Score comparability of a state mathematics assessment across students with and without reading accommodations

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 21-29

  Pomplun, Mark ^a   Omar, Md Hafidz ^b  

^a Measurement and Research Services   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; FEMALE; HANDICAPPED CHILD; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE TEST; LEARNING DISORDER; MALE; MATHEMATICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; READING; REPRODUCIBILITY;

CHILD; DISABLED CHILDREN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE TESTS; LEARNING DISORDERS; MALE; MATHEMATICS; READING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0034131542     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.21     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anatasia, A. (1970). On the formation of psychological traits. American Psychologist, 25, 899-910.
2. Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
3. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
4. Kansas State Board of Education. (1993). Kansas mathematics curriculum standards. Topeka, KS: Author.
5. Kansas State Board of Education. (1996). State regulations for special education. Topeka, KS: Author.
6. Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1984). A meta-analysis of the validity of Wechsler scale profiles and recategorizations: Patterns or parodies? Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 136-156.
7. Kishton, J. M., & Widaman, K. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representativeness parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757-765.
8. Level of inclusion in testing all over the map. (1994). Special Education Report, 20(4), 1-3.
9. Marsh, H. W. (1994). Confirmatory factor analysis models of factorial invariance: A multifaceted approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 5-34.
10. McDonald, R. P.. & Marsh, H. W. (1990). Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247-255.
11. McMahon, R. C., & Kunce, J. T. (1981). A companion of the factor structure of the WISC and WISC-R in normal and exceptional groups. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 408-410.
12. Messick, S. (1994). Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
13. Mislevy, R. J. (1985). Recent developments in the factor analysis of categorical variables. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
14. Naglieri, J. A. (1981). Factor structure of the WISC-R for children identified as learning disabled. Psychological Reports, 49, 891-895.
15. National Center on Educational Outcomes. (1993). Testing accommodations for students with disabilities. Minneapolis, MN: Author.
16. Olson, J. F., & Goldstein, A. A. (1997, April). The inclusion of students with disabilities and limited English proficient students in large-scale assessments: A summary of recent progress. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
17. Phillips, S. E. (1993). Testing condition accommodations for disabled students. Education Law Reporter, 80, 9-32.
18. Phillips, S. E. (1994). High-stakes testing accommodations: Validity versus disabled rights. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 93.
19. Poggio, J., Glasnapp, D., Pomplun, M., & Capps, L. (1996). 1996 Kansas Mathematics Assessment: Examiner's manual for all grades. Lawrence: Center for Educational Testing and Evaluation, University of Kansas.
20. Pomplun, M. (1996). Cooperative groups: Alternative assessment for students with disabilities? Journal of Special Education, 30, 1-18.
21. Pomplun, M. (1997). When students with disabilities participate in cooperative groups. Exceptional Children, 64, 49-58.
22. Pomplun, M., Glasnapp, D., Poggio, J., & Omar, M. H. (1996). Technical manual for the 1996 Kansas assessments. Lawrence: Center for Educational Testing and Evaluation, University of Kansas.
23. Pomplun, M., & Omar, M. H. (1997). Multiple mark items: An alternative objective item format? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 949-962.
24. Rock, D., Bennett, R. E., & Jirele, T. (1986). The internal construct validity of the GRE general test across handicapped and nonhandicapped populations. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
25. Rock, D. A., Bennett, R. E., & Kaplan, B. A. (1985). The internal construct validity of the SAT across handicapped and nonhandicapped populations. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
26. Sattler, J. M. (1992). Assessment of children. San Diego, CA: Author.
27. Schooler, D. L., Beebe, M. C.. & Koepke, T. (1978). Factor analysis of WISC-R scores for children identified as learning disabled, educable mentally impaired and emotionally impaired. Psychology in the Schools, 15, 478-485.
28. Sutter, E. G., & Bishop, P. C. (1986). Factor structure of the WISC-R and ITPA for learning disabled, emotionally disturbed, and control children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 975-978.
29. Tindal, G., Heath, B., Hollenbeck, K., Almond, P., & Harniss, M. (1997, April). Accommodating students with disabilities on large-scale tests: An empirical study of student response and test administration demands. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
30. Tippets, E., & Michaels, H. (1997, April). Factor structure invariance of accommodated and non-accommodated performance assessments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
31. Wang, M. W., & Stanley, J. C. (1985), Differential weighting: A review of methods and empirical studies. Review of Educational Research, 40, 663-705.
32. Wiley, D. E. (1990). Test validity and invalidity reconsidered. In R. Snow & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), Improving inquiry in social science (pp. 75-107). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Willingham, W. W., Ragosta, M., Bennett, R. E., Braun, H., Rock, D. A., & Powers, D. E. (1988). Testing handicapped people. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.