Bid design and yea saying in single-bounded, dichotomous-choice questions

Land Economics

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 49-64

  Boyle, Kevin J ^a   MacDonald, Hugh F ^b   Cheng, Hsiang Tai ^c   McCollum, Daniel W ^a  

^a Department of Environmental Economics ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^c ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001896006     PISSN: 00237639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3147212     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alberini, Anna. 1995a. Optimal Designs for Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys: Single-Bound, Double-Bound, and Bivariate Models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28 (3):287-306.
2. 1995b. "Willingness-to-Pay Models of Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Survey Data. Land Economics-11 (Feb.):83-95.
3. Bishop, Richard E., and Thomas A. Heberlein. 1979. Measuring Values of Extra-Market Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61 (5):926-30.
4. Boyle, K. J., M. P. Welsh, and R. C. Bishop. 1988. Validation of Empirical Measures of Welfare Change: Comment. Land Economics 64 (Feb.):94-99.
5. Boyle, Kevin J., F. Reed Johnson, Daniel W. McCollum, William H. Desvousges, Richard W. Dunford, and Sara P. Hudson. 1996. Valuing Public Goods: Discrete versus Continuous Contingent-Valuation Responses. Land Economics 72 (Aug.):381-96.
6. Cooper, Joseph C. 1993. Optimal Bid Selection for Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24 (1):25-40.
7. Cooper, Joseph, and John Loomis. 1992. Sensitivity of \Villingness-to-Pay Estimates to Bid Design in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Models. Land Economics 68 (May):211-24.
8. 1993. "Sensitivity of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates to Bid Design in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Models: Reply Land Economics 69 (May):203-8.
9. Desvousges, William H., F. Reed Johnson, Richard W. Dunford, Sara P. Hudson, K. Nicole Wilson, and Kevin J. Boyle. 1993. "Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability. In Contributions to Economic Analysis, ed. J. A. Hausman. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.B.
10. Duffield, J. W., and D. A. Patterson. 1991. Inference and Optimal Design for a Welfare Measure in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation. Land Economics 67 (May):22539.
11. 1992. Field Testing Existence Values: An Instream Flow Trust Fund for Montana Rivers. Paper presented at the American Economics Association annual meeting in New Orleans, Louisiana.
12. Elnagheeb, Abdelmoneim H., And Jeffrey L. Jordan. 1995. Comparing Three Approaches That Generate Bids for the Referendum Contingent Valuation Method. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29 (1):92-104.
13. Herriges, Joseph A., and Jason F. Shogren. 1996. Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-Up Questioning. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30 (1): 112-31.
14. Hoehn, J. P., and A. Randall. 1987. A Satisfactory Benefit-Cost Indicator from CV. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14 (3):226-47.
15. Kanninen, B. J. 1993a. Design of Sequential Ex-periments for Contingent Valuation Studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25 (1):S1-S11.
16. 1993b. "Optimal Experimental Design for Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation. Land Economics 69 (May): 138-46.
17. 1995. "Bias in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28 (1):114-25.
18. Kanninen, B. J., and B. Kriström. 1993. Sensitivity of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates to Bid Design in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Models: A Comment. Land Economics 69 (May): 199-202.
19. Kealy, Mary Jo, and Robert W. Turner. 1993. A Test of the Equality of Close Ended and Open Ended Contingent Valuations. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75 (2): 321-31.
20. Kriesel, W., and A. Randall. 1990. "Evaluating National Policy by Contingent Valuation. In Economic Valuation of Natural Resources: Issues, Theory, and Applications, eds. R. L. Johnson and G. V. Johnson. Boulder, CO: Westview.
21. Kriström, B. 1990. Valuing Environmental Benefits Using the Contingent Valuation Method-An Econometric Analysis. Ph.D. diss., Umeâ Economic Studies, No. 219, University of Umeâ, Sweden.
22. 1993. "Comparing Continuous and Discrete Contingent Valuation Questions. £1117'ronmental and Resource Economics 3:36-71
23. McFadden, Daniel. 1994. Contingent Valuation and Social Choice. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76 (4):689-708.
24. McFadden, Daniel, and Gregory K. Leonard. 1993. "Issues in the Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods: Methodologies for Data Collection and Analysis. In Contributions to Economic Analysis, éd. J. A. Hausman. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.B.
25. Minkin, S. 1987. Optimal Design for Binary Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82:1098-1103.
26. NOAA Contingent Valuations Panel. 1993. Natural Resource Damage Assessments Under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. Federal Register 58 (10):4601-14.
27. Nyquist H. 1990. Optimal Designs of Discrete Response Experiments in Contingent Valuation Studies. Review of Economics and Statistics 74 (3):559-63.
28. Shapiro, Benson P. 1968. The Psychology of Pricing. Harvard Business Review 46:14-25.
29. Teisl, Mario, Kevin J. Boyle, Daniel McCollum, and Stephen D. Reiling. 1995. Test-Retest Reliability of Contingent Valuation with Independent Sample Pretest and Post-Test Control Groups. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77:613-19.
30. Wu, C. F. J. 1988. "Optimal Design for Percentile Estimation of a Quanta! Response Curve. In Optimal Design and Analysis of Experiments, eds. Y. Dodge, V. V. Fedorov, and H. P. Wynn. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.