Analysis of knowledge-based protein-ligand potentials using a self- consistent method

Protein Science

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 765-775

  Shimada, J ^a   Ishchenko, A V ^a   Shakhnovich, E I ^a,b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational ligand design; Knowledge based potentials; Protein ligand interactions; Self consistent method

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPLEX FORMATION; ENERGY TRANSFER; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

EID: 0034092711     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.9.4.765     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ajay, Murcko MA. 1995. Computational methods to predict binding free energy in ligand-receptor complexes. J Med Chem 38:4953-4967.
2. Babine RE, Bender SL. 1997. Molecular recognition of protein-ligand complexes: Applications to drug design. Chem Rev 97:1359-1472.
3. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJB, Meyer EF Jr, Brice MD, Rodgers JR, Kennard O, Shimanouchi T, Tasumi M. 1997. The Protein Data Bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 112:535-542.
4. Betancourt MR, Thirumalai D. 1999. Pair potentials for protein folding: Choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes. Protein Sci 8:361-369.
5. Binder K, Heerman DW. 1992. Monte Carlo simulations in statistical physics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
6. Böhm H. 1994. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 8:243-256.
7. Böhm H. 1998. Prediction of binding constants of protein ligands: A fast method for the prioritization of hits obtained from de novo design or 3D database search programs. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 12:309-323.
8. Boriack-Sjodin PA, Zeitlin S, Chen H, Crenshaw L, Gross S, Dantanarayana A, Delgado P, May JA, Dean T, Christianson DW. 1998. Structural analysis of inhibitor binding to human carbonic anhydrase II. Protein Sci 7:2483-2489.
9. Chaikin PM, Lubensky TC. 1995. Principles of condensed matter physics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. DeWitte RS, Ishchenko AV, Shakhnovich EI. 1997. SMoG: De novo design method based on simple, fast and accurate free energy estimates. 2. Case studies in molecular design. J Am Chem Soc 119:4608-4617.
11. DeWitte RS, Shakhnovich EI. 1994. Pseudodihedrals: Simplified protein backbone representation with knowledge-based energy. Protein Sci 3:1570-1581.
12. DeWitte RS, Shakhnovich EI. 1996. SMoG: De novo design method based on simple, fast and accurate free energy estimates. 1. Methodology and supporting evidence. J Am Chem Soc 118: 11733-11744.
13. Eldridge MD, Murray CW, Auton TR, Paolini GV, Mee RP. 1997. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J Comput-Aided Mol Des 11:425-445.
14. Finkelstein AV, Badretdinov AY, Gutin AM. 1995. Why do protein architecture have Boltzmann-like statistics? Proteins Struct Fund Genet 23:142-150.
15. Godzik A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. 1995. Are proteins ideal mixtures of amino acids? Analysis of energy parameter sets. Protein Sci 4:2107-2117.
16. Goldstein RA, Luthey-Schulten ZA, Wolynes PG. 1992a. Optimal protein-folding codes from spin-glass theory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:4918-4922.
17. Goldstein RA. Luthey-Schulten ZA, Wolynes PG. 1992b. Protein tertiary structure recognition using optimized Hamiltonians with local interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:9029-9033.
18. Hansen J-P, McDonald IR. 1996. Theory of simple liquids. London: Academic Press.
19. Head RD, Smythe ML, Oprea TI, Waller CL, Green SM, Marshall GR. 1996. VALIDATE: A new method for the receptor-based prediction of binding affinities of novel ligands. J Am Chem Soc 118:3959-3969.
20. Hinds DA, Levitt M. 1994. Exploring conformational space with a simple lattice model for protein structure. J Mol Biol 243:668-682.
21. Jernigan R, Bahar I. 1996. Structure-derived potentials for folding simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 6:195-209.
22. Kocher JA, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. 1994. Factors influencing the ability of knowledge-based potentials to identify native sequence-structure matches. J Mol Biol 235:1598-1613.
23. Kollman PA. 1993. Free energy calculations - Applications to chemical and biological phenomena. Chem Rev 7:2395-2417.
24. Martin YC. 1997. Challenges and prospects for computational aids to molecular diversity. Perspect Drug Discovery Des 7/8:159-172.
25. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenblmh MN, Teller AH, Teller E. 1953. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21:1087-1092.
26. Micheletti C, Maritan A, Banavar JR. 1999. A comparative study of existing and new design techniques for protein models. J Chem Phys 110:9730-9738.
27. Mirny LA, Shakhnovich EI. 1996. How to derive a protein folding potential? A new approach to an old problem. J Mol Biol 264:1164-1179.
28. Mitchell JBO, Laskowski RA, Alex A, Thornton JM. 1999. BLEEP - Potential of mean force describing protein-ligand interactions: I. Generating potential. J Comput Chem 20:1165-1176.
29. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. 1985. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: Quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 18:534-552.
30. Muegge I, Martin YC. 1999. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: A simplified potential approach. J Med Chem 42:791-804.
31. Rao BG, Tilton RF, Singh UC. 1992. Free energy perturbation studies on inhibitor binding to HIV-I proteinase. J Am Chem Soc 114:4447-4452.
32. Sedgewick R. 1990. Algorithms in C. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
33. Sippl MJ. 1990. Calculation of conformational ensemble from potential of mean force. An approach to knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 213:859-883.
34. Sippl MJ, Ortner M, Jaritz M. Lackner P. 1996. Helmholtz free energies of atom pair interactions in proteins. Fold Des 8:289-298.
35. Thomas PD, Dill KA. 1996. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: How accurate are they? J Mol Biol 257:457-469.
36. Verkhivker G, Appelt K, Freer ST, Villafranca JE. 1995. Empirical free energy calculations of ligand-protein crystallographic complexes. I. Knowledge-based ligand-protein interaction potentials applied to the prediction of human immunodeficiency virus 1 protease binding affinity. Protein Eng 8: 667-691.
37. Wallquist A, Jernigan R, Covell D. 1995. A preference-based free-energy parametrization of enzyme-inhibitor binding-application to HIV-1 protease inhibitor design. Protein Sci 4: 1881-1903.