Hypothetical question modes and real willingness to pay

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 275-287

  Frykblom, Peter ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; QUESTION MODES; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 0031404854     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1997.1015     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ayer M., Brunk H. D., Ewing G. M., Silverman E. An empirical distribution function for sampling with incomplete information. Ann. Math. Statist. 26:1955;641-647.
2. Blackburn M., Harrison G. W., Rutström E. E. Statistical bias functions and informative hypothetical surveys. Amer. J. Agric. Econom. 76:1994;1084-1088.
3. Bohm P. CVM spells responses tohypothetical. Nat. Res. J. 34:1994;37-50.
4. Boyle K. J., Johnson R. F., McCollum D. W., Desvousges W. H., Dunford R. W., Hudson S. P. Valuing public goods: Discrete versus continuous contingent valuation responses. Land Econom. 61:1996;381-396.
5. Cummings R. G., Harrison G. W., Rutström E. E. Homegrown values and hypothetical surveys: Is the dichotomous choice approach incentive compatible? Amer. Econom. Rev. 85:1995;260-266.
6. Hanemann M. W. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. Amer. J. Agric. Econom. 66:1984;332-341.
7. Hanemann M. W. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. J. Econom. Perspectives. 8:1994;19-43.
8. Hoehn J. P., Randall A. A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation. J. Environ. Econom. Manag. 12:1987;226-247.
9. Kealy M. J., Dovidio J. F., Rochel M. L. Accuracy in valuation is a matter of degree. Land Econom. 64:1988;158-171.
10. Kealy M. J., Turner R. W. Testing of equality of contingent valuations. Amer. J. Agric. Econom. 75:1993;321-331.
11. Kmenta J. Elements of Econometrics. 1986;Macmillan, London.
12. B. Kriström, 1995, Spike models in contingent valuation: Theory and illustrations, Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå
13. B. Kriström, 1995, Practical problems in contingent valuation, Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå
14. Li C.-Z., Fredman P. On reconciliation of the discrete choice and open-ended responses in contingent valuation experiments. Umeå Econom. Studies. 341:1994.
15. Mitchell R. C., Carson R. T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. 1989;Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore. p. 97-105.
16. Federal Register. 58:1993;4602-4614.
17. Neill H. R., Cummings R. G., Ganderton P. T., Harrison G. W., McGuckin T. Hypothetical surveys and real economic commitments. Land Econom. 70:1994;145-154.
18. Seller C., Stoll J. R., Chavas J.-P. Validation of empirical measures of welfare change: A comparison of nonmarket techniques. Land Econom. 61:1985;156-175.
19. Siegel S., Castellan J. N. Jr. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 1988;McGraw-Hill, New York.