The contextual change paradox is still unresolved: Comment on Bouton, Nelson, and Rosas (1999)

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 125, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 187-189

  Riccio, David C ^b   Richardson, Rick ^a   Ebner, Debbie L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; HUMAN; MEMORY; NOTE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; MEMORY;

EID: 0033088604     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.187     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Bouton, M. E., Nelson, J. B., Rosas, J. M. (1999). Stimulus generalization, context change, and forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 171-186.
2. Miller, R. R., Kasprow, W. J., & Schachtman, T. R. (1986). Retrieval variability: Sources and consequences. American Journal of Psychology, 99, 145-218.
3. Riccio, D. C., Ackil, J., & Burch-Vernon, A. (1992). Forgetting of stimulus attributes: Methodological implications for assessing associative phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 433-445.
4. Riccio, D. C., & Ebner, D. L. (1981). Postacquisition modifications of memory. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.). Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 291-317). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Riccio, D. C., Rabinowitz, V. C., & Axelrod, S. (1994). Memory: When less is more. American Psychologist, 49, 917-926.
6. Riccio, D. C., & Richardson, R. (1984). The status of memory following experimentally induced amnesia: Gone but not forgotten. Physiological Psychology, 12, 152-165.
7. Riccio, D. C., Richardson, R., & Ebner, D. L. (1984). Memory retrieval deficits based upon altered contextual cues: A paradox. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 152-165.
8. Rosas, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (1997). Additivity of the effects of retention interval and context change on latent inhibition: Toward resolution of the context forgetting paradox. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 283-294.
9. Spear, N. E. (1973). Retrieval of memory in animals. Psychological Review, 80, 163-194.
10. Spear, N. E., & Parsons, P. (1976). Analysis of a reactivation treatment: Ontogeny and alleviated forgetting. In D. L. Medin, W. A. Roberts, & R. T. Davis (Eds.), Processes of animal memory (pp. 135-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Spear, N. E., & Riccio, D. C. (1994). Memory: Phenomena and principles. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
12. Thomas, D. R., & Empedocles, S. (1992). Novelty versus retrieval cue value in the study of long-term memory in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 22-33.
13. Zhou, Y. L., & Riccio, D. C. (1994). Pretest cuing can alleviate the forgetting of contextual stimulus attributes. Learning and Motivation, 12, 233-244.
14. Zhou, Y. L., & Riccio, D. C. (1996). Manipulation of components of context: The context shift effect and forgetting of stimulus attributes. Learning and Motivation, 27, 400-407.