Not to be and then to be: Visual representation of ignored unfamiliar faces

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 246-263

  Khurana, Beena ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MEMORY; RESPONSE TIME; VISION;

ADULT; CUES; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MEMORY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; REFRACTORY PERIOD, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0034133962     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.1.246     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Allman, J., & McGuinness, E. (1988). Visual cortex in primates. In H. D. Steklis & J. Erwin (Eds.), Comparative primate biology (Vol. 4, pp. 279-326). New York: Alan R. Liss.
2. Arnheim, R. (1954). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the eye. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1991). Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393-419.
4. Bruce, C. J., Desimone, R., & Gross, C. G. (1981). Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal sulcus of the macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology, 46, 369-384.
5. Bruce, V., Burton, M., Carson, D., Hanna, E., & Mason, O. (1994). Repetition priming of face recognition. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 179-200). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Bruce, V., & Langton, S. (1994). The use of pigmentation and shading information in recognizing the sex and identities of faces. Perception, 23, 803-822.
7. Bruce, V., & Young, A. W. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-327.
8. Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Johnston, R. A. (1990). Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model. British Journal of Psychology, 18, 45-60.
9. Cavanagh, P., & Leclerc, Y. G. (1989). Shape from shadows. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 3-27.
10. Cochran, E. L., Pick, A. D., & Pick, H. L. (1983). Task-specific strategies of mental "rotation" of facial representations. Memory & Cognition, 11, 41-48.
11. Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & van Hoesen, G. W. (1982). Prosopagnosia: Anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms. Neurology, 32, 331-341.
12. DeSchepper, B., & Treisman, A. (1996). Visual memory for novel shapes: Implicit coding without attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 27-47.
13. Desimone, R. (1991). Face-selective cells in the temporal cortex of monkeys. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 1-8.
14. Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80-90.
15. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
16. Driver, J., & Tipper, S. P. (1989). On the nonselectivity of "selective" seeing: Contrasts between interference and priming in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 304-314.
17. Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272-300.
18. Ellis, H. D., & Young, A. W. (1989). Are faces special? In A. W. Young & H. D. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of research on face processing (pp. 1-26). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
19. Ellis, H. D., Young, A. W., Flude, B. M., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Repetition priming of face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 193-210.
20. Farah, M. J. (1990). Visual agnosia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Fiorentini, A., Maffei, L., & Sandini, G. (1983). The role of high spatial frequencies in face perception. Perception, 12, 195-201.
22. Fox, E. (1994). Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: The role of selection difficulty. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 565-574.
23. Galper, R. E. (1970). Recognition of faces in photographic negative. Psychonomic Science, 19, 207-208.
24. Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1980). Memory for faces and schema theory. Journal of Psychology, 105, 47-59.
25. Goren, C., Sarty, M. M., & Wu, P. (1975). Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. Pediatrics, 56, 544-549.
26. Gross, C. G., Rocha-Miranda, C. E., & Bender, D. B. (1972). Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology, 35, 96-111.
27. Harmon, L. D., & Julesz, B. (1973). Masking in visual recognition: Effects of two-dimensional filtered noise. Science, 180, 1194-1197.
28. Hay, D. C., & Young, A. W. (1982). The human face. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 173-202). New York: Academic Press.
29. Hayes, A. (1988). Identification of two-tone images; some implications for high- and low-spatial-frequency processes in human vision. Perception, 17, 429-436.
30. Hayes, A. (1991). Local phase relationships of image spatial-frequency components at different spatial scales (Memo No. 9108). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: McGill University, Vision Research Centre.
31. Hayes, A., Morrone, M. C., & Burr, D. (1986). Recognition of positive and negative bandpass-filtered images. Perception, 15, 595-602.
32. Hayes, A., & Ross, J. (1995). Lines of sight. In R. Gregory, J. Harris, P. Heard, & D. Rose (Eds.), The artful eye (pp. 339-352). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
33. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process-dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
34. Johnston, A., Hill, H., & Carman, N. (1992). Recognizing faces: Effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversal. Perception, 21, 365-375.
35. Kemp, R., McManus, C., & Piggot, T. (1990). Sensitivity to the displacement of facial features in negative and inverted images. Perception, 19, 531-543.
36. Kendrick, K. M., & Baldwin, B. A. (1987). Cells in the temporal cortex of conscious sheep can respond preferentially to the sight of faces. Science, 236, 448-450.
37. Khurana, B., Smith, W. C., Baker, M. T., & Huang, C. (1994). Face representation under conditions of inattention. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 35, 4135.
38. Kleiner, K. A., & Banks, M. S. (1987). Stimulus energy does not account for 2-month-olds' face preferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 594-600.
39. Kohler, W. (1940). Dynamics in psychology. New York: Liveright.
40. Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative activity of the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Lehmkule, S., Kratz, E., Mangel, S. C., & Sherman, S. M. (1980). Spatial and temporal sensitivity of X- and Y-cells in dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology, 43, 520-541.
42. Levine, S. C. (1989). The question of faces: Special is in the brain of the beholder. In A. W. Young & H. D. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of research on face processing (pp. 37-48). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
43. Luria, S. M., & Strauss, M. S. (1978). Comparison of eye-movements over faces in photographic positives and negatives. Perception, 7, 349-358.
44. Meadows, J. C. (1974). The anatomical basis of prosopagnosia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 37, 489-501.
45. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75-78.
46. Moore, C. M. (1994). Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict: Where has all the inhibition gone? Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 133-147.
47. Morrone, M. C., Burr, D. C., & Ross, J. (1983). Added noise restores recognizability of coarse quantized images. Nature, 305, 226-228.
48. Morton, J., & Johnson, M. H. (1989). Four ways for faces to be special. In A. W. Young & H. D. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of research on face processing (pp. 49-56). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
49. Morton, J., & Johnson, M. H. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98, 164-181.
50. Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., & Behrmann, M. (1997). What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 555-604.
51. Neill, W. T. (1977). Inhibitory and facilitory processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 444-450.
52. Neill, W. T. (1991, August). Consciousness and the inhibitory control of cognition. Paper presented at the 99th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
53. Neill, W. T., Lissner, L. S., & Beck, J. L. (1990). Negative priming in same-different matching: Further evidence for a central locus of inhibition. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 398-400.
54. Neill, W. T., & Westberry, R. L. (1987). Selective attention and the suppression of cognitive noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 327-334.
55. Perrett, D. I., Mistlin, A. J., & Chitty, A. J. (1987). Visual neurons responsive to faces. Trends in Neuroscience, 10, 358-364.
56. Perrett, D. I., Mistlin, A. J., Chitty, A. J., Smith, P. A., Potter, D. D., Broennimann, R., & Harries, M. (1988). Specialized face processing and hemispheric asymmetry in man and monkey: Evidence from single unit and reaction time studies. Behaviour and Brain Research, 29, 245-258.
57. Perrett, D. I., Rolls, E. T., & Caan, W. (1982). Visual neurons responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 47, 329-342.
58. Phelps, M. T., & Roberts, W. A. (1994). Memory for pictures of upright and inverted primate faces in humans (Homo sapiens), squirrel monkeys (Samiri sciureus), and pigeons (Columba livia). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 114-125.
59. Phillips, R. J. (1972). Why are faces hard to recognize in photographic negative? Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 425-426.
60. Rhodes, G., Brake, S., & Atkinson, A. (1993). What's lost in inverted faces? Cognition, 47, 25-57.
61. Rock, I. (1973). Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.
62. Rock, I. (1974). The perception of disoriented figures. Scientific American, 230, 78-85.
63. Rock, I., & Gutman, D. (1981). The effect of inattention on form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 275-285.
64. Rolls, E. T., & Baylis, G. C. (1986). Size and contrast have only small effects on the responses to faces of neurons in the cortex of the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey. Experimental Brain Research, 65, 38-48.
65. Rolls, E. T., Baylis, G. C., Hasselmo, M. E., & Nalwa, V. (1989). The effect of learning on the face-selective responses of neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey. Experimental Brain Research, 76, 153-164.
66. Rolls, E. T., Baylis, G. C., & Leonard, C. M. (1985). Role of low and high spatial frequencies in the face-selective responses of neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey. Vision Research, 25, 1021-1035.
67. Rolls, E. T., Tovee, M. J., & Ramachandran, V. S. (1993). Visual learning reflected in the responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the macaque. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 19, 1910.
68. Sackett, G. P. (1966). Monkeys reared in isolation with pictures as visual input: Evidence for innate releasing mechanism. Science, 154, 1470-1473.
69. Scapinello, K. F., & Yarmey, A. D. (1970). The role of familiarity and orientation in immediate and delayed recognition stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 21, 329-330.
70. Schacter, D. L., Chiu, C. Y. P., & Ochsner, K. N. (1993). Implicit memory: A selective review. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 16, 159-182.
71. Sekular, R., & Blake, R. (1994). Perception. New York: McGraw-Hill.
72. Sergent, J. (1989). Structural processing of faces. In A. W. Young & H. D. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of research on face processing (pp. 57-92). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
73. Shapley, R., & Gordon, J. (1985). Nonlinearity in the perception of form. Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 84-88.
74. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-245.
75. Thompson, P. (1980). Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion. Perception, 9, 483-484.
76. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
77. Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C., & Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 492-504.
78. Tipper, S. P., & Cranston, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 591-611.
79. Tipper, S. P., & Driver, J. (1988). Negative priming between pictures and words: Evidence for semantic analysis of ignored stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 16, 64-70.
80. Tipper, S. P., MacQueen, G. M., & Brehaut, J. C. (1988). Negative priming between response modalities: Evidence for the central locus of inhibition in selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 45-52.
81. Tipper, S. P., & Milliken, B. (1996). Distinguishing between inhibition and episodic retrieval based accounts of negative priming. In A. F. Kramer, M. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 337-363). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
82. Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., & Houghton, G. (1994). Behavioural goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 809-840.
83. Treisman, A., & DeSchepper, B. (1996). Object tokens, attention, and visual memory. In T. Inui & J. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 15-46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
84. Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247, 301-305.
85. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986). The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. Acta Psychologica, 61, 259-273.
86. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1988). Mental rotation of faces. Memory & Cognition, 16, 556-566.
87. Whiteley, A. M., & Warrington, E. K. (1977). Prosopagnosia: A clinical, psychological, and anatomical study of three patients. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 40, 394-403.
88. Yarmey, A. D. (1971). Recognition memory for familiar "public" faces: Effects of orientation and delay. Psychonomic Science, 24, 286-288.
89. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.
90. Yin, R. K. (1970). Face recognition by brain-injured patients: A dissociable ability? Neuropsychologia, 8, 395-402.
91. Young, A. W., & Bruce, V. (1991). Perceptual categories and the computation of "Grandmother." European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 38, 109-144.
92. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configural information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747-759.
93. Zhang, X., Treisman, A., & Kulczycki, A. (1996). Negative priming for novel shapes is specific to the instance presented. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 37, 2434.