Intrinsic bias and lineage restriction in the phenotype determination of dopamine and neuropeptide Y amacrine cells

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 3244-3253

  Moody, Sally A ^a   Chow, Ida ^b   Huang, Sen ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell fate determination; Eye fields; Neural plate; Retina; Serotonin; Xenopus

Indexed keywords

NEUROPEPTIDE Y; NEUROTRANSMITTER; SEROTONIN;

ARTICLE; BLASTOMERE; CELL DIVISION; CELL FATE; CELL LINEAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPAMINERGIC NERVE CELL; EMBRYO; NEUROECTODERM; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; RETINA AMACRINE CELL; STEM CELL; XENOPUS;

EID: 0034193530     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.20-09-03244.2000     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Adelmann HB (1937) Experimental studies on the development of the eye. IV. The effect of partial and complete excision of the prechordal substrata on the development of the eyes of Ambystoma punctatum. J Exp Zool 75:199-227.
2. Adler R, Belecky-Adams T (1999) Cell fate determination in the chick embryo retina. In: Cell lineage and fate determination (Moody SA, ed), pp 463-474. New York: Academic.
3. Alexiades MR, Cepko CL (1997) Subsets of retinal progenitors display temporally regulated and distinct biases in the fates of their progeny. Development 124:1119-1131.
4. Austin CP, Feldman DE, Ida JA, Cepko CL (1995) Vertebrate retinal ganglion cells are selected from competent progenitors by the action of Notch. Development 121:3637-3650.
5. Bauer DV, Huang S, Moody SA (1994) The cleavage stage origin of Spemann's Organizer: analysis of the movements of blastomere clones before and after gastrulation in Xenopus. Development 120:1179-1189.
6. Belliveau MJ, Cepko CL (1999) Extrinsic and intrinsic factors control the genesis of amacrine and cone cells in the rat retina. Development 26:555-566.
7. Cepko CL (1999) The roles of intrinsic and extrinsic cues and bHLH genes in the determination of retinal cell fates. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:37-46.
8. Chitnis AB (1999) Control of neurogenesis-lessons from frogs, fish and flies. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:18-25.
9. Dorsky RI, Chang WS, Rapaport DH, Harris WA (1997) Regulation of neuronal diversity in the Xenopus retina by Delta signaling. Nature 385:67-70.
10. Eagleson GW, Harris WA (1990) Mapping of the presumptive brain regions in the neural plate of Xenopus laevis. J Neurobiol 21:427-440.
11. Fekete DM, Perez-Miguelsanz J, Ryder EF, Cepko CL (1994) Clonal analysis in the chicken retina reveals tangential dispersion of clonally related cells. Dev Biol 166:666-682.
12. Hajnal A (1999) Cell fate determination and signal transduction during Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development. In: Cell lineage and fate determination (Moody SA, ed), pp 157-170. New York: Academic.
13. Harris WA (1997) Cellular diversity in the vertebrate retina. Curr Opin Genet Dev 7:651-658.
14. Harris WA, Hartenstein V (1991) Neuronal determination without cell division in Xenopus embryos. Neuron 6:499-515.
15. Hartenstein V (1989) Early neurogenesis in Xenopus: the spatio-temporal pattern of proliferation and cell lineages in the embryonic spinal cord. Neuron 3:399-411.
16. Holt CE, Bertsch TW, Ellis HM, Harris WA (1988) Cellular determination in the Xenopus retina is independent of lineage and birth date. Neuron 1:15-26.
17. Huang S, Moody SA (1992) Does lineage determine the dopamine phenotype in the tadpole hypothalamus: a quantitative analysis. J Neurosci 12:1351-1362.
18. Huang S, Moody SA (1993) The retinal fate of Xenopus cleavage stage progenitors is dependent upon blastomere position and competence: studies of normal and regulated clones. J Neurosci 13:3193-3210.
19. Huang S, Moody SA (1995) Asymmetrical blastomere origin and spatial domains of dopamine and neuropeptide Y amacrine subtypes in Xenopus tadpole retinas. J Comp Neurol 360:2-13.
20. Huang S, Moody SA (1997) Three types of serotonin-containing amacrine cells in tadpole retina have distinct clonal origins. J Comp Neurol 387:42-52.
21. Huang S, Moody SA (1998) Dual expression of GABA or serotonin and dopamine in Xenopus amacrine cells is transient and may be regulated by laminar cues. Vis Neurosci 15:969-977.
22. Jacobson M (1968) Cessation of DNA synthesis in retinal ganglion cells correlated with the time of specification of their central connections. Dev Biol 17:219-232.
23. Jacobson M, Hirose G (1978) Origin of the retina from both sides of the embryonic brain: a contribution to the problem of crossing at the optic chiasma. Science 202:637-639.
24. Jacobson M, Hirose G (1981) Clonal organization of the central nervous system of the frog. II. Clones stemming from individual blastomeres of the 32- and 64-cell stages. J Neurosci 1:271-284.
25. Jensen AM, Raff MC (1997) Continuous observation of multipotential retinal progenitor cells in clonal density culture. Dev Biol 188:267-279.
26. Klein SL (1987) The first cleavage furrow demarcates the dorsal-ventral axis in Xenopus embryos. Dev Biol 120:299-304.
27. Lillien L, Cepko CL (1992) Control of proliferation in the retina: temporal changes in responsiveness to FGF and TGF alpha. Development 115:253-266.
28. MacNeil MA, Masland RH (1998) Extreme diversity among amacrine cells: implications for function. Neuron 20:971-982.
29. Marrow EM, Belliveau MJ, Cepko CL (1998) Two phases of rod photoreceptor differentiation during rat retinal development. J Neurosci 18:3738-3748.
30. Marrow EM, Furukawa T, Lee JE, Cepko CL (1999) NeuroD regulates cell fate determination in the developing neural retina. Development 126:23-26.
31. Masho R (1990) Close correlation between the first cleavage plane and the body axis in early Xenopus embryos. Dev Growth Differ 32:57-64.
32. Moody SA (1987a) Fates of the blastomeres of the 16-cell Xenopus embryo. Dev Biol 119:560-578.
33. Moody SA (1987b) Fates of the blastomeres of the 32-cell Xenopus embryo. Dev Biol 122:300-319.
34. Moody SA (1999a) Cell lineage and fate determination. New York: Academic.
35. Moody SA (1999b) Testing the cell fate commitment of single blastomeres in Xenopus laevis. In: Advances in molecular biology: a comparative methods approach to the study of oocytes and embryos (Richter J, ed), pp 355-381. New York: Oxford UP.
36. Moody SA, Bauer DV, Hainski AM, Huang S (1996) Determination of Xenopus cell lineage by maternal factors and cell interactions. Curr Top Dev Biol 32:103-138.
37. Moore KB, Moody SA (1999) Animal-vegetal asymmetries influence the earliest steps in retinal fate commitment in Xenopus. Dev Biol 212:25-41.
38. Newport J, Kirschner M (1982) A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos. II. Control of the onset of transcription. Cell 30:687-696.
39. Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J (1994) Normal table of Xenopus (Daudin). New York: Garland.
40. Perron M, Harris WA (1999) Cellular determination in amphibian retina. In: Cell lineage and fate determination (Moody SA, ed), pp 353-368. New York: Academic.
41. Reese BE, Tan SS (1998) Clonal boundary analysis in the developing retina using X-inactivation transgenic mosaic mice. Semin Cell Dev Biol 9:285-292.
42. Reh TA (1992) Cellular interactions determine neuronal phenotypes in rodent retinal cultures. J Neurobiol 23:1067-1083.
43. Reh TA, Levine EM (1998) Multipotential stem cells and progenitors in the vertebrate retina. J Neurobiol 36:206-220.
44. Reh TA, Tully T (1986) Regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase-containing amacrine cell number in the larval frog retina. Dev Biol 114:463-469.
45. Saha MS, Grainger RM (1992) A labile period in the determination of the anterior-posterior axis during early neural development in Xenopus. Neuron 8:1003 -1014.
46. Siegfried E (1999) Role of Drosophila wingless signaling in cell fate determination. In: Cell lineage and fate determination (Moody SA, ed), pp 249-271. New York: Academic.
47. Spemann H (1938) Embryonic development and induction. New Haven, CN: Yale UP.
48. Turner DL, Snyder EY, Cepko CL (1990) Lineage-independent determination of cell type in the embryonic mouse retina. Neuron 4:833-845.
49. Waid DK, McLoon SC (1995) Immediate differentiation of ganglion cells following mitosis in the developing retina. Neuron 14:117-124.
50. Waid DK, McLoon SC (1998) Ganglion cells influence the fate of dividing retinal cells in culture. Development 125:1059-1066.
51. Watanabe T, Raff MC (1990) Rod photoreceptor development in vitro: intrinsic properties of proliferating neuroepithelial cells change as development proceeds in the rat retina. Neuron 2:461-467.
52. Wetts R, Fraser SE (1988) Multipotent precursors can give rise to all major cell types of the frog retina. Science 239:1142-1145.
53. Wetts R, Fraser SE (1989) Slow intermixing of cells during Xenopus embryogenesis contributes to the consistency of the blastomere fate map. Development 105:9-15.
54. Wetts R, Serbedzija GN, Fraser SE (1989) Cell lineage analysis reveals multipotent precursors in the ciliary margin of the frog retina. Dev Biol 136:254-263.
55. Williams RW, Goldowitz D (1992a) Structure of clonal and polyclonal cell arrays in chimeric mouse retina. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:1184-1188.
56. Williams RW, Goldowitz D (1992b) Lineage versus environment in embryonic retina: a revisionist perspective. Trends Neurosci 15:368-373.