An experimental testing of anchoring effects in discrete choice questions

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 329-341

  Frykblom, P ^a,b   Shogren, Jason F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Anchoring; Contingent valuation; Experimental economics

Indexed keywords

MARKETING; VALUE ENGINEERING;

ANCHORING EFFECTS; CONTINGENT VALUATION (CV) SURVEYS; EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS; WILLINGNESS TO PAY (WTP);

INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS;

DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; METHODOLOGY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 0034233947     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008388421810     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ayer, M., H. D. Brunk, G. M. Ewing, W. T. Reid and E. Silverman (1955), 'An Empirical Distribution Function for Sampling with Incomplete Information', Annals of Mathematical Statistics 26, 641-647.
2. Boyle, K. J., R. F. Johnson, D. W. McCollum, W. H. Desvousges, R. W. Dunford and S. P. Hudson (1996), 'Valuing Public Goods: Discrete Versus Continuous Contingent Valuation Responses', Land Economics 72, 381-396.
3. Boyle, K. J., H. F. MacDonald, H. Cheng and D. W. McCollum (1998), 'Bid Design and Yea Saying in Single-bounded, Dichotomous-choice Questions', American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74, 49-64.
4. Couch, A. and K. Keniston (1960), 'Yeasayers and Naysayers: Agreeing Response Set as a Personality Variable', Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60, 151-174.
5. Cummings, R. G. and G. W. Harrison (1994), 'Was the Ohio Court Well Informed in Their Assessment of the Accuracy of the Contingent Valuation Method?', Natural Resources Journal 34(1), 1-36.
6. Cummings, R. G., G. W. Harrison and E. E. Rutström (1995), 'Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive Compatible?', American Economic Review 85, 260-266.
7. Davis, D. D. and C. A. Holt (1993), Experimental Economics, New Jersey, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8. Frykblom, P. (1997), 'Hypothetical Question Modes and Real Willingness to Pay', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 34, 275-287.
9. Green, D., K. Jacowitz, D. Kahneman and D. McFadden (1998), 'Referendum Contingent Valuation, Anchoring, and Willingness to Pay for Public Goods', Resource and Energy Economics 20, 85-116.
10. Hanemann, M. W. (1994), 'Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation', Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 19-43.
11. Herriges, J. A. and J. F. Shogren (1996), 'Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-up Questioning', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30, 112-131.
12. Hoehn, J. P. and A. Randall (1987), 'A Satisfactory Benefit Cost Indicator from Contingent Valuation', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 12, 226-247.
13. Holmes, T. P. and R. A. Kramer (1995), 'An Independent Sample Test of Yea-saying and Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous-choice Contingent Valuation', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29, 121-132.
14. Jakobsson, K. M. and A. K. Dragun (1996), Contingent Valuation and Endangered Species: Methodological Issues and Application. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
15. Kanninen, B. J. (1995), 'Bias in Discrete Choice Response Contingent Valuation', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28, 114-125.
16. Kealy, M. J. and R. W. Turner (1993), 'Testing of Equality of Contingent Valuations', American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75(2), 321-331.
17. Kmenta, J. (1986), Elements of Econometrics. London: Macmillan.
18. Kriström, B. (1993), 'Comparing Continuous and Discrete Contingent Valuation Questions', Environmental and Resource Economics 3, 63-71.
19. Li, C. Z. and Fredman, P. (1994), On Reconciliation of the Discrete Choice and Open-ended Responses in Contingent Valuation Experiments. Dissertation, Umeå Economic Studies, 341, Umeå: Umeå University.
20. Mitchell, C. Z. and R. T. Carson (1989), Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
21. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (1993), 'Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation', Federal Register 58(10), 4602-4614, January 11.
22. Neill, H. R., R. G. Cummings, P. T. Ganderton, G. W. Harrison and T. McGuckin (1994), 'Hypothetical Surveys and Real Economic Commitments', Land Economics 70(2), 145-154.
23. Ready, R. C., J. C. Buzby and D. Hu (1996), 'Differences Between Continuous and Discrete Choice Value Estimates', Land Economics 72, 397-411.
24. SAS Institute (1990), SAS/STAT User's guide, 2, Cary, NC.
25. Siegel, S. and J. N. Castellan, Jr. (1988), Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, New York: McGraw-Hill.