N, et al. Effect of composite basing on the resistance to bulk fracture of industrial porcelain inlays. Journal of Dentistry 1998;26:183-9.
5. Moscovich H, Creugers NHJ, de Kanter RJAM, et al. Loss of sound tooth structure when replacing amalgam restorations by adhesive inlays. Operative Dentistry 1998;23:327-31.
6. Sorin S. The analysis of operative procedures related to treatment of carious lesions by amalgam restoration. Israel Journal of Dental Medicine 1974;23:27-9.
7. Tan HH, van Gemert HG. Time utilization, productivity and costs of solo and extended duty auxiliary dental practice. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1977;5:151-5.
8. Leverett DH, Handelman SL, Brenner CM, et al. Use of sealants in the prevention and early treatment of carious lesions: cost analysis. Journal of the American Dental Association 1983;106:39-42.
9. Woodward GL, Csima A, Leake JL, et al. Estimation of procedure times in a publicly funded dental programme. Community Dental Health 1995;12:155-60.
10. Plasmans PJJM, van't Hof MA. Treatment time analysis for extensive amalgam restorations. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1987;15:192-6.
11. Advokaat JGA, van 't Hof MA, Akerboom HBM, et al. Treatment times of amalgam restorations. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1992;20:200-3.
12. Hendriks FHJ, Letzel H, Vrijhoef MMA. Cost benefit analysis of direct posterior restorations. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1985;13:256-9.
13. Kreulen CM, van Amerongen WE, Akerboom HBM, et al. Evaluation of treatment times for Class II composite resin restorations. Journal of Dentistry for Children 1991;58:372-7.
14. Plasmans PJJM, van't Hof MA, Creugers NHJ. Fabrication times for indirect composite resin restorations. Journal of Dentistry 1992;20:27-32.
15. Kreulen CM, van Amerongen WE, Gruythuysen RJM, et al. Evaluation of treatment times for Class II resin composite inlays. Journal of Dentistry for Children 1992;59:333-7.
16. Antczak-Bouckoms AA, Tulloch JF, White BA, et al. Methodological considerations in the analysis of cost effectiveness in dentistry. Journal of Public Health Dentistry 1989;49:215-22.
17. Drummond MF, O'Brien B, Stoddart GL, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.