More than lip service: Facial esthetics in orthodontics

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 130, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 1173-1181

  Bowman, S Jay ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL CARE; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTICS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; REVIEW; TOOTH EXTRACTION; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ESTHETICS, DENTAL; HUMANS; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; TOOTH EXTRACTION;

EID: 0033175084     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0371     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Angle EH. The treatment of malocclusion of the teeth. 7th ed. Philadelphia: SS White; 1907:64.
2. Witzig JW, Spahl TJ. The clinical management of basic maxillofacial orthopedic appliances. In: Mechanics. Vol. 1. Littleton, Mass.: PSG Publishing; 1987:10-3.
3. Stoner CC. An interview: AAFO's man of the year 1984, Dr. John W. Witzig. Funct Orthod 1984;1(4):9-15.
4. Broadbent JM. Facing malocclusion: achieving harmony and balance. Dent Today 1990;9(6):41-5.
5. Bowbeer GR. Saving the face and the TMJ: part 2. Funct Orthod 1986;3(2):9-13,15,17.
6. Bowbeer GR. The sixth key to facial beauty and TMJ health. Funct Orthod 1987;4(4):4-20.
7. Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Brown C, Kowalski CJ. The prevalence of orthodontic extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:462-6.
8. Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jacobsen JR, Zaher AR. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes to Class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:28-37.
9. Gianelly AA. Extraction versus nonextraction. In: Holender CJ, Bounoure GM, Barat Y, eds. Extraction versus nonextraction. Paris: SID Publisher; 1995:173-84.
10. Drobocky OB, Smith RJ. Changes in facial profile during orthodontic treatment with extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95:220-30.
11. Bravo LA. Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted. Angle Orthod 1994;64:31-42.
12. Young TM, Smith RJ. Effects of orthodontics on the facial profile: a comparison of change during nonextraction and four premolar extraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:452-8.
13. Rushing SE, Silberman SL, Meydrech EF, Tuncay OC. How dentists perceive the effects of orthodontic extraction on facial appearance. JADA 1995;126:769-72.
14. Kerns LL, Silveira AM, Kerns DG, Regennitter FJ. Esthetic preference of the frontal and profile views of the same smile. J Esthet Dent 1997;9:76-85.
15. Lines PA, Lines RR, Lines CA. Profilemetrics and facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 1978;73:648-57.
16. Prahl-Anderson B, Boersma H, van der Linden FP, Moore AW. Perceptions of dentofacial morphology by laypersons, general dentists, and orthodontists. JADA 1979;98:209-12.
17. Kerr WJ, O'Donnell JM. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod 1990;17:299-304.
18. Peck S, Peck L. Selected aspects of the art and science of facial esthetics. Semin Orthod 1995;1:105-26.
19. Johnson DK, Smith RJ. Smile esthetics after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction of four first premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:162-7.
20. Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR. Profile changes in patients treated with and without extractions: assessments by lay people. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:639-44.
21. Cochrane SM, Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP. Perceptions of facial appearance by orthodontists and the general public. J Clin Orthod 1997;31:164-8.
22. Oynick CA. The impact of orthodontic treatment on perceived facial esthetics (master's thesis). St. Louis: Saint Louis University; 1988.
23. Bowman SJ, Johnston LE Jr. The esthetic impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on Caucasian patients. Angle Orthod (in press).
24. Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston LE Jr. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:1-14.
25. Luppanapornlarp S, Johnston LE Jr. The effects of premolar-extraction treatment: a long-term comparison of outcomes in "clear-cut" extraction and nonextraction Class II patients. Angle Orthod 1993;63:257-72.
26. Johnston LE Jr., Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Cassidy DW, McCray JF, Killiany DM. The reduction of susceptibility bias in retrospective comparisions of alternative treatment strategies. In: Vig KD, Vig PS, eds. Clinical research as the basis of clinical practice. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan; 1991:155-77. Craniofacial Growth Series 25.
27. Beattie JR, Paquette DE, Johnston LE Jr. The functional impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments: a long-term comparison in patients with "borderline," equally susceptible class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:444-9.
28. James RD. A comparative study of facial profiles in extraction and nonextraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:265-76.
29. Scott SH, Johnston LE Jr. The esthetic impact of extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment on matched samples of African American patients. Angle Orthod (in press).
30. Hagler BL, Lupini J, Johnston LE Jr. Long-term comparison of extraction and nonextraction alternatives in matched samples of African American patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:393-403.
31. Caplan MJ, Shivapuja PK. The effect of premolar extractions on the soft-tissue profile in adult African American females. Angle Orthod 1997;67:129-36.
32. Boley JC. Extraction versus nonextraction: has the pendulum swung too far? Pacific Coast Soc Orthod Bull 1991;63:58-9.
33. Boley JC. Face quiz study. Presented at: Southern Component of the Pacific Coast Society of Orthodontists, June 14, 1991; Los Angeles.
34. Boley JC. Face quiz study. Presented at: 92nd Annual Session of the American Association of Orthodontists, May 11, 1992; St. Louis.
35. Rossouw PE. A longitudinal study of the stability of the dentition following orthodontic treatment (dissertation). Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa: University of Stellenbosch; 1992.
36. Sandusky WC. A long term postretention study of Tweed extraction treatment (master's thesis). Memphis, Term.: University of Tennessee, Memphis; 1983.
37. Franklin GS, Rossouw PE, Woodside DG. A longitudinal study of dental and skeletal parameters associated with stability of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:452-3.
38. Little RM, Wallen TR, Riedel RA. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment: first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1981;80:349-65.
39. Dierkes JM. The beauty of the face: an orthodontic perspective. JADA 1987;89(special issue):89E-95E.
40. Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod 1970;57:132-44.
41. Rigsbee OH III, Sperry TP, BeGole EA. The influence of facial animation on smile characteristics. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1988;3:233-9.
42. Gianelly AA, Arena SA, Bernstein L. A comparison of Class II treatment changes noted with the light wire, edgewise, and Fränkel appliances. Am J Orthod 1984;86:269-76.
43. Adenwalla ST, Kronman JA. Class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and edgewise appliances: a comparative study of mandibular growth and facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 1985;55:281-98.
44. Righellis EG. Treatment effects of Fränkel, activator and extraoral traction appliances. Angle Orthod 1983;53:107-21.
45. Johnston LE Jr. A comparative analysis of Class II treatment methods. In: McNamara JA Jr, Carlson DS, Vig PS, Ribbens KA, eds. Science and clinical judgment in orthodontics. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, 1986:103-48. Craniofacial Growth Series 19.
46. Livieratos FA, Johnston LE Jr. A comparison of one-stage and two-stage nonextraction alternatives in matched Class II samples. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:118-31.
47. Ghafari JG. Comparisons of extraoral traction and functional appliance therapy. Presented at: 97th Annual Session of the American Association of Orthodontists, May 3, 1997; Philadelphia.
48. Little RM, Riedel RA, Stein A. Mandibular arch length increase during the mixed dentition: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97:393-404.
49. Schwarze CW. Expansion and relapse in long follow-up studies. Trans Eur Orthod Soc 1972:263-74.
50. Dale JG. Interceptive guidance of occlusion with emphasis on diagnosis. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, eds. Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques. St. Louis: Mosby; 1994:291-377.
51. Lutz HD, Poulton DR. Stability of dental arch expansion in the deciduous dentition. Angle Orthod 1985;55:299-315.
52. Bruno EC. Evaluation of post-retention mandibular arch dimensions following expansion in the deciduous or early mixed dentition (master's thesis). San Francisco: University of the Pacific; 1990.
53. Peak JD. Cuspid stability. Am J Orthod 1956;42:608-41.
54. Bishara SE, Chadha JM, Potter RB. Stability of intercanine width, overbite, and overjet correction. Am J Orthod 1973;63:588-95.
55. Shapiro PA. Mandibular dental arch form and dimension: treatment and postretention changes. Am J Orthod 1974;66:58-70.
56. Kuftinec MM, Stem D. Effect of edgewise treatment and retention on mandibular incisors. Am J Orthod 1975;68:316-22.
57. El-Mangoury NH. Orthodontic relapse in subjects with varying degrees of anteroposterior and vertical dysplasia. Am J Orthod 1979;75:548-61.
58. Sondhi A, Cleall JF, BeGole EA. Dimensional changes in the arches of orthodontically treated cases. Am J Orthod 1980;77:60-74.
59. Uhde MD, Sadowsky C, BeGole EA. Long-term stability of dental relationships after orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1983;53:240-52.
60. Glenn G, Sinclair PM, Alexander RG. Non-extraction orthodontic therapy: posttreatment dental and skeletal stability. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:321-8.
61. Geran RE. Long-term stability of rapid maxillary expansion in the mixed dentition (master's thesis). Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan; 1998.
62. Burke SP, Silveira AM, Goldsmith LJ, Yancey JM, Van Stewart A, Scarfe WC. A meta-analysis of mandibular intercanine width in treatment and postretention. Angle Orthod 1998;68:53-60.
63. Proffit WR, Ackerman JL. Orthodontic treatment planning: From problem list to specific plan. In: Proffit WR, Fields HW, eds. Contemporary orthodontics. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993:186-224.
64. Artun J, Krogstad O. Periodontal status of mandibular incisors following excessive proclination: a study in adults with surgically treated mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;91:225-32.
65. Dorfman HS. Mucogingival changes resulting from mandibular incisor tooth movement. Am J Orthod 1978;74:286-97.
66. Wennström JL. Mucogingival considerations in orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 1996;2:46-52.
67. Steiner GG, Pearson JK, Ainamo J. Changes of the marginal periodontium as a result of labial tooth movement in monkeys. J Periodontol 1981;52:314-20.
68. Andlin-Sobocki A, Bodin L. Dimensional alterations of the gingiva related to changes of facial/lingual tooth position in permanent anterior teeth of children: a 2-year longitudinal study. J Clin Periodontol 1993;20:219-24.
69. Little RM. Orthodontic stability and relapse. Pacific Coast Soc Orthod Bull 1991;63:35-8.
70. Dugoni SA, Lee JS, Varela J, Dugoni AA. Early mixed dentition treatment: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod 1995;65:311-20.
71. Arnold S. Analysis of leeway space in the mixed dentition (master's thesis). Boston: Boston University; 1991.
72. Gianelly AA. Crowding: timing of treatment. Angle Orthod 1994;64:415-8.
73. Gianelly AA. Leeway space and the resolution of crowding in the mixed dentition. Semin Orthod 1995;1:118-94.
74. Gianelly AA. One-phase versus two-phase treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:556-9.
75. White LW. JCO interviews: Dr. Anthony Gianelly on current issues in orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 1996;30:439-46.
76. Bowman SJ. One-stage versus two-stage treatment: are two really necessary? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:111-6.
77. Proffit WR. Forty-year review of extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic clinic. Angle Orthod 1994;64:407-14.
78. Johnston LE Jr. Let them eat cake: the struggle between form and substance in orthodontic clinical investigation. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1:88-93.
79. Sadowsky C. The risk of orthodontic treatment for producing temporomandibular disorders: a literature overview. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:79-83.
80. Greene CS. Etiology of temporomandibular disorders. Semin Orthod 1995;1:222-8.
81. McNamara JA Jr., Seligman DA, Okeson JP. Occlusion, orthodontic treatment, and temporomandibular disorders: a review. J Orofac Pain 1995;9:73-90.
82. Luecke PE III, Johnston LE Jr. The effect of maxillary first premolar extraction and incisor retraction on mandibular position: testing the central dogma of "functional orthodontics." Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992;101:4-12.
83. Nelson G. Evidence-based orthodontics (editorial). Pacific Coast Soc Orthod Bull 1997;69:11-2.
84. Peck S. "Philosophy" and evidence-based orthodontics (editorial). Angle Orthod 1997;67:403.
85. Raphael K, Marbach JJ. Evidence-based care of musculoskeletal facial pain: implications for the clinical science of dentistry. JADA 1997;128:73-9.
86. Johnston LE Jr. A long-term comparison of extraction and nonextraction Class II therapy. Presented at: 96th Annual Session of the American Association of Orthodontists; May 11, 1992; St. Louis.
87. Johnston LE Jr. The value of information and the cost of uncertainty: who pays the bill? OERF Newsletter 1998:37;7-15.