Absence of conspecific pollen advantage in the dynamics of an Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) hybrid zone

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 87, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 819-824

  Alarcón, Ruben ^a   Campbell, Diane R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Gene flow; Hybrid zone; Hybridization; Interspecific pollen competition; Ipomopsis; Male fitness; Polemoniaceae; Pollen interactions; Reproductive isolation

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ANGIOSPERM; FERTILIZATION; HOMOZYGOSITY; HYBRID ZONE; ISOENZYME; POLLEN; STIGMA; UNITED STATES;

FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); HYBRID ZONE; POLLEN;

IPOMOPSIS;

EID: 0034095824     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2656889     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ARNOLD, M. L. 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
2. _, M. L., J. L. HAMRICK, AND B. D. BENNETT. 1993. Interspecific pollen competition and reproductive isolation in Iris. Journal of Heredity 84: 13-16.
3. BURKE, J. M., S. E. CARNEY, AND M. L. ARNOLD. 1998. Hybrid fitness in the Louisiana Irises: analysis of parental and F1 performance. Evolution 52: 37-43.
4. CAMPBELL, D. R. 1992. Variation in sex allocation and floral morphology in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 79: 516-521.
5. _. 1998. Multiple paternity in fruits of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 1022-1027.
6. _, AND J. L. DOOLEY. 1992. The spatial scale of genetic differentiation in a hummingbird-pollinated plant: comparison with models of isolation by distance. American Naturalist 139: 735-748.
7. _, AND K. J. HALAMA. 1993. Resource and pollen limitations to lifetime seed production in a natural plant population. Ecology 74: 1043-1051.
8. _, N. M. WASER, AND E. J. MELÉNDEZ-ACKERMAN. 1997. Analyzing pollinator mediated selection in a plant hybrid zone: hummingbird visitation patterns on three spatial scales. American Naturalist 149: 295-315
9. _, _, AND P. G. WOLF. 1998. Pollen transfer by natural hybrids and parental species in an Ipomopsis hybrid zone. Evolution 52: 1602-1611.
10. CARNEY, S. E., M. B. CRUZAN, AND M. L. ARNOLD. 1994. Reproductive interactions between hybridizing irises: analysis of pollen tube growth and fertilization success. American Journal of Botany 81: 1169-1175.
11. _, S. A. HODGES, AND M. L. ARNOLD. 1996. Effects of differential pollen tube growth on hybridization in the Louisiana Irises. Evolution 50: 1871-1878.
12. CRUZAN, M. B. 1990. Pollen-pollen and pollen-stylar interactions during pollen tube growth in Erythonium grandifolium (Liliaceae). American Journal of Botany 77:116-122.
13. DARWIN, C. 1859. On the origin of species. John Murray, London, UK.
14. ELLSTRAND, N. C., R. WHITKUS, AND L. H. RIESEBERG. 1996. Distribution of spontaneous plant hybrids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93: 5090-5093.
15. EMMS, S. K., S. A. HODGES, AND M. L. ARNOLD. 1996. Pollen tube competition, siring success, and consistent asymmetric hybridization in Louisiana Irises. Evolution 50: 2201-2206.
16. GRANT, V., AND D. H. WILKEN. 1988. Natural hybridization between Ipomopsis aggregata and I. tenuituba (Polemoniaceae). Botanical Gazette 149: 213-221.
17. HARRISON, R. G. [ED.]. 1993. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
18. HAUSER, T. P., R. B. JORGENSEN, AND H. OSTERGÅRD. 1997. Preferential exclusion of hybrids in mixed pollinations between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and weedy B. campestris (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 756-762.
19. KLIPS, R. A. 1999. Pollen competition as a reproductive isolating mechanism between two sympatric Hibiscus species (Malvaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 269-272.
20. KNOBLOCH, I. W. 1972. Intergeneric hybridization in flowering plants. Taxon 21: 97-103.
21. KÖLREUTER, J. G. 1763. Vortsetzung der Vorläufigen Nachricht von einigen das Geschlecht der Pflanzen betreffenden Versuchen und Beobachtungen. Gleditshischen Handlung, Leipzig, Germany.
22. LEEBENS-MACK, J., AND B. G. MILLIGAN. 1998. Pollination biology in hybridizing Baptisia (Fabaceae) populations. American Journal of Botany 85: 500-507.
23. MATHER, K. 1947. Species crosses in Antirrhinum. I. Genetic isolation of species majus glutinosum and orontium. Heredity 1: 175-186.
24. MELÉNDEZ-ACKERMAN, E. J. 1997. Patterns of color and nectar variation across an Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) hybrid zone. American Journal of Botany 84: 41-47.
25. _, AND D. R. CAMPBELL. 1998. Adaptive significance of flower color and inter-trait correlations in an Ipomopsis hybrid zone. Evolution 52: 1293-1303.
26. RIESEBERG, L. H., A. M. DESROCHERS, AND S. J. YOUN. 1995. Interspecific pollen competition as a reproductive barrier between sympatric species of Helianthus (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 515-519.
27. SAS. 1996. SAS system for windows, release 6.12. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA
28. THOMSON, J. D. 1989. Germination schedules of pollen grains: implications for pollen selection. Evolution 43:220-223
29. WASER, M. M., AND M. V. PRICE. 1991. Reproductive costs of self-pollination in Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae): are ovules usurped? American Journal of Botany 78: 1036-1043.
30. WILSON, H. D., AND J. S. PAYNE. 1994. Crop / weed microgametophyte competition in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). American Journal of Botany 81: 1531-1537.